Construction Site Accident Attorney in Farmer City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you experience a construction site accident in Farmer City, it is urgent to seek the professional assistance of an experienced and compassionate attorney group like Carlson Bier. With deep roots in Illinois, our specialized team understands the intricacies of state laws concerning accidents on construction sites. Our firm adeptly articulates your rights and meticulously builds solid cases that factor in all prevailing circumstances leading to such unsettling incidents. We represent clients astutely from initial case review up to court representation if required. When dealing with subsequent consequences such as lost wages due to injuries sustained or medical bills not covered by insurance plans resulting from these unfortunate events, it’s crucial you have legal experts at your side. In punishingly complex affairs like these, having trustworthy allies can make all the difference for peaceful recovery while maintaining financial stability – That’s where Carlson Bier steps into play; It isn’t just about winning a case but restoring normalcy after an unsettling event in life has thrown off boat balance! Switch towards determination with us by contacting Carlsson Beir today!

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Farmer City Illinois

As your trusted personal injury legal advisors in Illinois, Carlson Bier establishes itself as the staunch advocate for those victimized by construction site accidents. The devastation caused by such mishaps is often unparalleled, both physically and emotionally. Moreover, it can wreak havoc on your financial stability and peace of mind. Our team at Carlson Bier comprises seasoned attorneys specializing in carve out robust compensation claims for injury victims.

Construction sites inherently entail a series of potential dangers due to their dynamic nature. These hazards may range from falls from heights or ladders, equipment-related injuries to electrical shocks and exposure to harmful materials along with psychological trauma. These incidences can lead to critical injuries or tragically even death, rendering them catastrophically life-changing events.

• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) violations: Many construction site accidents are a direct result of OSHA violations that involve poorly maintained workspaces, lack of proper safety training or failure to provide suitable safety gear.

• Equipment malfunctions: Unreliable heavy-duty vehicles, hand tools, or machinery failure can deliver fatal blows leading to serious harm.

• Neglectful action: Unsafe actions taken either by coworkers or other individuals around the worksite may cause hazardous repercussions.

Considering these perilous scenarios underscores the need for proficient legal representation like Carlson Bier through this complex process.

Understanding liability precedence is crucial while analyzing who should bear responsibility for any incurred damages during a construction accident. In certain cases, multiple parties might be held accountable inducing intricacy within litigation proceedings:

• A contractor’s negligence

• Defective equipment manufacturers

• Premises owner’s irresponsibility

Our law firm focuses on replicating our client’s anguish into measurable monetary relief attainable under Illinois law. Every case varies in context; however, we persistently seek maximum recovery possible comprising lost earnings resulting from an ability impairment while working post-accident status.

We bestow diligent attention towards procuring medical bills expenses covering current and future probable treatments, reimbursement for any lasting disability or disfigurement, reparation for emotional distress and psychological trauma alongside potential punitive damages if the injury was a consequence of awful misconduct.

Carlson Bier extends its services beyond representing merely financial aspects. Our compassionate lawyers comprehend the intricacies of these unfortunate circumstances. We stand by your side during these challenging times providing professional advice on how to navigate through various insurance claims while maintaining our primary focus on achieving favorable outcomes for you.

Your case’s worth is extensively studied under microscopic attention by our expert attorneys who are well-versed in all facets of personal injury law relevant to construction site accidents. Their astute knowledge combined with unflagging determination enables them to analyze each case meticulously leading towards obtaining deserved compensation rights.

Taking steps early after an accident can prove instrumental in strengthening your claim. Prompt reporting, preserving photographic evidence, getting immediate medical treatment and acquiring eye witness testimonies could potentially uplift your claim’s credibility.

As per your convenience, we encourage free virtual consultations guided further by follow-ups – be it via phone calls or emails from our approachable team ensuring no query goes unheard or ambiguous prior to proceeding forward with Carlson Bier.

To realize the potential of your claim in tangible terms click on the button below allow Carlson Bier’s adept attorneys evaluate precisely how much your case is worth. Trust us as we embark together converting this distressing phase into a journey towards justified recovery!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Farmer City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Farmer City

Areas of Practice in Farmer City

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending adept legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Misconduct

Extending professional legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal help to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Professional in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents secure fair settlement for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Truck Accident

Ensuring adept legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Building Incidents

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Focused on delivering dedicated legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and adept legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Dedicated to advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer