Products Liability Attorney in Fowler

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal recourse for injuries or damages resulting from faulty products, it’s crucial to engage a proficient Products Liability lawyer. That’s where Carlson Bier comes in—your trusted ally in the complex field of Product Liability law. Curating a robust legacy built on resolve and expertise, our team specializes in holding manufacturers accountable for their negligence in design, construction or distribution of unsafe goods. Our dedicated lawyers unravel potential complications surrounding such cases with aplomb; their diverse experience ensuring you benefit not just from the broad scope of understanding but also strategic insights specific to your individual case. From providing comprehensive advice during the initial consultation phase to relentless representation at trial level proceedings, Carlson Bier endeavors to uphold client interests every step along your claim journey cellsential integrity distinguishing us within Illinois’ competitive legal landscape is reflected our successful litigation history further attesting unmatched service proposition why considering should be given utmost precedence you face liability incident remember name stands synonymous with protection against negligent manufacturing Fowler can trust attain justice deserve

About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Fowler Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a premier personal injury attorneys group renowned for our expertise and unrivalled success in handling complex product liability cases. Strategically located in Illinois, we serve injured victims across the state by offering first-rate legal representation to those affected by faulty or harmful products.

Products Liability is an area of law wherein manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, and retailers can be held liable if their products cause injury or harm to consumers due to defects or malfunctioning components. Under this realm of law, there exist three primary types of product defects that could result in major lawsuits:

• Design Defects: These are inherent flaws that make a product dangerous when used as intended.

• Manufacturing Defects: Such defects emerge during the production process where something goes wrong causing the final product to become unsafe.

• Warnings/Labeling Defects: Failure on part of the manufacturer to provide adequate warnings about potential risks or clear instructions for safe usage.

Understanding how Products Liability Law operates is crucial because it holds manufacturers accountable for any damage caused by their products; thereby amplifying consumer safety measures and standards within industries. It also serves as a fundamental relief pathway for victims who’ve suffered from such mishaps—enabling them to seek restitution for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering along with other potential damages caused by defective products.

With decades of deep-rooted experience under our belt at Carlson Bier, we’re equipped with extensive knowledge pertaining not just to local state laws but also federal regulations governing Products Liability. Together with you as our esteemed client, we meticulously scrutinize every detail surrounding your case—from investigating the exact nature of the defect that led to injury right down to methodically filing all necessary paperwork to ensure you receive due compensation.

Key considerations when dealing with product liability cases include preserving evidence (the defective product), obtaining timely medical treatment documentation while simultaneously categorizing and calculating damages rightly owed—all endeavors best overseen by experienced attorneys such as the team at Carlson Bier.

The road towards claiming justice in product liability cases is often laden with hurdles—from manufacturer denials to insurance companies’ complex jargon. Yet, we stand firm in upholding your rights and navigating these challenges on your behalf.

Our resolute commitment to truth, justice, and maximal client compensation truly sets us apart. Throughout our aspiring journey representing countless parties traumatized by harmful products, we’ve amassed unparalleled expertise that empowers us to devise viable legal strategies that secure favorable outcomes for you.

Remember—when it comes to product liability lawsuits; timeliness is of utmost importance! The sooner you reach out to an attorney post-incurring injuries from a flawed product—the better equipped they are with fresh evidence which culminates in stronger case-building opportunities.

If you believe that faulty merchandise has subjected you or your loved ones to undue harm or distress—it’s high time you took proactive strides towards seeking just reparations. Let’s work together crafting a solid foolproof claim showcasing how manufacturer negligence resulted not just in catastrophic repercussions bridging financial hardship but also culminated in inevitable emotional trauma thus disrupted lives irreversibly.

Place trust and confidence into capable hands—that being Carlson Bier—we’re more than prepared tackling intricate scenarios characteristic of Product Liability Lawsuits. In this veritable battle against formidable negligent corporations—rest assured knowing we’ll put our best foot forward fanning flames of justice till victory shines upon your cause!

We eagerly invite you now—to take a pivotal step towards determining what your case is worth; after all there exists no harm only potential gain! Hover over that button below awaiting your click—let’s explore together supporting data validating potentially massive compensatory amounts rightfully owed! Claim back control over life disruptions caused by erring producers let us guide through labyrinthine legal proceedings uncovering immense possibility! Click NOW expressing interest—and move one giant stride closer unveiling monumental reparation value encrypted within your case! Welcome aboard the Carlson Bier powerhouse—we await transcending legal journeys turning tides of justice favoring your rightful cause!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fowler Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Fowler

Areas of Practice in Fowler

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving adept legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Providing professional legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Obligation

Handling cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents receive reasonable payout for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Offering adept legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on delivering dedicated legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in defending persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer