Construction Site Accident Attorney in East Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In East Garfield Park and the neighboring environs, construction site accidents are an unfortunate reality. If such a mishap befalls you or a loved one, Carlson Bier is equipped with vast expertise to provide solid legal representation. As dedicated personal injury attorneys in Illinois, we comprehend the complexities that envelope construction accident laws and compensation claims. Our invaluable experience representing numerous construction workers harmed on-site underpins our ability to seek rightful restitution for clients vigorously. Leveraging sharp negotiation skills coupled with adept investigative tactics; we aim to win favorable settlements early in proceedings ensuring minimal inconvenience to victims already burdened by injuries. Our unerring commitment towards every client involves leaving no stone unturned when probing cause of accidents uncovering evidence vital in supporting your claim robustly at trial if required! At Carlson Bier, compassion meets tenacity as we commit ourselves fully to safeguard your best interests while navigating through challenging litigation processes after construction site accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in East Garfield Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that a construction site accident can be devastating, often leading to life-changing injuries. Not only does this have an enormous physical impact on the individual directly affected, but it also brings about significant emotional and financial distress for the whole family. We’re deeply committed to providing comprehensive legal support to guide you through such challenging times.

Construction work is generally classified as high-risk job due to its inherent hazards. According to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the “Fatal Four” or four most common types of fatal accidents on-site are falls, getting struck by objects, electrocutions, and caught-in/between incidents. Other potential risks include equipment related accidents, exposure to harmful substances over time or fire explosions. Nevertheless, employers are obligated under Illinois law to maintain safety standards that protect workers from these threats.

Navigating legal complexities post a construction accident requires professional experience as there’s involvement of multiple state and federal laws alongside issues linked with insurance claims – something individuals aren’t typically equipped with.

This is where we step in – our team of Illinois personal injury attorneys will seamlessly handle your case from inception till resolution while holding all liable parties accountable.

Carlson Bier prides itself on offering:

• Comprehensive Consulting: Post an accident, understanding whether you have a valid compensation claim can be complex but our attorney provides an initial free consultation detailing exactly this so you know how strong your case stands.

• Detailed Case Examination: Our lawyers meticulously review each minor detail of your incident ensuring fair compensation against medical expenses caused due to negligence. This includes examining incident reports else identifying any omitted details that could strengthen claims.

• Proactive Representation: Timeliness is crucial within personal injury lawsuits hence at Carlson Bier; every request is responded promptly while vigorously representing clients in court or negotiations securing just settlements.

• Extensive Network of Experts: Often proving liability in construction incidents may require expert witnesses notably engineers or building inspectors who can drop light on neglected safety measures –something Carlson Bier has access to amidst its credible resources.

• Emotional Support: We believe in extending beyond the courtroom, providing moral support and empathetic understanding of your traumatic experience.

In a personal injury claim related to construction mishaps specifically, it’s possible to pursue compensation for an array of damages, such as medical bills, rehabilitation costs, lost earnings (past and future), pain and suffering or more depending upon each unique situation. At Carlson Bier we further ensure that if any workers’ compensation benefits have been received those are coordinated with other potential recovery sources so you receive maximum due remuneration without any discrepancies.

Our success rests largely upon our unflinching dedication to hold negligent parties accountable while ensuring victims rightfully obtain what they deserve amidst time bound manner helping our clients move ahead from this trauma towards brighter days.

Standing strong on values of trustworthiness, empathy and relentless commitment; Carlson Bier is by your side when it matters most ensuring justice in your corner. Numerous Illinois residents that served as satisfied testimonies witnessing life getting back on track right after their devastating events stand proof of this testament.

Navigating through legal process following severe construction accidents could be overwhelming but partnering with experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier would not only mitigate this stress but also fortify chances of obtaining just compensation against incurred damages. Would you not want deserving results offering peace of mind? Then it’s time for action clicking the button below for a free consultation determining how much your case is worth – because you certainly deserve every bit! Remember timely action compounds better outcomes; hence delay no further!

Serving silent sufferers, healing crushed spirits every step along the way toward justice –that essentially sums up Carlson Bier at heart investing best efforts securing favourable verdicts- because we genuinely care! Trust us today standing stronger tomorrow!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For East Garfield Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in East Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in East Garfield Park

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying adept legal services for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing expert legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering expert legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents receive just settlement for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Extending professional legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Focused on delivering specialized legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Dedicated to advocating for persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer