FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Charleston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is a seasoned Products Liability attorney group based in Illinois that sets the gold standard for legal representation. This exceptional law firm offers unparalleled services to clients across locations, including Charleston. Specializing in products liability claims, their mission is unsurpassed dedication and tireless advocacy on your behalf. Carlson Bier has an enviable track record of success and is adept at navigating complex cases involving defective or dangerous products that cause harm or injury to consumers. They meticulously scrutinize every facet of each case they undertake, ensuring thorough investigation and robust client representation against manufacturers, distributors, suppliers or retailers responsible for product risks or defects involved in personal injuries sustained by their clientele. As experienced litigators with intricate knowledge of both national federal laws and nuanced state-specific legislation pertaining to Product Liability issues – such as Illinois’ strict product liability laws – the team at Carlson Bier equips you with trusted counsel enabling a strategic approach towards seeking redress; solidifying them as the best consideration for your Products Liability related concerns.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Charleston Illinois

When it comes to the complexities of product liability law, Carlson Bier stands as a leading authority in Illinois. We are trusted personal injury attorneys dedicated to safeguarding consumer rights and holding businesses or manufacturers accountable for any harm caused by their products.

Product Liability pertains to instances where consumers face injuries due to defective or dangerous products. It is an area of law where manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers can be held responsible if their product causes harm to the consumer’s health or property.

Understanding Product Liability demands knowledge of three crucial types. Firstly, manufacturing defects; here the damage occurs during the product’s assembly process making it unsafe for usage. Under this circumstance, even a properly designed item could lead to catastrophic consequences due to botched manufacturing processes.

Secondly, design defects are where a flaw makes an entire line of products harmful regardless of precise construction techniques adhered during assembly stage- these items are inherently perilous. Lastly, marketing defects occur when there is inadequate warning about potential hazards linked with using those products or erroneous instructions concerning its correct use.

In order to establish Product Liability under Illinois law:

• The product in question must have reached the user without any considerable alteration from when it was sold.

• The user must encounter injury because she/he used the product reasonably and as intended.

• There ought to be visible damage—physical injury or property damage—to claim Product Liability.

• Lastly and most crucially -the commodity in question should indeed possess a substantial defect that directly leads to causing harm.

Such cases require stringent qualifications often exhibit complexity unique from other personal injuries legal claims requiring expert testimony and detailed analysis—a daunting challenge for anyone woefully unprepared or not professionally versed in handling such intricate issues.

Here at Carlson Bier, we understand these nuances within Products Liability laws providing reliable advocacy and experienced counsel needed during each step ensuring your rightful compensation accomplished smoothly through constant support based on hearty communication , thorough preparation & eminent professionalism .

Our intense commitment towards representing clients against formidable corporations leverages our ability in attaining satisfactory verdicts and settlements. We pour over every minute detail of your case breaking down complex issues in a manner easily comprehensible to you ensuring no information is missed that strengthens your claim’s authenticity.

While manufacturer liability laws are in place to protect consumers, they do not always guarantee affected individuals will successfully win their case. Having an expert personal injury attorney from Carlson Bier lends significant advantage by obtaining the much-needed justice you rightfully deserve through astute legal counsel equipped with deep understanding of Illinois’ product liability laws.

We diligently work to gather all the necessary scientific or technical evidence, teaming up with professional experts when required for building solid arguments reaching satisfactorily robust settlements or successful results in court. Guidance from skilled attorneys also plays a pivotal role because speed is crucial; legal deadlines may affect your compensation recovery rights if overlooked .

If you’ve suffered an unfortunate incident regarding Product Liability getting immediate medical attention should be first followed by swiftly contacting experienced personal injury attorneys who can help assess your situation thoroughly aiding with right steps ahead . Don’t proceed alone on this complicated journey , let Carlson Bier shoulder this responsibility safeguarding your rights effectively while keeping at bay any further distress or inconvenience .

Understanding the worth of your Products Liability case isn’t easy without expert consultation entailing requisite knowledge concerning relevant laws, available damages, defendant’s financial capability , circumstantial influencing details – get assuring clarity now & press the button below enabling us understand more about specifics involved so we could provide accurate evaluation of what potentially might be recovered for you addressing impact caused due to pain and suffering endured.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Charleston Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Charleston

Areas of Practice in Charleston

Cycling Crashes

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing specialist legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering experienced legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Slip Mishaps

Adept in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Committed to supporting clients of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for damages and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring expert legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for damages.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Brain Injuries

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440