FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Carbondale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a construction site accident in Carbondale, its victims need reliable and experienced legal representation to secure their rights. Carlson Bier’s Construction Site Accident attorneys are revered for their unwavering commitment to ensure justice is served. Our distinguished team possesses exceptional knowledge of Illinois laws pertaining to these incidents; this understanding allows us to advocate effectively on behalf of clients seeking compensation for medical bills, lost wages or other accident-related financial setbacks. With decades worth collective experience handling intricate construction site cases, our firm has built an impressive track record in achieving successful outcomes – a testament to our dedication and expertise. Leveraging thorough evidence-driven strategies and proactive pursuit tactics, we ensure every element associated with your case gets meticulous attention it deserves. The goal? Attaining fair reparations due on your account while you focus onto recovery without stress impinging over fiscal uncertainties post-mishap! Trust Carlson Bier – Contact us today for unequivocal assistance navigating complexities tied around Construction Site Accidents litigation in Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Carbondale Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities of workplace injuries specifically when they happen at construction sites. Our team has navigated countless clients through the legal aftermath of accidents that take place on construction projects across Illinois. Drawing from vast experience garnered over years of practice in personal injury law, our dedicated attorneys are poised to offer strategic counsel and representation tailored to your unique situation.

Construction site accidents carry incredible consequences ranging from minor bruises to severe injuries or even death. Common accidents include falls from heights, equipment failures, electrocution, and collisions with falling objects. All these incidences usually leave victims in physical pain and psychological distress compounded by overwhelming medical bills. In worst-case scenarios, families are left bereft as they grapple with the loss of a loved one.

One key point worth noting is that workers’ compensation may not be enough to cover all losses incurred after being injured on a job site. Other responsible parties such as general contractors, property owners, or equipment manufacturers may bear liability for dangerous conditions that led to an accident.

– Subcontractors failing to adhere to safety codes could bear responsibility.

– An equipment manufacturer might be held accountable for hazardous products.

– Site owners can also be liable if they were aware of but failed to correct unsafe conditions.

Our experts at Carlson Bier navigate the complexity of establishing fault and demand accountability while seeking fair compensation for sustained damages.

In line with the gravity and complexity associated with construction site injuries, we highly recommend immediate reporting followed by meticulous documentation which should preferably include any evidence like photographs or witness statements where possible.

Understandably so – The aftermath of an accident can feel daunting but you’re not alone: Navigating medical treatments while worrying about loss wages can be overwhelming; this is why at Carlson Bier, our attorney-client relationship goes beyond mere professional ties -we see you as individuals who have experienced life-shattering situations due simply trying earn livelihoods – And commitment helping through said circumstance underlined compassion dedication justice .

Hence, we deeply empathize with the distress stemming from these tragedies. Our lawyers are not only experienced; they’re also compassionate individuals who tirelessly fight to restore hope and ensure fair outcomes for our clients.

It should also be mentioned that in Illinois, personal injury cases have a two-year statute of limitations starting from either when the injury occurred or was discovered. The timeline can vary depending on specific details in one’s case so speaking with an attorney promptly after an accident is crucial.

At Carlson Bier, we understand each case is unique and demands a tailored approach. We assess every fine detail holistically to deliver individualized legal solutions that will bring you respite.

Your pain is valid – don’t try to carry it alone. Reach out today for professional assistance built upon years of experience handling construction site accidents across Illinois. Remember: The pursuit of full compensation may require delving beyond the basic worker’s compensation insurance.

Take advantage now of our extensive expertise honed by significant victories against negligent parties in construction site injuries litigation within Illinois’ borders.

Our commitment at Carlson Bier goes deep – helping hurting victims obtain justice while rebuilding their lives remains our utmost priority ever!

Begin your journey towards comprehensive redress today by clicking the button below – Find out how much your case might be worth and take confident strides into a more secure future where justice prevails!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carbondale Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Carbondale

Areas of Practice in Carbondale

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Burn Burns

Giving professional legal assistance for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Hospital Negligence

Providing specialist legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending expert legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Mishaps

Incidents: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents receive just recompense for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Extending expert legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for damages.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to delivering specialized legal support for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and adept legal services to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Committed to assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440