FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Burlington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to Construction Site Accidents in Burlington, look no further than Carlson Bier. As a leading personal injury lawyer firm in Illinois, our expertise lies in handling construction accident cases implementing precision and diligence. We comprehend the financial and emotional turmoil that accidents can cause for victims and their families alike; hence we strive dedicatedly to warrant their justice is served promptly. Our adept team boasts of competent attorneys who are well-versed with local, state laws making us the premier consideration for your legal representation needs after a disastrous construction site mishap. At Carlson Bier, we represent clients fervently, whether those injuries come from falls, equipment malfunctions or any other incident related with construction work sites. Our priority is protecting injured workers’ rights while alleviating their concerns about mounting medical debts or lost wages due to inability to continue gainful employment post such traumas associated with workplace safety breaches on Burlington’s various constructions projects . Choose Carlson Bier: ensuring competence through every step of your legal journey.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Burlington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re committed to ensuring justice for victims of personal injury incidents. One area where our expertise is most beneficial is in accidents that transpire within construction sites. These types of incidents are unfortunately common and can lead to severe physical damage as well as psychological trauma for the affected individuals.

Construction site accidents encompass a wide array of mishaps from falling debris, equipment malfunction, inadequate safety precautions, slips and falls, repetitive motion injuries to vehicle-related collisions. Our experienced team of attorneys specializes in investigating such circumstances thoroughly and advocating relentlessly on behalf of our clients.

Here are key points to consider when identifying whether you have a valid personal injury case following an accident at a construction site:

• Severity and cause of the injury: The extent of your physical harm must be apparent, and caused by another’s negligence or intentional misconduct.

• Presence of violations: Any breach of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards will significantly bolster your case.

Furthermore, it’s important to understand Illinois workers’ compensation law when assessing claims involving construction site accidents. All companies operating in Illinois must provide their employees with worker’s compensation coverage which provides benefits regardless who was at fault for the accident. However, this does not necessarily preclude additional legal action if there were gross negligences or other parties involved.

Understanding these laws can be daunting; that’s why we’re here – dedicated to guiding you through every step—providing comprehensive advice tailored specifically to your unique situation. We’ll help determine liability, collect evidence supporting your claim whilst defending against counterclaims effectively.

Our results-driven approach ensures we take all necessary actions towards securing adequate compensation for your medical bills, lost wages while unable to work due to injury along with pain and suffering endured. This includes future treatments related directly or indirectly incurred as a result of the accident like rehabilitation costs adding up over time—an aspect often overlooked initially but critical nonetheless.

We strive not only for financial respite but are committed to advocating for safer working environments and protecting workers’ rights. We collaborate with industry experts and regulatory authorities sensitizing stakeholders towards adhering to the best safety practices.

At Carlson Bier, we are fully able to serve clients throughout the State of Illinois. With extensive expertise in personal injury claims related specifically to construction accidents, our team is well-versed in all relevant areas pertinent to your case. From initial consultations through resolution—whether trial or settlement—we’re with you every step of the way.

If you, or a loved one has suffered due to a construction site accident, don’t wait – seek legal assistance immediately. Time is of the essence since certain aspects may be time-sensitive such as filing suit against negligent parties or preserving evidence before it’s lost.

Our long-standing experience coupled with an unwavering commitment towards advancing justice makes us an ideal partner in navigating these challenging circumstances. Get it touch today — let’s jointly operate towards ensuring your peace of mind through optimal compensation which is commensurate with your experiences as well as your losses.

We understand that no amount can truly compensate for what you’ve gone through; however, securing a fair monetary verdict could ease financial burdens stemming from the incident thereby providing some solace moving forward.

Rest assured knowing you’re not alone during this difficult time – click on the button below now so we can evaluate how much your case could potentially be worth while providing some guidance next steps wise at absolutely no cost.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Burlington Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Burlington

Areas of Practice in Burlington

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending specialist legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Negligence

Delivering experienced legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal services to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Slip Occurrences

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Neonatal Damages

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Committed to aiding individuals of car accidents receive reasonable payout for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Offering adept legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Expert in ensuring expert legal advice for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440