FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Chenoa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you are dealing with the aftermath of a motorcycle accident in Chenoa, it is crucial to have expert legal help on your side. The stakes can’t get any higher, repercussions of an unsuccessful claim could include costly medical bills that amplify your stress and financial damage exponentially. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play. Our proficiency is distinctively focused on personal injury law with an unrivaled pedigree in supporting clients involved in motorcycle accidents. We meticulously analyse every facet of your case, from investigating the circumstances that led up to the accident to comprehending its consequences on you and others affected by it; we leave no stone unturned. Choosing Carlson Bier ensures robust advocacy founded upon years of successful claims management experiences within Illinois’ complex legislative landscape—to maximize your compensation successfully while treating each client’s case as distinctive as they are themselves will be our attorneys main focus until full resolution has occurred.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Chenoa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our primary focus and field of expertise lies in personal injury law – a specialty honed to aid the victims of egregious incidents whose lives have been disrupted by the negligence or intentional misconduct of others. Emphasizing one significant area, we are adept at navigating the complexities surrounding motorcycle accidents in Illinois that very often leave victims suffering from serious injuries faced with mounting medical bills, loss of wages and other unanticipated hardships.

Motorcycle accidents can bring about disastrous consequences due to factors such as limited visibility, lack of physical barriers, and high-speed collisions. The potential for devastating bodily harm is significantly more than in car accidents – as motorcycles don’t possess an encapsulating metal frame, airbags or other safety features inherently present in automobiles. This makes accidents involving motorcycles penchant for leaving victims with severe injuries requiring intensive care and long-term treatment.

There’s a wide array of reasons behind these motorcycle accidents:

– Negligence by other motorists – drivers failing to notice motorcyclists on roads leading to catastrophic collisions.

– Reckless driving – speeding, drunken driving, disobeying traffic rules escalate the risks considerably.

– Road conditions – potholes, slick pavements among others contribute significantly towards motorcycle accidents.

When you’ve fallen victim to any such circumstances through no fault of your own but due to someone else’s negligence or wrongdoing calls directly for legal action and compensation rightfully owed to you—the endeavor where Carlson Bier steps into advocate fervently on behalf of injured motorcyclists. Our commitment is unwaveringly directed towards securing justice and financial restitution capable of covering amassed medical expenses, compensating for wage losses during recovery periods in addition practices addressing pain & suffering inflicted upon those involved.

Navigating through the intricacies posed by insurance companies can itself be another grueling challenge. These corporations typically aim at minimizing their payouts—with tactics focused around denying claims entirely or construing accident details favorably benefiting their interests rather than their obligation towards rightful compensation.

This is precisely where professional legal aid becomes crucial. At Carlson Bier, our primary objective embarks upon ensuring that victims are not shortchanged and receive a fair settlement aligning accurately to the degree of injuries suffered and turmoil endured. Our attorneys seamlessly handle negotiations with insurance companies—battling forcefully against attempts geared at undervaluing or denying claims.

At times when these efforts fail to suffice—when insurance companies refuse an equitable settlement—our seasoned and astute lawyers aren’t hesitant in taking the matter up to court, fighting relentlessly until justice is served to our clients’ utmost satisfaction.

Choosing effective representation matters profoundly—and here’s what makes us distinct:

– Personalized Approach: Each case is unique—we value this uniqueness crafting customized legal strategies aptly fitting circumstances involved.

– Extensive Experience: Trial-tested experience dealing throughout varying facets of personal injury law.

– No-Fee Policy: Until we secure your deserved victory, we don’t bill you any fees – You pay us only if we win for you!

If you’ve been a victim of a motorcycle accident in Illinois, it’s essential for you to act quickly – time limit nuances encrusted within Illinois state law necessitate moving swiftly towards securing just compensation deserved by initiating legal proceedings without delay.

We invite you today, stand strong along Carlson Bier—a synergy that would embark fervently against those causing damages unfairly disrupting lives. Don’t merely look on helplessly as medical bills keep piling—take control over your situation unfolding paths leading towards justice rightfully owed. Simply click on the button below assessing what exactly your case stands worth—the first step marking initiation of our collective expedition carving out resilient trajectories centered around acquiring deserved claim comprehensively satisfying all aspects involved—it’s time to reclaim the peace unjustly stolen from life’s stability!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chenoa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Chenoa

Areas of Practice in Chenoa

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving specialist legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering specialist legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying specialist legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Fall Incidents

Professional in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain just settlement for damages and impairment.

Scooter Mishaps

Focused on providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Trucking Incident

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Focused on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in providing professional legal representation for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Adept at managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Death

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440