Construction Site Accident Attorney in Crescent City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a construction site accident disrupts your life, knowing what steps to take can be daunting. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in navigating the legal intricacies surrounding such unfortunate incidents. We understand that every situation is unique, therefore our skilled attorneys work meticulously to unravel each case’s specific details and complications. Our mission is not only providing unparalleled services but also striving for justice on behalf of victims involved in Crescent City Construction Site Accidents. With years of experience under our belt, we have garnered an unrivaled reputation for efficiently addressing and resolving these sensitive matters with utmost professionalism and care. The key to winning any lawsuit lies within meticulous preparation; thus at Carlson Bier – keen attention to detail is our guiding principle when representing you. Armed with vast knowledge about Illinois State laws concerning workplace accidents, we aim to ensure you attain deserved compensation while holding responsible parties accountable for their actions.

This exceptional dedication makes us a superior consideration if seeking out representation following a Construction Site Accident within Crescent City – which testifies why countless affected personnel turn towards the competent team at Carlson Bier confidently.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Crescent City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we take your personal injury cases with the rigorous attention and legal skill that they demand. Set in the heart of Illinois, our firm is widely recognized for its expertise, particularly in handling Construction Site Accident cases. As thousands of construction events are undertaken daily across the state, accidents unfortunately do occur from time to time – giving rise to possible personal injury claims.

In understanding Construction Site Accidents and related law procedures it’s important to recognize that sites can harbor various types of hazards – falling debris, machinery malfunction or even ladder mishaps just to name a few. Workers not only endure physical pain but also face financial strain due to medical bills and lost wages which often result from such incidents.

Here at Carlson Bier, each case begins with a comprehensive evaluation of the accident scene, ascertaining key factors like safety measures in place, third-party involvement if any–like equipment manufacturers or subcontractors–and assessing how these-induced complications contribute towards ultimate causation of injury.

Major considerations while dealing with Construction Site Accidents include:

• Identifying fault – Determining who is responsible goes beyond just blaming an employer; it may involve third parties.

• Understanding State Laws- Knowing regulations applicable can have significant impact on workers’ compensation claim process.

• Gathering evidence – A technician’s report on failed equipment or photographs showing lack of proper safety gear could be instrumental assets.

• Determining damages – This involves calculating loss endured by you including medical costs and wage losses.

For every client reaching out to us, we promise efficient navigation through these steps aided by high-quality expertise ingrained in Illinois Law alongside delivering top-grade support during this challenging phase. Our team ensures clients know their rights under Illinois worker’s compensation laws allowing them myriad benefits including medical care costs and personality disability benefits among others.

In addition, as experienced attorneys comprising team Carlson Bier understand that injuries suffered at construction sites cannot always be compensated fully via workers’ compensation insurance hence at times, a personal injury lawsuit against third parties involved may be necessary. Such recourse would not only compensate for monetary factors but also ‘pain and suffering’, which plays an intrinsic part in elevating your quality of life post-accident.

Understanding the complexities that come with Construction Site Accidents is essential, as it could drastically impact final compensations received. Our extensive experience allows us to adeptly navigate these intricacies; whether dealing with employers or insurance providers aiming to furnish lower settlements or dodge liabilities altogether.

With Carlson Bier on your side, you can rest assured knowing we fight relentlessly towards achieving fullest claims possible for every individual case taken on. We not only cater to immediate financial losses but advocate tirelessly for additional benefits deserved while coping with traumatic aftereffects of your ordeal.

We strongly believe nobody should withstand financial burdens from accidents they aren’t responsible for. If you’ve unfortunately been involved in a Construction Site Accident anywhere across Illinois, do not hesitate- reach out today. Remember time-specific nuances exist within this field of law marking swift action post-incident vital. At Carlson Bier, dedication towards ensuring every accident survivor receives just due is unwavering.

Empower yourself by reaching out to us immediately following such distressing incidents–not allowing thereby insurmountable delays brew concerns over the course of fair justice pursuit. Place trust within our proven record and outlet decades’ worth potent expertise commence working relentlessly on your behalf from day one itself!

Click on the button below—you’ll be pleasantly surprised decoding how much your case could ultimately be worth! With constructive guidance from our skilled team at hand—not only does recovery seem achievable—it’s right around the corner!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crescent City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Crescent City

Areas of Practice in Crescent City

Bicycle Collisions

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Providing expert legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Offering expert legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing adept legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Fall Accidents

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal assistance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents obtain just recompense for harms and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Incident

Providing expert legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Building Collisions

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Head Injuries

Committed to delivering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer