FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Bensenville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If your safety has been compromised due to a faulty product in Bensenville, you should consider the expert services of Carlson Bier. We stand as a top-tier law firm specializing in Products Liability cases. Our prowess extends far beyond general practice, offering astute legal strategies backed by our comprehensive understanding of Illinois’ stringent liability laws. Over the years, we have developed irrefutable expertise in ensuring manufacturers are held accountable for products’ adverse effects on consumers like yourself. At Carlson Bier, we don’t take any case lightly; our proficient attorneys meticulously probe every aspect of each claim for maximum compensation possible under Illinois Law. Proven personal injury lawyers will work diligently to safeguard your rights and interests so that peace can be restored back into your life after heavy duress caused by defective products’ impact.Never let unsafe merchandise ruin what’s important—trust only firms like ours that feature experienced lawyers who understand intricate complexities involving a diverse range of goods and their standards – trust Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Bensenville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a reputable personal injury law firm positioned in the heartland of Illinois, specializing in Products Liability. We understand that accidents have far-reaching impacts. Our objective is to guide you through this trying time by providing not just legal representation, but also ample relevant information tailored to aide your understanding of liability claims.

Products Liability refers to a manufacturer or seller being held liable for placing a defective product into the hands of a consumer. It’s important to note that responsibility may lie with any party within the distribution chain. In essence, if a product causes an injury due to being flawed or falsely marketed, you could be entitled to compensation.

Various factors play significant roles in these cases:

• Duty Of Care: Manufacturers owe consumers a responsibility to ensure their products are safe for usage.

• Breach Of Duty: This occurs when manufacturers falter on their duty—resulting in sale and distribution of dangerous goods.

• Causation: To claim damages, it must be proved that your injuries were directly caused by using the defective product.

Although establishment of fault might appear straightforward, numerous technicalities can complicate such cases. For instance:

– Strict liability allows victims to get compensated without proving negligence. Essentially producers remain accountable as long as their malfunctioned product resulted in harm regardless of standard safety measures taken during manufacturing.

– Negligence homages on negligent actions by manufacturer causing defects despite known better procedures.

– Breach of warranty involves violation either express (explicitly stated warranty) or implied (unspoken/unwritten guarantee) warranting lawful indemnity occurrences.

Remember, each Products Liability case necessitates its unique approach primarily based upon applicable law and specifics surrounding your injuries. Consequently, it becomes requisite seeking consultation from experienced professionals like our team at Carlson Bier who are equipped with expansive knowledge coupled with robust practical experience.

Coming forth binding value is engaging collectively thus creating an effective claim strategy that encompasses:

* Comprehensive investigation with meticulous attention to garner all potential evidences and witnesses.

* Scientific testing of the product to critically establish defectiveness or high risk factors.

* Collaboration with medical professionals to validate your bodily injuries, predict future potentials and determine expenses linked thereon.

At Carlson Bier, we pride in our commitment towards clients. You will receive personalized attention as we work assiduously advocating for you every step of the way. It’s crucial to us that you comprehend your legal rights and available options because informed decisions are best made decisions.

The after effects of an accident can be overwhelming. But it becomes less daunting when you take assertive steps towards justice by seeking professional help to navigate the complexities involved in mounting a solid case against responsible entities.

As such, do NOT allow lawsuit technicalities intimidate you from pursuing rightful compensation owed on account of defective products impacting your health! Take leverage quantifying unknowns through our no-commitment evaluation – simply click on the button below for instant access!

Allow us represent not just mere words but prove deliverance reinforcing confidence in our adept expertise at handling Products Liability cases efficiently. Trust Carlson Bier- a celebrated champion standing steadfast by Illinois residents! Your victory strides count significantly clicking onto us today thereby helping ascertain what’s worth claiming in wake of inadvertent predicaments caused due faulty merchandise transactions.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bensenville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Bensenville

Areas of Practice in Bensenville

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing skilled legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering dedicated legal advice for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending expert legal help to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Slip Accidents

Adept in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to guiding clients of car accidents gain equitable remuneration for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring adept legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to offering professional legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Focused on advocating for victims with paralysis, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440