FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Flanagan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or your loved ones have become victims of a construction site accident in Flanagan, the experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier can provide the legal assistance you need. Recognized for our expertise in personal injury law, we understand how to navigate complex cases involved with construction accidents and are committed to fighting for your rightful benefits and compensation. At Carlson Bier, every lawyer is well-versed in Illinois law governing such situations – ensuring that your best interests remain protected while seeking justice against any negligent parties. It’s essential to retain qualified representation who comprehends the nuances of these claims as swiftly as possible following an incident. Our commitment and focus on achieving favorable outcomes for all clients make us one of the highest-rated options within this practice area. Taking into consideration both emotional distress that arises from these incidents and regulations surrounding these occurrences – choosing Carlson Bier means entrusting skilled professionals devoted to assisting those impacted by potentially life-altering circumstances like construction site accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Flanagan Illinois

The law firm of Carlson Bier understands that accidents are an unfortunate, and sometimes unavoidable, part of life. They can occur anywhere, at any time – a fact that construction workers know all too well. These hardworking individuals often find themselves in high-risk situations and dangerous environments every day they go to work which makes them particularly susceptible to Workplace Accidents. At Carlson Bier, we’re experts in advocating for victims of Construction Site Accidents.

Construction site workers labor with heavy machinery, perilous heights, harmful substances, and other potentially fatal hazards daily. When these dangers lead to accidents due to safety protocol negligence or equipment malfunction among others reasons; it not only poses grave physical harm but significantly affects the victim’s emotional health and living standards as well.

When you’re dealing with major incidents such as falling from great heights while on job sites such as buildings or bridges under construction; injuries arising from being struck by objects like large tools or building materials hoisted aloft; incidents involving electrocution when power lines aren’t properly managed during construction projects or even injuries sustained due to poorly maintained machinery- each accident event needs careful case formulation.

With our vast experience and legal acumen in personal injury law domain:

• We meticulously dissect each individual case.

• Assessing all possible variables that led up to the incident.

• Determining if there was a negligent entity responsible.

• Uncover clues invisible to untrained eyes.

• Work tirelessly to establish a solid legal lucid argument aiming towards obtaining maximum compensation possible for our clients’ pain & suffering alongside potential loss of wages among other redemptions.

Navigating through conflicting statements and complex documentation is not something the injured party should burden themselves with after undergoing such trauma. That’s where our team swoops in – taking over your battles while you focus on recovery.

Our proficiency isn’t limited solely to handling cases with discernible culpable parties. Sometimes things aren’t crystal clear cut as worker’s compensation claims poses their own unique challenges which not every law firm is equipped to handle. But fear not – whether it’s about combating vocal insurance companies who may try and convince you that your claim isn’t as substantial as it rightly should be or dealing with employers engineering complicated corporate loophole escape routes; Carlson Bier boasts a commendable success rate in securing fair reparations for our clients.

Our commitment doesn’t end once a lawsuit is filed. We are devoted to staying by your side until the very end through thick and thin, supporting throughout this legal journey, guiding towards making informed decisions, offering empathetic ears alongside expert advice.

We firmly believe everyone deserves access to high-quality personal injury representation whomever they might be regardless of financial status – hence no upfront fees from our clients unless we win cases in their favor. The moment you choose us to represent you, you’ve hired diligent lawyers dedicatedly working towards securing justice.

Accidents happen abruptly pulling ground off one’s feet causing disarraying turmoil whilst demanding immediate legal actions. Not knowing how much your case is worth can add fuel to this unsettling confusion. Let us alleviate some of that stress by allowing us to assess comprehensive aspects related to your accident case invoking rightful compensation claims. Don’t let niggling worries fester longer than necessary; take control of your situation now! Engage in an effortless click on the button below and see where your robust injury claim stands against Illinois laws with Carlson Bier today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Flanagan Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Flanagan

Areas of Practice in Flanagan

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering skilled legal services for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Extending expert legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, delivering adept legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Stumble Mishaps

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents gain equitable payout for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Crash

Offering experienced legal support for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for harms.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Head Harms

Committed to providing professional legal services for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Specializing in advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440