FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Chemung

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the vigilant pursuit of justice for those hampered by products liability, Carlson Bier steadfastly upholds its esteemed reputation as the leading personal injury firm in Illinois. Boasting an impressive track record secured through unwavering dedication and adept prowess, choosing Carlson Bier equates to choosing success when faced with complex legalities surrounding harmful or defective products. Our focus on exhaustive research, unyielding negotiation tactics, and relentless representation is instrumental in our strategy that has been time-tested to achieve maximum compensation for our clients’ losses. We prioritize clear communication and transparency at every step of your case – a value espoused irrespective of geographic constraints within Illinois. Proximity does not limit effectiveness; therefore Carlton Bier’s reach extends beyond boundaries instilling trust in its counsel sought by Chemung residents involved in Products Liability disputes locally or statewide. With singular dedication towards client welfare from the very onset till resolution, secure your rights with distinctive competency only offered by Carlson Bier – trusted statewide but appreciated personally.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Chemung Illinois

Every day, countless individuals across Illinois fall victim to injuries caused by defective products. At Carlson Bier, our objective is steadfast: to fight passionately on behalf of each client who has been inadvertently harmed because of the negligence of manufacturers and retailers. As a leading Personal Injury Law Firm in Illinois, we specialize in cases related to Product Liability, helping victims gain deserved compensation.

Product liability comes under the personal injury law umbrella that holds companies accountable for any damage or injury resulting from their product. There are three fundamental types of defects that burden consumers. The first is design defects which exist even before manufacturing begins. The second type includes manufacturing defects not initially apparent in design but occurring during production. Lastly there are marketing defects which primarily involve improper instructions or failure to provide sufficient safety warnings for consumers.

It’s crucial to understand that corporations possess an inherent duty to ensure they manufacture and market safe products for consumers—an obligation transcending quality and performance promises they make within their advertisements and packaging materials. So when said organizations fail in executing this significant duty due to negligence or intentional misconduct, victims deserve every right for ample restitution as per Illinois Product Liability Laws.

Notably, Product Liability Laws significantly vary across different states; thus hiring experienced lawyers like us can prove vital regarding comprehensively understanding your legal rights and options within similar lawsuits.

At Carlson Bier, we possess deep-seated understanding about dealing with complex matters surrounding product liability claims—after all, standing up against large-scale corporations capable of employing vast resources toward evading accusations can be daunting without expert assistance.

Since proving fault forms a critical component within product liability lawsuits, decisive evidence related to defective design or malfunction plays an integral part—and our team excels at such fact-finding adventures!

Besides recognizing viable sources required for gathering essential information relevant to your case—ranging from seasoned experts validating faulty designs causing harm—to eyewitnesses regarding physical manifestations substantiating injuries—we’re adept at utilizing these resources ensuring you receive valid legal representation.

Moreover, we strive diligently to secure maximum compensation on behalf of clients. Any accident leading to physical harm not only takes an emotional toll but also burdens victims with expensive medical bills and potential loss of income. We handle all relevant paperwork seamlessly for you, negotiating fiercely—with insurance companies and at-fault parties alike—aiming for deserved compensation to cover overwhelming expenses correlated with your injuries.

We believe nobody should endure pain or suffering due to a product deemed safe for usage—and here’s where our responsibility as trusted personal injury lawyers gains momentum: offering vital support during tribulations; encouraging and assisting our fellow Illinoisans in regaining their life control while holding guilty parties accountable.

In conclusion, Product Liability matters are far from straightforward, often involving considerable investigation, preparing detailed evidence-supported arguments alongside rigorous negotiations. Hence entrusting us, the experienced professionals at Carlson Bier Law Firm seems highly advantageous to ensuring fair outcomes respecting your rights under Illinois laws.

Now is the time to reach out; remember—your future well-being may greatly depend upon immediate steps taken post unfortunate incidents posing severe health risks due to defective products. Click the button below right now—for a detailed evaluation of your case—in determining rewarding compensatory measures you genuinely deserve amidst feeling victimized by manufacturers violating regulations related to Products Liability within Illinois State law boundaries. Your peace of mind matters most—which remains steadfastly centered within our belief system even whilst navigating these complex litigations we excel working with—you’re never alone when choosing Carlson Bier fighting passionately on your behalf!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chemung Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Chemung

Areas of Practice in Chemung

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending skilled legal assistance for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Trip Accidents

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Offering legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to guiding sufferers of car accidents receive equitable payout for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Trucking Crash

Extending specialist legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Neurological Injuries

Committed to delivering specialized legal services for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to representing individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440