Construction Site Accident Attorney in Cicero

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the bustling city of Cicero, construction sites are a common sight. Unfortunately, so too are accidents that happen in these areas. If you or someone you love has been affected by a Construction Site Accident, choosing competent legal representation is vital for securing justice and compensation. With unmatched expertise in this domain, Carlson Bier stands out as an undeniable choice for those grappling with such situations. Rooted strongly within Illinois law boundaries, this exceptional personal injury lawyer firm offers invaluable insight into Construction Site Accidents – every nuance and complexity expertly handled to ensure maximum benefit for their clients. At Carlson Bier, your welfare is our utmost priority; hence we strive tirelessly to navigate the litigation process – from shaping compelling cases to aggressive representation in courtrooms across Illinois state if needed.Whether it’s negotiating a fair settlement or arguing your case at trial- rest assured that serving justice is always at the heart of what we do here at Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Cicero Illinois

Navigating the maze of personal injury law can be daunting, especially when one’s life has been upended due to a construction site accident. Partnering with the skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier can make all the difference. We’re an Illinois-based personal injury law group profoundly committed to championing the rights of individuals who have sustained injuries on construction sites, where safety often gets compromised due to negligent actions.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that comprehension is key when dealing with complex legal scenarios related to construction site accidents. Henceforth, preparing our clients through offering substantive details about such incidents is at our heartstrings. Construction accidents primarily occur due to factors such as inappropriate use of equipment, inadequate training or supervision, insufficient protective gear amongst others.

• Faulty equipment or machinery: A substantial cause for onsite mishaps are defective pieces of machinery and poor maintenance practices.

• Lack of proper training: Sites may lack comprehensive standard operating procedures leading to misuse or abuse of tools and materials.

• Inadequate protective measures: There’s a critical need for stringent safety protocols and preventive guards which are usually deficient in many construction sites.

Ineffective Supervision: Skilled guidance guarantees efficiency but lack thereof perpetuates needless risk exposure hence more chances for unfortunate events.

When such negligence occurs despite laid down employment laws and safety regulations, injured parties have a right to seek justice for their plight. Our passion lies in not only representing those claimants but in fighting tooth and nail until equitable redress becomes decisive.

What sets us apart as Personal Injury Attorneys? At Carlson Bier we personify tenacity while maneuvering legal hurdle after another towards securing rightful compensation for you. Cognizant that each case exhibits unique dynamics concerning liability issues and potential avenues of recovery—we give every file individualized attention it duly deserves so no detail is left unaccounted.

Besides carrying your burden in trial preparations by gathering requisite evidence and expert opinion testimony; we pride ourselves in explaining and guiding our clients on different compensation streams available. These may cover past, present, and future medical expenses, wages lost during convalescence and other damages like pain or emotional distress.

We’re keen to give you peace of mind as we anchor relentless negotiations with insurance companies or responsible parties—tasks that are admittedly burdensome for an unrepresented claimant yet significantly vital in cementing a compelling case. At Carlson Bier, we bear the weight so you don’t have to.

With distinguished legal prowess backed by years of professional experience serving Illinois’s constituents, no one comprehends your predicaments like we do at Carlson Bier—Your trusted advisor on matters Personal Injury Law! We stop at nothing until justice is served; Your satisfaction is our crowning achievement!

Remember, together we stand up against injustice because your cause is our mission. It’s time to step into the empowering realm of knowledge where clarity meets resolve necessary in ensuring warranted returns from your case. Unwavering legal representation awaits you!

Anticipating what your personal injury case could be worth? Evaluating a client’s potential recovery takes more than general speculation—it requires well-honed proficiency to ensure accurate forecast informed by specificities particular to each case which includes factors like intensity of sustained injuries, liability determination among others.

Allow us too to bring clarity unto table by offering calculated estimates aligned towards helping alleviate psychological burden commonly tagged along uncertainty around possible outcomes spun out from nerve-wracking litigation episodes.Entrust it all unto capable hands that won’t let go until each stone gets turned and every likely avenue explored fully.

Every second counts towards building a robust lawsuit! Don’t delay any further but instead seize the opportunity before the odds pile up against favorability concerning lawful compensation eligibility period timelines.To make sure we can offer you timely intervention served hot on justice plate… why not click the button below now? Let’s dive deep into deciphering how much your case could be worth today with Carlson Bier. Do it now, clarity can’t wait!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cicero Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Cicero

Areas of Practice in Cicero

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending expert legal services for victims of major burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Negligence

Extending professional legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Fall Occurrences

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Providing legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents receive just compensation for damages and impairment.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Providing professional legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for damages.

Construction Collisions

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Focused on ensuring expert legal services for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Loss

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Damage

Focused on supporting victims with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer