FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Bement

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a construction site accident in Bement, Carlson Bier is your best recourse. Our law firm specializes in personal injury cases and has a proven track record of competence and dedication to protecting our clients’ rights. Construction sites are often riddled with potential hazards; that’s why there are stringent laws set up to protect the safety and wellbeing of workers. If these standards aren’t upheld due to negligence or oversight, serious injuries can occur leading to devastating consequences for the injured party. With decades of experience, our adept attorneys have mastered how Illinois Laws apply specifically to such occurrences ensuring maximum compensation for all damages deserved by our clients including medical expenses, lost wages, pain & suffering among other losses suffered as result of another’s negligence at a construction site accident. Trusting Carlson Bier means choosing quality legal advice marked by strategic planning paired with aggressive representation always dedicated towards fighting for justice on behalf every client we advocate for during such challenging times involving complex litigations unique to this niche area within Personal Injury Law practice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Bement Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of industrious personal injury attorneys assisting clients across the diverse state of Illinois. Drawing on our extensive years of experience in providing legal assistance and representation, we prioritize those who have unfortunately encountered accidents at construction sites. We understand that such incidents can have profound impacts on both your health and livelihood and proceed with utmost compassion and diligence to help you secure the compensation you deserve.

Construction site accidents encompass an array of incidences from falling objects, equipment failings, electrical mishaps, scaffold collapses to slip & fall injuries among others. Being involved in such cases can lead not just to physical damage but also emotional trauma and financial stress due to mounting medical bills or loss of wages while recuperating. At our law firm, we meticulously investigate every aspect of your case down to minute details ensuring no stone is unquestionably left unturned when it comes to securing fair compensation for your suffering.

Through our services at Carlson Bier, here’s what clients can expect:

• Comprehensive Case Analysis: Our attorneys delve deep into understanding the nuances associated with each client’s case.

• Documentation Assistance: Handling paperwork related to filing claim procedures can be complicated; thus we simplify this process by taking care of all required documents.

• Legal Advise & Representation: Be it presenting facts convincingly during a negotiation or aggressively arguing for justice in courtrooms; our lawyers champion every stage of the legal proceedings.

• Regular Update Provision: Client communication is integral to us; hence we always keep them abreast with developments about their case.

Navigating through complex laws hearing construction site accidents might seem overwhelming especially when coping up with physical injuries simultaneously. However, let our specialists handle the intricacies so that you concentrate solely on healing. By choosing us as your trusted personal injury lawyer group in Illinois who specialize in Construction Site Accident cases will ensure that you exercise your rights confidently without being undermined by clever tactics employed insurance companies who try diminishing worthiness of claims.

We realize that people often have numerous queries during such trying times. For this reason, we provide a detailed Frequently Asked Section (FAQs), where one can gather vital information like eligibility for filing construction accident claims, documents needed, the extent of compensation entitled to, time bar within which legal action must be initiated and much more.

Remember – No case is too big or minor because every victim who has encountered traumatic injuries due to construction site accidents deserves justice. We believe in making difference through securing fair settlements as you navigate your road to recovery being well aware of your rights backed By Carlson Bier’s knowledgeable guidance. Note: understand our boundaries about certain restrictions on advertising practiced by law; rest assured we provide service across Illinois but do not imply to particularly affiliate with a specific city unless showcased by our physical office presence in the respective location.

In conclusion, personal injury cases require both extensive knowledge and experience for successful outcomes. You need attorneys bred out of sheer determination like ours at Carlson Bier whose insistence upon honesty and robust representation has assisted countless individuals to secure rightful compensation thus aiding them inch towards normalcy after grappling with unprecedented hurdles typified by construction site accidents. We invite you wholeheartedly; click the button below to schedule a free initial consultation today! Allow us to evaluate the potency of your case meticulously before determining just how much it’s worth financially endeavouring relentlessly until justice is served favourably on your behalf.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bement Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Bement

Areas of Practice in Bement

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending expert legal assistance for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Extending professional legal advice for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing adept legal assistance to customers affected by defective items.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Tumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents get appropriate payout for hurts and losses.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Collision

Ensuring expert legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for hurts.

Worksite Mishaps

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Head Harms

Focused on providing expert legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Death

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal support to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Damage

Committed to representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440