FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Aroma Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate instance of a motorcycle accident, your initial steps are paramount; Carlson Bier is committed to providing legal guidance during these challenging moments. Based in Illinois, our esteemed team specializes in personal injury law with an exceptional edge in handling complex motorcycle incident cases. We offer extensive expertise and insightful representation essential to safeguarding your rights while meticulously pursuing fair compensation for sustained damages or distress. Despite being not physically present in Aroma Park, our firm diligently serves clients across this region through online consultations and court representations from where we are based. Wherever you may be within Illinois state boundaries including Aroma Park territory, rely on us as your robust defense line against adversities initiated by such accidents—negligence claims or insurance disputes alike—in the most professional manner possible. Seeking legal assistance is no longer equivocal when dealing with formidable entities; Choose Carlson Bier’s unmatched proficiency rooted deeply to handle every minute detail about Motorcycle Accident-related proceedings seamlessly and efficiently.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Aroma Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that a motorcycle accident can leave more than just physical injuries. The aftermath entails emotional trauma and financial burdens which may seem impossible to bear. We’re here not merely as Personal Injury Attorneys but as confidants, guiding you every step of the way towards getting the compensation you deserve.

The experience of involving in a motorcycle accident is invariably distressing, and without adequate legal representation, victims might be left struggling with mounting bills under the pressure from insurance companies. Our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier possess an unparalleled understanding of Illinois law surrounding such accidents and are dedicated to ensuring your rights are robustly protected.

Consider several elements when pursuing a personal injury claim after a motorcycle accident:

• Identifying Fault: This is crucial in most personal injury cases. Our proficient lawyers will investigate your case thoroughly to ascertain where fault lies and assist you in building up compelling evidence.

• Navigating Insurance Negotiations: It’s daunting to confront incapable or unwilling insurance companies single-handedly. That’s where we come into play – leveraging our vast experience defending clients like yourself during these complex negotiations.

• Medical Documentation: Proper medical records validate your claim illustrating detailed information on injuries sustained. At Carlson Bier, we guide you through this process ensuring no crucial document slips through unnoticed.

• Lost Wages & Earning Capacity: A significant aspect following an accident can be lost wages due to missed workdays and impaired future earning capacity if severe injuries inhibit return to work

Motorcycle riders lack traditional vehicle protections; thus their accidents yield severe consequences leading to extensive medical treatments or prolong recovery periods requiring long-term care plans. At times they face unfair bias considering them ‘risk-takers’. However, at Carlson Bier, we don’t believe in prejudiced perspectives.

Our attorneys empathize with your ordeal – comprehending what it means emotionally and financially for victims who must deal with unanticipated repercussions post-motorcycle accident incident while tirelessly fighting for compensation encompassing your medical bills, lost wages and mental ordeal. It’s not merely about legal representation for us – it’s dedicating our expertise to facilitate victims racing against time and financial stress.

Remember, every personal injury case bears unique circumstances. None are bound by a specific time frame; from settlement negotiations to trial phase duration varies significantly. Time is of the essence – while you focus on recovery let our legal experts ensure no opportunity slips out in securing fair compensation within statutory deadlines.

Being based in Illinois, we are strategically positioned to deal with cases within the state borders – familiar with local laws and administrative practices imperative aren’t overlooked during proceedings. Even though we don’t have a physical office in Aroma Park, this doesn’t restrict our capability or determined commitment towards easing your distress irrespective of where you reside within Illinois.

At Carlson Bier, we take pride as stalwart advocates known for tenacity and undeterred dedication in confronting big insurance corporations relentlessly until justice is served to their clients while continuing to provide personalized attention they deserve amid these trying times.

We invite you now: dispel any apprehensions that might be holding you back. Lay bare your concerns about potential costs associated with legal representation; remember at Carlson Bier – No Win translates into No Fee! You initiate action paying absolutely nothing unless WE WIN!

To discover what lies ahead on this daunting journey – click the button below now. Let’s calculate precisely how much your claim could be worth together in absolute transparency driven purely by extensive experience knowing what’s ideal under varying circumstance awaiting acknowledgment & due consideration…Hope isn’t far!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Aroma Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Aroma Park

Areas of Practice in Aroma Park

Cycling Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing specialist legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal representation for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal services to victims affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Fall Incidents

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Infant Harms

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents secure equitable compensation for wounds and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending professional legal advice for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Building Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Focused on assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440