Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Bannockburn

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the daunting consequences of a spinal cord injury, Carlson Bier stands as your reliable partner. As expert personal injury lawyers specializing in Spinal Cord Injuries, we bring not only exceptional legal competence but an understanding empathy for our clients’ unique challenges. Our sterling reputation has been built on guiding countless individuals through the complexities of their cases with unwavering commitment and resilience. With cutting-edge knowledge and strategies wielded by renowned attorneys, Carlson Bier ensures nothing is overlooked—whether it’s medical costs to managing lifestyle adaptations necessary after such injuries—we leave no stone unturned to get you what you rightfully deserve. We act tirelessly in representing those who have sustained spinal cord injuries due to others’ negligent actions across various settings within Illinois including Bannockburn area while adhering strictly to state regulations relating location of practice. Choose Carlson Bier for dedicated compassion combined with formidable representation for your Spinal Cord Injuries case. Trust us because we care; stay along because results speak louder than words!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Bannockburn Illinois

At the esteemed law practice of Carlson Bier, our team of skilled personal injury attorneys dedicate their advanced knowledge and legal prowess to serve individuals in Illinois who have suffered spinal cord injuries. As a bastion of advocacy, we understand the difficulties you face – they span beyond physical pain and permeate every aspect of life: your livelihood, relationships, both mental and emotional health can be radically affected. In turn, we commit ourselves to shoulder your fight for justice against parties liable for your debilitating predicament.

It is indispensable that you fully understand the intricacies involved with spinal cord injuries as increased awareness can enhance your legal strategy. Spinal cord injuries are typically an offshoot of significant trauma such as car accidents or serious slips and falls. These may result in various types of damage including Complete Spinal Cord Injury where there’s total loss of sensory function below the point of injury; or Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury where some functionalities remain operative.

Due to these diverse complications associated with each type:

– Immediate emergency response and ongoing medical treatment become imperative.

– Costs related to treatments can surge exponentially causing severe financial distress.

– Losses include potential future earnings due to chronic disability or reduced work capacity which generates a domino effect on victim’s economic stability.

Aforementioned challenges emphasize the criticality of securing proficient legal counsel equipped specifically with handling spinal cord injuries cases under personal injury law. At Carlson Bier, we ensure vigorous examination of every case detail encompassing medical evaluations from subject matter experts, evaluation of evidence like accident reports, witness testimonies amongst others – all meticulously pieced together in constructing an irrefutable claim aimed at maximizing compensation

Knowledge plays a pivotal role here – understanding what comprises a solid lawsuit following such grave injury:

– You must demonstrate presence of duty by defendant (i.e., responsibility towards plaintiff’s safety)

– It should be evident that this duty was breached leading directly/indirectly to plaintiff’s harm.

– Clear documentation of damages sustained should be available.

At Carlson Bier, we champion your rights and work to secure a beneficial outcome for you. By leaving the legal complexities in our diligent care, you can focus primarily on recovery and rehabilitation.

While nothing can truly compensate the life-changing aftermath of spinal cord injuries, gaining deserved compensation goes a long way in managing widespread implications at each turn. It might cover various requirements including medical expenses – past, present and future; lost wages due to inability to continue working or lower earning capacity; costs involved with physical therapy or rehabilitation; pain and suffering (both physical and emotional); loss of consortium if injury has marred relationship with spouse or partner etc.

Though determination of value attached to your specific case involves intricate considerations around diverse factors – its complexity is navigated accurately by capable lawyers well versed with nuances of Illinois law. They adopt an insightful approach identifying pertinent areas demonstrating negligent behavior leading invariably to injury thereby paving a path towards entitlement of rightful monetary recompense.

Trust us with resolving your most pressing predicament related to spinal cord injuries while upholding justice for all wrong done unto you. Allow us at Carlson Bier to offer proficient advice rooted deep within realms of personal injury law rendering desired results that measure up realistically against given circumstances surrounding plaintiff’s situation which in essence forms crux of judicious verdict delivery.

The skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier are ready and waiting, armed with experience, resources, passion for justice tempered by understanding compassion about your condition – just a click away! We invite you to delve deeper into familiarizing yourselves more comprehensively about specifics directly relating stability post-spinal cord injury through access below. Do not let this unfortunate event deter progress when every problem brings potential solution hidden within – Let’s uncover yours together! Explore now how much possibly stands worthy attributable as compensation linked solely onto contours defining your unique case ahead – Click on the button below because knowledge is power after all!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bannockburn Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Bannockburn

Areas of Practice in Bannockburn

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving specialist legal assistance for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Extending experienced legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal services to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Trip Incidents

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents receive just recompense for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Extending professional legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for harms.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Brain Injuries

Specializing in extending dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Focused on supporting persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer