FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Frankfort Square

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Frankfort Square and grappling with a products liability case, Carlson Bier is the optimal choice for dedicated, results-driven legal representation. Our proven track record demonstrates our relentless pursuit of justice for victims affected by defective or unsafe products. Our profound understanding of Illinois-specific laws ensures that we tackle your claim with utmost precision and expertise. As an experienced personal injury law firm, we specialize in presenting solid arguments and compiling irrefutable evidence to maximize compensation. We deeply understand how hazardous product can take a toll on your health, finances, and everyday life; thus making it our mission to zealously advocate for you every step of the way. The team at Carlson Bier diligently handles each Products Liability case with unwavering integrity and professionalism while interweaving compassion towards each client’s unique situation – because your peace-of-mind matters significantly to us as much as setting things right legally does.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Frankfort Square Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand how devastating personal injury situations are. When you’re dealing with the aftermath of an accident or injury caused by a faulty product, it can be overwhelming. Our primary focus is to stand beside you during these challenging times as passionate and committed advocates for your rights.

One crucial area that we specialize in is Products Liability; this pertains to instances where a consumer product fails due to defective design, manufacturing errors, or inadequate warnings causing harm to the user. It is possible for products ranging from household items to industrial equipment, children’s toys, medical devices and even food products to cause varying degrees of damage or danger.

Products Liability cases involve several key issues:

• Determining which party bears responsibility: The manufacturer might directly be at fault if there was negligence in the production process. However, often other parties such as suppliers or distributors could also share liability.

• Proving the defect: It’s critical to show that the product was defective when it left the defendant’s hands and not due to misuse by the customer.

• Establishing causation: Not only must you prove that a particular product was defective but also how this defect led directly to your injuries.

When representing our clients in such complex scenarios, we harness an effective approach built on meticulous preparation and robust representation. Our legal team thoroughly investigates each case drawing upon expert witnesses who help establish fact-based evidence.

Injury claims involving defective products are intricately tangled with interlocks across different jurisdictions and state laws; hence having equipped attorneys like us significantly improves your chances of obtaining appropriate compensation. At Carlson Bier, we strive for comprehensive yet swift resolutions trying diligently not just for compensatory damages (like medical expenses) but also punitive damages aimed at deterring future negligence from defendants.

We want our prospective clients to be fully informed about their rights following any personal injury incident due to a faulty product—knowledge is instrumental in ensuring full justice proceeds unhindered by common pitfalls. We are committed to providing detailed and effective support every step of the way from initial consultation to successful resolution.

Conclusively, whether products have caused minor injuries or tragically life-altering consequences like permanent disability or even death, you shouldn’t stand alone against major manufacturers with intimidating resources at their disposal. Your fight is our fight and we vow to diligently champion your cause in our pursuit of justice.

We encourage you not just to equip yourself with knowledge but also explore tangible action options towards seeking rightful compensation for any harm suffered due to defective products. Curious about how much your case may be worth? Don’t let anxiety or guesswork cloud essential advance planning in your personal injury journey; instead, harness professional insights solidly grounded in extensive experience and legal acumen. All you need do is click on the button below, and move closer towards understanding just what your claim could potentially translate into in terms of financial relief and a sense of vindicated justice.

Remember: at Carlson Bier, servicing various locations across Illinois (but not implying physical presence in Frankfort Square), we stand ready as advocates determinedly fighting for your rights within product liability litigation landscape. Let us walk this path together because when it comes to championing justice for personal injury victims impacted by defective products, no one should have to face these challenges alone.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Frankfort Square Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Frankfort Square

Areas of Practice in Frankfort Square

Bike Crashes

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Offering expert legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal assistance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents gain fair remuneration for harms and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Accident

Extending adept legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for losses.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Committed to ensuring expert legal support for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Specializing in assisting patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440