FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Downs

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering an injury from a construction site accident can be devastating. It teams you up with bills, pain, and uncertainty about the future. But when you choose Carlson Bier as your legal representation, you’re choosing assurance and solidarity in such challenging times. Our team at Carlson Bier are experienced Construction Site Accident attorneys who deeply understand the complexities of Illinois law pertaining to workplace accidents. We listen attentively to your unique situation; meticulously examine every detail of your case; then we devise a strategic plan that aims for fair compensation in line with Illinois law’s provisions—allowing us to advocate effectively on behalf of our clients in Downs.

Our approach is always tactical yet compassionate—taking into account not only the cold hard facts but also the warm truth behind each client’s story. With our deep understanding of labor laws and extensive experience representing construction workers’ rights, Carlson Bier guarantees relentless advocacy until justice meets satisfaction. Choose clarity over confusion post-accident–choose Carlson Bier: ensuring justice for construction site injuries across Downs.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Downs Illinois

Carlson Bier Associates is a highly reputable personal injury law firm rooted in Illinois. As specialists in the field, our primary focus is to represent clients who have experienced injuries due to construction site accidents. With an unwavering commitment to securing just compensation for victims, we demonstrate thorough expertise and deep understanding of applicable laws and regulations pertaining to these unfortunate incidents.

Construction sites can be complex locations with inherent hazards that may lead to unforeseen injuries or accidents. Some prominent risks include falls from height, scaffolding collapses, trench cave-ins, electric shocks, among numerous others. However daunting these cases might seem at first glance, those afflicted should remember – rights exist that protect you from bearing the brunt of such mishaps. Identifying key elements associated with construction site accidents significantly informs the lawsuit proceedings:

• Negligence – Perhaps one of the most critical facets lies in establishing negligence on someone’s part at the construction site which led directly or indirectly to an injury.

• Duty of Care – Employers have a legal obligation or duty of care towards their employees’ safety while on-site.

• Breach – When this duty is not adequately observed resulting in harm/damage qualifies as a breach.

• Causation – The onus lies upon demonstrating causally how this breach resulted in any form of physical/mental injury.

Our team endeavors tirelessly investigating every crucial detail about your case. Furthermore, we work alongside industry experts delivering useful insights into unique experiences encountered by workers within work sites under diverse circumstances.

We acknowledge that these misfortunate events transpire unexpectedly and can inflict not only physical pain but emotional distress along with financial strain caused by lost wages and high medical expenses. At Carlson Bier Associates, we are dedicated to fighting vigorously for justice ensuring you receive fair compensation deserved—restoring normalcy and facilitating recovery during challenging times.

While exploring this avenue further educates individuals about indispensable aspects relevant to such lawsuits; it certainly doesn’t substitute expert legal advice. That is where we step in, supporting you throughout every stage – commencing from initial consultation through all hearings and trial or settlements.

Although laws governing construction site accidents vary across states, Illinois Law substantially leans towards the favor of harmed employees in these cases. Workers Compensation Act (WCA) intends averting disputes between employers and workers concerning potential injuries at work sites; primarily by instating Worker’s Comp Insurance. This coverage reimburses medical treatment expenses along with two-thirds of any lost wage during recuperation.

Despite such Jeffersonian safeguard-oriented measures, certain situations might still warrant personal injury lawsuits to recover damages that Worker’s Comp fails to encompass entirely, like compensation for pain or suffering. Thus it becomes imperative adopting tactical maneuvers navigating such intricate legal landscapes successful—something Carlson Bier Associates excels in effortlessly.

Having represented scores of similar cases throughout our expansive history practicing law, we have honed comprehensive skills indispensable achieving gratifying results irrespective of how convoluted a case might appear initially. Dedication corroborated with empathy has consistently fueled us organically maturing as the trusted choice among clients facing challenges due to construction site accidents.

Feeling bewildered navigating this maze isn’t uncommon—but remember—you don’t have to go alone at it. We invite you hereby reaching out to us with your queries choosing neither to despair nor settle but instead fight dedicatedly seeking justice and fair reimbursement entitled rightfully for suffered damages due construction site accidents.

Wouldn’t it be reassuring know exactly what your case is worth? Click on the button below being one step closer assessing how much compensation could potentially adhere awaiting claim—and remember—we stand alongside guiding each stride while maneuvering these intricate terrains! So why wait longer than necessary when help remains just click away on Carlson Bier?

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Downs Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Downs

Areas of Practice in Downs

Bicycle Incidents

Specializing in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Offering specialist legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Medical Negligence

Delivering professional legal assistance for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal support to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Stumble Injuries

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking justice for their damages.

Birth Harms

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents gain just recompense for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Collision

Offering specialist legal services for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Expert in ensuring specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in handling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Harm

Focused on supporting victims with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440