FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Trucking Accident Attorney in Dayton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a trucking accident in Dayton, Carlson Bier is your premier source for legal representation to fight tirelessly for your rights. Boasting an impressive track record of successful incident investigations and claims negotiations involving large vehicles, this proficient team has won significant compensation for their clients. Their adeptness at interpreting intricate insurance policies always proves instrumental in securing maximum coverage benefits fairly and promptly – just one reason why embarking on the path towards justice with Carlson Bier makes sense after a catastrophic collision. The experts at our firm also deftly manage wrongful death cases resulting from fatal truck accidents while ensuring compassionate support throughout these painful times. Additionally, they’re versed with numerous federal regulations governing interstate haulers which bolsters their ability to prove fault effectively – a pivotal part displaying paramount competence as attorneys specializing in trucking accidents at National level. Put simply; whatever challenges emerge as fallout from perpetual highways’ towering juggernauts wields – trust the experienced team at Carlson Bier to guide you through every step of the legal journey convincingly assuring sagacity-at-law extrapolates into reassuring solace-in-life post-disaster!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Trucking Accident Lawyers in Dayton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in handling all aspects of trucking accident cases with our combined years of experience and deep commitment to secure the justice you deserve. Our dedication stems from a profound understanding that losing a loved one or sustaining serious injuries because of another’s negligence is an agonizing experience.

Trucking accidents often result in devastating consequences due to two primary reasons: the weight disparity between a regular car and commercial truck and complexities revolving around multiple parties being involved such as the truck driver, owner, maintenance team, or loading company. These factors can significantly influence how fault is assigned and who is held accountable for damages incurred after a truck accident.

Unlike common motor vehicle accidents, where primarily individual drivers are held responsible for mishaps on the road, determining liability in trucking accidents can involve numerous stakeholders which include drivers, employers, manufacturers among others. Understanding these layers wouldn’t be trouble-free without professional advice; hence having an expert attorney by your side remains essential.

There are several causes of truck-related accidents:

* Speeding – Trucks speeding over the limit might lead to potentially fatal collisions.

* Distracted driving – This includes eating behind the wheel or using electronic devices while driving.

* Driver fatigue – Federal laws regulate hours of service yet tiredness frequently proceeds deadly crashes.

* Inappropriate loads – Overloading trucks or improper load distribution leads to instability-induced disasters.

* Lack of proper maintenance – Regular inspections should always be performed to detect hidden issues before tragedy strikes.

When it comes to claiming compensation after your traumatic ordeal; based on Illinois law various claims could be pursued including but not limited to:

* Medical expenses both present and future

* Pain and suffering endured

* Loss of earnings if your capacity has been diminished

* Emotional distress especially following life-altering injuries

However complex a claim may appear initially; rest assured Carlson Bier will navigate through intricate legal principles leveraging our extensive knowledge base responsibly earned over many successful years practicing law. We also recognize each case has unique intricacies and subtleties hence we approach every client with personalized attention, intricate research and aggressive representation.

A plethora of assistance is available from our competent team; starting from a free evaluation to hook you up with full-on courtroom litigation if necessary. We walk the talk through each phase procuring critical evidence, investigating the scene, consulting expert witnesses alongside meticulous case construction that can withstand any opposition used against it strictly conforming to Illinois’ boundaries and legal regulations.

Our resilient commitment to your cause doesn’t bank on upfront fees or hidden costs rather reflects upon a contingent fee contract whereby we only receive payment when you do! In essence, Carlson Bier works on a ‘No Win-No Fee’ basis because your victory translates into ours as well – hence leaving no stone unturned in pursuing maximum compensation for bearing losses born out of someone else’s recklessness amidst the hustle-bustle of Illinois roads!

We humbly invite you to partner with us at this critical juncture where professional intervention could make a significant difference. To better comprehend how we can assist you and perhaps see what worth your case holds considering all nuances under Illinois law, please click on the button below without further delay! At Carlson Bier: Achieving Justice isn’t merely a promise but an unyielding commitment beyond mere words – every step along this challenging path is undertaken considering your best interests legally, ethically and compassionately!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dayton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Trucking Accident FAQ​

Trucking accidents are often caused by a combination of factors, including driver fatigue, mechanical failures, improper loading of cargo, speeding, and inadequate driver training. External factors like poor road conditions and bad weather can also contribute.

Safety first: move to a safe area if possible. Call emergency services for medical and police assistance. Document the scene with photos and notes, and gather contact information from witnesses and all involved parties. It’s also crucial to seek medical attention, even if you feel fine, as some injuries may not be immediately apparent.

Liability in trucking accidents can be complex. It may involve the truck driver, the trucking company, manufacturers of truck parts, or other third parties. An investigation will typically look into the driver’s actions, vehicle maintenance records, the trucking company’s compliance with regulations, and other factors to determine fault.

Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to various forms of compensation, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. In some cases, punitive damages might be awarded, especially if gross negligence or intentional misconduct is involved.

Trucking accidents often involve complex legal and regulatory issues. An attorney with experience in this field can navigate federal and state trucking laws, deal with large trucking companies and their insurers, and help ensure that you receive fair compensation. They can also assist in gathering evidence and expert testimonies necessary for building a strong case.

All Attorney Services in Dayton

Areas of Practice in Dayton

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying expert legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Providing specialist legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Neglect

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Trip Incidents

Skilled in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for hurts and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Accident

Delivering professional legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at tackling cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Undeserved Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Impairment

Expert in representing clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440