FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Ava

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal representation for products liability issues in Ava, Illinois, Carlson Bier stands out as a premier choice. As a renowned personal injury law firm, we have honed the art of representing those injured due to product-related mishaps. We take pride in our extensive knowledge and experience in handling various types of product liability cases which range from defective household goods to unsafe pharmaceuticals or automotive parts. Our dedicated team works tirelessly to ensure victim’s rights are upheld and proper compensation is received. Moreover, Carlson Bier’s unwavering commitment towards its clients is reflected through their successes in courtrooms all over Illinois. This demonstrates our ability not merely to conform but excel amidst varying legal landscapes across different cities whilst upholding a high standard of professionalism and integrity throughout each case. Therefore regardless where you’re situated; with us at your side rest assured that when searching for robust representation concerning products liability claims within the state jurisdiction you’ll find no one better suited than Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Ava Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our paramount commitment is to advocate for our clients with relentless dedication and unfailing expertise. As a distinguished personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we address diverse areas of personal injury litigation beyond common car accidents or work-related injuries. Notably, Products Liability stands as one of our core areas of specialization.

In the realm of Products Liability, it’s integral to understand that manufacturers are legally bound to ensure the safety of their products. Consumers have a justifiable right to use these manufactured goods without fear of harm or damage due to defects. If you’ve experienced an unfortunate incident caused by faulty manufacturing standards or deceptive product presentation, you embody a consumer wronged – underscoring the relevance of Product Liability Law.

Products Liability covers three primary types

• Manufacturing Defects: These occur during the production process and result in an unexpected flaw in the item.

• Design Defects: These concerns arise when a product is inherently dangerous due to its design.

• Failure to Warn/Marketing Defects: This category refers to instances where potentially harmful goods do not contain adequate usage instructions or hazard warnings.

These categories may overlap at times but unequivocally showcase different facets within this complex legal territory.

Illinois observes ‘Strict Product Liability,’ implying that manufacturers bear extensive responsibility when their defective products instigate injuries – regardless if they were negligent in maintaining acceptable quality control measures. Therefore, any damaged party can take direct legal action without demonstrating manufacturer negligence as part of their claim prerequisites. It provides consumers with stronger recourse against harmful corporate practices while highlighting the importance of selecting a seasoned Personal Injury Attorney like Carlson Bier who excel in navigating such intricacies.

Understanding these key elements ensures that you don’t feel overwhelmed if suffering due to amiss goods:

– Minimal ways consumers absolve firms from liability: Your purchase lies under protection unless you significantly altered the said product post-purchase.

– Evidence relies on product state not your actions: It’s crucial to establish product faultiness at the time of purchase rather than proving your careful use.

– Injury due to Product Liability warrants compensation: Be it medical reimbursement, lost wages due to recovery, emotional damage or pain & suffering – every incurred loss is subject for review when settlement amounts are calculated.

Having proficient legal representation by Carlson Bier can mitigate undue emotional strain and secure favorable case outcomes. Furthermore, the duration within which you can file a lawsuit – known as the ‘statute of limitations’ – usually spans 2 years post-injury date in Illinois. Still, certain exceptions like discovery delays may extend this time-frame within reason. Hence, early attorney consultation improves chances of a sturdy trial foundation set via accurate evidence accumulation and expert legal strategizing.

At Carlson Bier, our lawyers draw from extensive litigation experience to assess all relevant factors thoroughly ensure viability of your claim while maximizing compensation potentiality. Our comprehensive knowledge base navigates both Federal regulations and Illinois-specific laws that govern defective products repercussions with unmatched precision.

As advocates for consumer justice driven by unwavering dedication and empathy, we champion your right to fair treating in courtrooms across Illinois landscape. With Carlson Bier’s team as your trusted counsel, you not only receive professional advice but also learn pivotal information about product liability law enabling financial reparation rightfully owed due inadequate company oversight.

Now that you’ve absorbed such robust insights into Products Liability realm through this enlightening experience with us at Carlson Bier; let’s take the next step together! Don’t let lingering doubts curtail deserved restitution any longer. Click on the button below to be paired with one of our experienced personal injury attorneys today. Therein lies a chance truly understanding how much your case might worth along-with thrust towards smoother journey overcoming this challenging moment bringing you ample peace-of-mind amidst prevailing uncertainty!

Challenge us with your unique situation today because each potential problem represents an opportunity for creative resolutions driving prosperous tomorrow.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ava Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Ava

Areas of Practice in Ava

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving professional legal advice for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents gain appropriate settlement for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Extending expert legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Neurological Harms

Focused on ensuring expert legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Harm

Committed to advocating for patients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440