FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Chicago Loop

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with a Products Liability case, securing the right representation is crucial. In Chicago Loop and throughout Illinois, Carlson Bier’s attorneys have established themselves as reputable products liability advocates. With our profound understanding of relevant regulations and innumerable successful claims under our belt, we’re effectively positioned to not only navigate the complex path but also ensure justice prevails for you. Responsible manufacturing practices can make a substantial difference between safety and danger. If your health has been jeopardized due to defective items or insidious business actions, it’s time to hold those at fault accountable. At Carlson Bier, we bring exemplary legal prowess while being simultaneously empathetic towards our clients’ plights–seeing beyond numbers on court documents to actual individuals affected by unfavorable scenarios caused by negligent businesses.Clarity in communication along side relentless pursuit for truth is part of what sets us apart from many others.We don’t just provide legal services; we create lasting partnerships based on shared goals—achieving justice together!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Chicago Loop Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we represent Illinois residents in numerous personal injury cases – one notable area of expertise being Products Liability. The journey with a products liability case often begins when an individual sustains damages or injuries due to defective design, manufacturing defects, or inconsistent and misleading marketing practices associated with various types of consumer goods.

Understanding what constitutes product liability is imperative for potential claimants. Products liability typically involves three significant areas: defectively manufactured products or those that become faulty during their production process; products inherently designed defectively making them unsafe even if impeccably produced; and lack of sufficient instructions or warnings in reference to proper usage of the product leading to inadvertent mishaps.

At Carlson Bier Attorney Group, we meticulously examine each client’s situation on a case-by-case basis — assessing not just the immediate medical expenses but analyzing possible future healthcare costs, lost wages because of missed workdays, as well as pain and suffering endured due to the faulted merchandise.

It’s worth noting that laws governing product liability can often be formidable given their complex nature. However, rest assured as you engage with us – our experienced legal cadre has profound know-how within this space and will leave no stone unturned in safeguarding your rights while aiding you in recovering maximum compensation.

• Our team ensures thorough investigations into your particular incident using top-notch resources.

• We aggressively negotiate settlements – never settling for less than what our client deserves.

• In instances where agreement cannot be reached out-of-court, we’re fully prepared to take your case onto trials; arming it with robust evidence that proves neglect on part of the defendant.

With over successful years under our belt serving clients across Illinois regions (not Chicago Loop), we’ve built strong rapport within local courts systems — something greatly useful when advocating for you.

Products tainted by poor quality materials badly affect individuals’ lives daily – sometimes causing irreversible damage both physically and mentally– hence every person has the right to legal recourse. This is precisely why at Carlson Bier, we strive to keep our clients informed about the progress of their case at every turn; maintaining clear and consistent communication channels no matter how complex your case may be.

Allow us to fight alongside you in seeking compensatory justice for product-related injuries. Having been confronted by a sudden incident due to a faulty commodity, it’s likely you might feel overwhelmed amidst burgeoning medical bills, ecosystems of insurance jargon, and ongoing physical suffering. The team at Carlson Bier wishes to alleviate part of that pressure – providing you with the requisite counsel and compassion during your journey towards recovery.

To further support our commitment towards transparency and client empowerment, we implore you to make use of the button below – which will provide insights on possible value estimations for your claim based on shared incident specifics. More than just offering prodigious legal services, Carlson Bier stands by facilitating connections between knowledge and rights recognition – assisting potential clients like yourself in making better-informed decisions concerning their well-being.

Be ahead of this seemingly daunting facet within injury law whilst understanding what could potentially affect your case’s outcome—another step closer towards gaining holistic closure one richly deserves when faced with an unfortunate event due to debilitated product quality. Be empowered with information, weighed down not by uncertainty but lifted by awareness as dollars mirror damage so done because perusal does propel power.

Subscribe now through clicking the button below — enlightening yourself about your probable claim value, embracing nimble navigation around legalese language littering paper walls enveloping unknowns whittling themselves into known territory teetering triumphantly towards deserved justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chicago Loop Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Chicago Loop

Areas of Practice in Chicago Loop

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending professional legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering specialist legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, offering skilled legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Professional in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Damages

Delivering legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Mishaps: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for harms and damages.

Motorbike Incidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Truck Crash

Offering expert legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Expert in ensuring expert legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440