FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Essex

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In light of the dynamic and complicated nature of Products Liability law, seeking professional legal representation is crucial. The Carlson Bier team stands as an unmatched choice for such counsel in Essex. Their sterling reputation ascends from their steadfast commitment to fighting for their clients’ rights and delivering exceptional results within Products Liability cases. The firm’s highly credentialed attorneys possess extensive experience with product defect lawsuits, tracing fault to its source – whether it’s faulty design or manufacturing error. They are zealous advocates who comprehend impacting laws, ensuring that victims are rightfully compensated when injured by defective products. Moreover, they lead a meticulous investigation supporting each claim, unearthing essential facts that bolster the case strategy considerably. Consult Carlson Bier if you’re seeking proficient legal representation in dealing with manufacturers or sellers who’ve allowed hazardous products into consumers’ hands without appropriate warnings or safeguards set in place – They champion high standards of professionalism and client service alongside unparalleled expertise within complex parameters of Product Liability Law in Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Essex Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on serving as trusted advocates for those who have been personally injured due to the negligence of others. Our firm is steeped in extensive experience and a deep commitment to client service. One significant area of personal injury law that greatly impacts our clients’ lives is product liability – an intricate field that demands thorough knowledge and seasoned expertise.

Understanding product liability revolves unequivocally around the concept that manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, and vendors are held accountable if their products cause harm or injury to consumers. Herein lies the necessity for every stage in a product’s life cycle – from conception to consumption- to be meticulously reviewed for potential defects or shortcomings.

Product Liability can further be subdivided into three critical categories:

• Defectively manufactured products: This occurs when errors transpire in the course of a product’s production process making it unsafe.

• Design defects: These flaws emerge from intrinsic, hazardous design elements present even before manufacturing.

• Failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions about how to use a product safely can also be a form of Product Liability.

Keeping these crucial considerations in mind, victim recourse following an incident necessitating a product liability claim becomes paramount. As your dedicated legal partner, Carlson Bier will fight tenaciously for you by performing rigorous investigations; pinpointing liable parties; documenting all associated medical costs; advocating fiercely during settlement negotiations and tirelessly litigating your case in court if required.

Carlson Bier champions strict diligence coupled with strategic agility while navigating complex litigation landscapes inherent in Products Liability Cases. We understand that during such difficult times , your focus should primarily revolve around physical recovery and emotional healing without being burdened by reciprocal legal complexities .

We want you to know that all Illinois residents have rights under consumer protection laws which demand responsible parties compensate victims adequately for their suffering caused by defective or dangerous products . The financial implications from your ordeal might pile up over time but rest assured, we‘re committed to procure settlements that cover lost wages, medical expenses, pain and suffering and potentially punitive damages too.

At Carlson Bier our approach remains personalised – no cookie-cutter strategies. We strive to completely understand your unique circumstances before crafting a customized legal plan meant solely for you. Believe us when we say no two cases are the same nor should they be treated as any less significant .

Our ethos is not only about winning product liability lawsuits but also implementing such affirmative verdicts as catalysts for industry-level change in product safety standards thus ensuring future such mishaps meet a preventive dead end. By setting stronger precedents in favor of afflicted victims it ultimately disincentivizes manufacturers from cutting corners where consumer safety is concerned .

The journey towards recovery following a personal injury can be daunting, chaotic even . But remember – You do not walk alone on this path . As dedicated Illinois based Personal Injury attorneys we pledge our undeterred support , guidance and unyielding representation until justice echoes loudly across every corner of your case .

If you’ve been injured due to a defective or hazardous product whose fault was not yours at all, you understandably want to decipher how much compensation can potentially alleviate your financial burdens.We invite you with open arms to click on the button below that will route you directly towards our bespoke ‘Case Value Calculator’. Arm yourself with awareness regarding potential monetary outcomes related specifically to product liability claims – an informed client is always better suited whilst navigating tricky litigious junctions. Bear in mind – All victories begin with us standing rigorously anchor beside ‘You’, precisely where true partnership blooms!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Essex Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Essex

Areas of Practice in Essex

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing skilled legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing skilled legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Tumble Incidents

Expert in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for injuries and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Accident

Ensuring expert legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Building Accidents

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Harms

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Harm

Committed to defending patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440