FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Cuba

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

With a deep-rooted commitment to justice, Carlson Bier is the premier choice for Products Liability legal representation. The firm’s sterling reputation in managing complex Product Liability cases has been built upon years of solid experience and unwavering dedication. Regardless of the complexity or scope of your case – from defective appliances to unsafe medical products or toxic substances – Carlson Bier diligently protects victims who suffer injuries as a consequence of unsafe products. Our well-regarded team understands every facet of Products Liability law and leverage this knowledge to secure fair compensation for our clients’ suffering and loss.

Despite the challenges that surround these types of lawsuits, we harbor an exceptional track record ensuring justice prevails. You can rely on unrivaled attention-to-detail, relentless negotiation skills, empathy with impeccable professionalism when represented by Carlson Bier in your Products Liability claim.

In choosing us as your advocate against multinational corporations’ negligence, you appoint a formidable force capable not only defending but championing your rights; This is why discerning individuals turn towards Carson Bier when they seek top-tiered Product liability attorneys adept at navigating challenging legal terrains effectively.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Cuba Illinois

When it comes to cases involving product liability in Illinois, trust the skilled legal professionals at Carlson Bier. Our experienced team of personal injury attorneys has a proven track record in handling these complex matters, positioning us as leaders within this particular niche. Product liability cases stem from incidents where a defect or malfunctioning product causes injurious harm to a consumer. This could range from faulty manufacturing and defective design, to inaccurate advertising and failure to provide appropriate safety instructions.

Product liability is more intricate than most perceive, encompassing a multitude of potential scenarios:

• Faulty Manufacturing: This involves situations where an error occurred during the production process resulting in defects that render the product dangerous for usage.

• Design Defects: Despite flawless manufacturing processes, certain products may possess inherent flaws which present unreasonable dangers when used as intended.

• Failure to Warn: Manufacturers are required to provide sufficient warning labels or instructions alerting consumers of potential risks associated with their product’s use.

Navigating such multifaceted legal terrain requires extensive knowledge and precise attention-to-detail – characteristics synonymous with our desktop lawyers at Carlson Bier. Personal injury law demands comprehensive understanding of various regulations and protocols; we empower our clients through educative engagement ensuring they fully comprehend all aspects relative to their case while confidently relying on us for exceptional legal representation.

At Carlson Bier, we represent individuals who have been adversely affected by unsafe products across different industries like pharmaceuticals, automotive manufacturers, children’s toys makers among others. We understand the trauma one experiences after being harmed by a supposedly safe item trusted by millions of consumers across Illinois State and indeed America as a whole.

Our exhaustive approach goes beyond merely identifying responsible parties – which can include wholesalers, retailers or even marketing agencies depending on circumstances surrounding your unique case – but also thorough analyzing evidentiary components strengthening your compensation claim against culpable entities involved in producing the harmful merchandise.

We pride ourselves not just on our knack for obtaining fair compensation for our distinguished clients but also leaving an indelible mark of safety enhancement within various industrial segments. This is because these litigations often necessitate manufacturers to review and consequently improve their products thereby protecting future consumers in the process – a feat we consider being our contribution toward society’s greater good.

Indeed, at Carlson Bier, the bedrock pillar underpinning our service delivery is client satisfaction; aside from securing maximum settlement awards – typically covering medical expenses, lost wages and compensation for emotional distress among others – we ensure you get your life back on track after an unfortunate encounter precipitated by defective merchandise marketed as safe for usage.

If you have been injured or harmed by a potentially faulty product, it’s important that you reach out to a competent personal injury attorney immediately. Time limitations are indeed critical when filing suit against manufacturers; waiting too long could render your case invalid evicting any possible compensatory award prospects.

Unsure whether your predicament classifies as product liability case? Do not worry. At Carlson Bier, we offer complimentary consultations ensuring individuals understand their rights and what legal options are available based on unique facts presented surrounding each individual occurrence. Make this crucial first step today: Simply click on the button below now and find out how much potentially substantial implicit value lies beneath your circumstance. You deserve restitution fittingly momentous compared to ordeal suffered through no fault of yours! Assert your tomorrow today with us right here at Carlson Bier – where justice is personalized just for you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cuba Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Cuba

Areas of Practice in Cuba

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Specializing in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving skilled legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering expert legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, providing professional legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Mishaps

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Incidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on aiding patients of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for wounds and losses.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Big Rig Accident

Providing experienced legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Focused on delivering professional legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Focused on defending victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440