FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Fairfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the complex world of products liability law, it is crucial to have legal advocates who have in-depth knowledge and an unwavering commitment to justice. At Carlson Bier, our dedicated team offers just that. Our team of formidable attorneys has made its mark by offering superior representation in Fairfield for a myriad of products liability issues. Beyond being well-versed with Illinois laws, we possess vast experience handling diverse cases from faulty appliances causing harm, contaminated food leading to illness or defective vehicle parts resulting in accidents. We prioritize your rights as a consumer and tirelessly work towards securing you fair compensation; should you suffer harm from procuring or using any product that falls short of safety standards required by law? As clients’ champions at Carlson Bier, flawless litigation strategies coupled with assertive negotiation skills are used ensuring maximum benefits for our clients. When seeking effective advocacy amidst tumultuous Products Liability-related disputes trust no less than the best – The unparalleled skill set and customer-centric approach offered by Carlson Bier beckons!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Fairfield Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your dedicated personal injury law firm right in the heart of Illinois. With keen expertise and fearless determination, we help our clients navigate through unruly waters following an unfortunate incident caused by defective products. If you’ve suffered due to a faulty product or inadequate warnings on them, you need not walk this journey alone – let us stride with you every step of the way.

A significant component of personal injury law revolves around Products Liability – a legal domain under which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, and retailers can be held responsible for harm caused due to their products reaching consumers in an unsafe condition or without appropriate safety warnings.

• Defective Design: This claim postulates that although properly manufactured, every unit from a certain line tends to pose serious risk due to ill-conceived design.

• Manufacturing Flaw: Even if designed impeccably, specific units may end up defective due to errors during the production process.

• Inadequate Warnings/Instructions: A product may necessitate explicit cautionary instructions regarding its usage; failing which unsafe conditions leading to injuries can occur.

Bear in mind that as per Illinois state laws governing Products Liability cases, it’s mandatory for proving that:

• The product was indeed flawed;

• The flaw resulted in direct injury/damage;

• Usage of the said product was aligned with the intent (either implicit or implied) as guided by manufacturers/suppliers;

Being at odds against Product liability claims can seem daunting but not when you have attorneys from Carlson Bier standing sternly by your side. We understand that analyzing complex causation aspects revolving around legal battles might come across as intimidating and baffling hence we take immense pride in breaking down these complexities into digestible elements for you. Our goal is not just winning lawsuits but also enlightening our clients about various nuances pertaining to their case.

Carlson Bier brings unique value because our modus operandi leans heavily towards meticulous case evaluation followed by careful strategization. Our attorneys bring a combined experience of meticulously dissecting various facets, going beyond the surface details to ensure that no aspect goes unchecked.

• Personalized attention – Every case is unique and deserves individualized scrutiny.

• Vast Expertise – Years of focused dedication have equipped us with comprehensive product liability knowledge which we leverage for your benefit.

• Detailed evaluation – We delve into intricate details to identify all liable entities in your claim.

• Unyielding representation – Armed with evidence, we represent you tirelessly till justice is served.

If the treacherous aftermath of an incident involving product liability has left you grappling for reprieve, remember that help is just one click away. Our dedicated team focuses not only on helping victims surmount their financial hurdles but also works relentlessly towards ensuring physical and emotional wellness post-the unfortunate scenario.

At Carlson Bier our mission holds an implicit promise; diligent service to provide you with absolute legal support as you face the trials posed by Product Liability claims.

So why wait? There’s much to gain from seeking professional help if you’ve suffered due to product liability. Click on the button below now! Find out what suitably tailored legal services from Carlson Bier can secure for you in terms of compensation so that life doesn’t need to be put on hold. Better yet, know how much your case could potentially be worth!

The road to recovery does not have to be walked alone. Lean on Carlson Bier for propelling your journey towards recuperation armed with complete access to rightful recompense for damages experienced due to faulty products or missing hazard warnings. With us standing firmly beside you, justice isn’t just a distant dream but tangible reality within reach.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that: 1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages; 2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and 3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed. The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that: 1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and 2 setoff clauses were enforceable. Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted. Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that: 1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and 2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits. Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fairfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Fairfield

Areas of Practice in Fairfield

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing adept legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering expert legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal support to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Professional in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents get reasonable recompense for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Offering professional legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in ensuring dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Committed to advocating for persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440