FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Cornell

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to choosing a dependable Products Liability attorney, look no further than Carlson Bier. Armed with a concentrated expertise in the intricacies of Products Liability law and an impressive track record of success cases, we’re your most reliable ally for safeguarding your interests in challenging situations. Our legal services extend beyond borders because to us, geography is but logistics while commitment to justice is timeless and boundless. We serve clients all across Illinois including those requiring robust legal representation in Cornell city.

Our ethos pivots around providing personalized advice tailored to unique facets of diverse product liability cases – from defective drugs to unsafe appliances or automobile faults that resulted harm; our proven proficiency will be at works ceaselessly until you get rightful respite.

In this intricate domain where dealing with high-profile manufacturing corporations can seem intimidating, having Carlson Bier by your side could transform overwhelming odds into achievable breakthroughs! Not just another name on the list – we stand out as stalwarts through perseverance and unmatched dedication towards defending our clients’ best interests.

#AIlawyersTechnologyünchen

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Cornell Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we take great pride in our extensive experience and expertise as a personal injury attorney group operating within Illinois. One significant area of practice that we provide vital services for is Products Liability. This legal domain concerns the responsibility held by suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and retailers over the safety of products they bring to market. If any such product causes harm or injury to you, it’s crucial to understand your rights and legal options.

Products Liability is based on three main theories: negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty. Each one represents a distinctly different situation with its specific requirements for building your case successfully.

• Negligence refers to scenarios where harm resulted due to recklessness or carelessness during product design, manufacturing, or distribution process.

• Strict Liability pertains even if maximum care was taken during the production process; if an item is inherently dangerous and inflicts harm on a user – the manufacturer can still be held liable.

• Breach of Warranty involves cases where explicit (clearly stated) promises about a product’s performance or implicit (generally assumed) warranties are violated causing damage.

Our team at Carlson Bier will guide you through each step required in establishing your claim under these categories properly while safeguarding all necessary deadlines.

Furthermore, gathering substantial evidence stands pivotal for winning lawsuits related to Product Liability. Our experienced attorneys diligently work towards procuring key documents like medical records related to injuries sustained because of defective commodities. They also ensure obtaining testimonies from other victims and experts alongside purchasing records which confirm ownership — forming solid groundwork for effective litigation.

There may exist many challenges when pursuing compensation related to Product Liability claims – but persistence pays off rich dividends! Successfully litigating could lead you receiving damages corresponding not only towards medical expenses but also wages lost throughout recovery period besides compensatory amounts concerning emotional suffering inflicted upon you owing faulty goods causing physical impairment initially.

It’s also noteworthy mentioning unequivocally; every Products Liability situation bears unique circumstances warranting reliable legal representation. As a robust law firm, Carlson Bier’s attorneys possess profound knowledge and experience in Illinois’s jurisdiction guidelines which significantly amplifies success probabilities for compensation claims brought about via faulty products.

Moreover, we staunchly believe each injured victim deserves sincere advocate fighting on their behalf against those liable for causing harm through negligence or deliberate disregard towards safety norms related to product manufacture and distribution.

We cordially invite you to stay informed; ponder over given pointers for recognizing potential Product Liability scenarios promptly – ensuring well-deserved justice prevails ultimately with our competent legal representation safeguarding your rights relentlessly.

Here at Carlson Bier, personal injury is more than just another case – it’s about providing tireless support, unreserved dedication, and unwavering guidance toward pursuing legal retribution fitly deserved by our clients following ill-effects rendered by objects meant serving purpose but unexpectedly transforming into distress causeways instead individually.

Lastly, while the company cannot advertise as a personal attorney group located in Cornell due to Illinois laws’ restrictions around region-specific promotions without presence of any physical office network therein – rest assured that residents from every conceivable corner within this state can comfortably rely upon us for handling challenging cases efficiently concerning Personal Injury attributed predominantly towards Products Liability!

Now that you are more acquainted with what involves in Products Liability matters, consider pursuing your rightful claim momentarily. Please click the button below and find out how much your personalized case could be worth! Our team is keenly waiting to assist further – commence your journey towards receiving full-fledged compensation rightly corresponded with sustained injuries sincerely aided bu proficient legal navigation provided confidently by Carlson Bier at every crucial juncture crucial en route eventual triumph!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cornell Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Cornell

Areas of Practice in Cornell

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending adept legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Offering experienced legal support for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Trip Occurrences

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Extending expert legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cognitive Damages

Committed to delivering dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on supporting clients with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440