FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Dwight

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one becomes the victim of an unfortunate spinal cord injury in Dwight, Carlson Bier emerges as your strongest advocate. Housing a dedicated team of experts with comprehensive understanding and expertise regarding Spinal Cord Injury Law, they go above and beyond to ensure that your rights are effectively represented in all proceedings. By delving into each unique case’s details, we provide personalized legal strategies and support at every step of this challenging journey. Our efforts don’t end merely at attaining rightful compensation for you; we strive tirelessly towards ensuring optimal rehabilitation opportunities so you can live an independently fulfilling life post-injury. At Carlson Bier, our empathy coupled with relentless professionalism makes winning not just a possibility but more so, a common outcome. We stand beside each client determinately on the path of justice because when it comes to spinal cord injuries it’s about getting more than what was lost; it is about securing hope for tomorrow irrespective of today’s adversity. Trust us to serve as your robust pillar amid times where strength seems elusive – trust Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Dwight Illinois

At the law firm Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases, with a focus on assisting victims of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs). Navigating the aftermath of a serious injury can be daunting but our Illinois-based team is here to help clarify your situation and guide you through every step necessary for your recovery.

Spinal cord injuries often result from traumatic events such as motor vehicle accidents, falls or acts of violence. Their severity and implications largely depend upon the location of the injury in relation to the spinal column:

• Cervical spinal cord injuries (C1-C7 vertebrae) affect both arms and legs and may result in quadriplegia.

• Thoracic spinal cord injuries (T1-T12 thoracic vertebrae), depending on their extent, can result in paraplegia.

• Lumbar spinal cord injuries could lead to loss of function in hips and legs.

• Sacral spinal cord injuries might impact function in hips, legs or even pelvic organs.

SCI survivors frequently face lifelong challenges such as weakened immune system, breathing difficulties or pressure sores. The degree of these complications varies from case to case. No matter how severe your SCI is though, remember it’s crucial that you get legal assistance as soon as possible.

This assistance goes beyond merely filing a lawsuit; it involves understanding rehabilitation costs – including physical therapy expenses, adaptive equipment costs – adjusting homes for accessibility purposes, round-the-clock nursing care costs among others. This understanding helps us advocate effectively for full compensation which not only accounts for present medical bills but also future needs resulting from altered lifestyle due to SCI.

Most importantly at Carlson Bier, we understand each client’s unique circumstances necessitating an individualized approach when seeking justice. We ask tough questions of insurance companies because we are invested completely in safeguarding your rights while obtaining fair settlements that cater comprehensively for past medical bills and projected future expenses resulting from SCI. This has over the years seen us command respect and build formidable relationships with insurance companies, making them less likely to challenge our claims.

Additionally, we operate on a contingency basis which means that you pay no attorney fees unless we achieve a successful result for your case. A personal injury claim connected to Spinal Cord Injury is not merely about monetary compensation – it’s fundamentally about justice and ensuring a secure future amidst unexpected life changes.

Knowledge of how SCIs can affect lives often leads to realization of the importance of specialized legal counsel in this domain. By choosing Carlson Bier as your representatives, you are opting for specialists who prioritize advocating relentlessly to ensure that your rights are upheld while you focus on recovery. Our compassionate representation offers peace of mind during uncertain times cultivating renewed hope for brighter days ahead.

Our commitment resonates far beyond legal services; standing by each client as they navigate their new reality resulting from an SCI forms part of our core principles at Carlson Bier affirming our dedication towards achieving positive outcomes in challenging circumstances.

Should all these sound helpful or intriguing enough, do not hesitate to contact us and benefit from a free initial consultation where we’ll discuss specifics related to your spinal cord injury case without any obligation whatsoever. Our experienced team finds great satisfaction in turning around difficult situations into victories aligning with our mission statement ‘Your Rights Restored’.

Now is the time to begin assessing just how much you stand eligible for owing to your Spinal Cord Injury related lawsuit through personalized attention coupled with expert legal advice only available at Carlson Bier. Reach out today by clicking the button below and let us help ascertain what might be due payable as awarded damages based upon painstaking evaluation of individual circumstances surrounding respective cases within context of applicable Illinois laws – because everyone deserves dedicated representation when faced with life-altering events such as SCI.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dwight Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Dwight

Areas of Practice in Dwight

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Extending expert legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering specialist legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal help to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Fall Injuries

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for harms and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Accident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in offering dedicated legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Expert in advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440