FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hamel

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to navigating the complex waters of spinal cord injuries, trust in the expertise and experience of Carlson Bier. As recognized personal injury lawyers in Illinois, we have a remarkable record of securing favorable outcomes for clients facing life-altering spinal cord injuries. Our robust advocacy and command over legal intricacies ensure that our clients’ interests are always safeguarded as we work diligently to secure appropriate compensations that reflect their pain, suffering, medical expenses and lost income.

Spinal cord injuries require specialized knowledge due to extensive implications on quality of life. That’s why choosing Carlson Bier ensures meticulous handling with complete understanding of repercussions associated with such devastating incidents. Our seasoned attorney team is committed to offer you personalized attention vital for achieving optimal case results.

At Carlson Bier, compassionate representation meets profound excellence; thereby translating each case into a mission — securing justice for those rendered voiceless by unfortunate circumstances surrounding spinal cord injuries. We’re justifiably proud as luminaries in this field within Illinois legal circles—an unequivocal testament of our commitment towards obtaining unparalleled results for those relying upon us during challenging times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hamel Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we represent individuals who have suffered due to the negligence of others. We specialize in cases involving spinal cord injuries, which are among some of the most serious and complex injury types in personal injury law. This type of devastating injury can lead to a life filled with complications and uncertain recovery paths for victims. Our team is dedicated not only to understanding this complexity but also in ensuring our clients receive the highest standard of legal representation.

Spinal cord injuries occur primarily resulting from an abrupt blow or jolt to the spine that fractures, compresses, or dislocates vertebrae. The severity depends on both the location and extent of damage along your spinal cord. The ensuing permanent changes impact strength, sensation and various bodily functions underneath the trauma site.

Key issues associated with spinal cord injuries include:

– Partial or full paralysis leading to loss of movement

– Loss of sensation including temperature, touch and pressure sensitivity

– Exaggerated reflex actions or spasms

– Pain caused by injury itself or nerve damage

– Bowel control issues and bladder functionality difficulties

As renowned professionals specializing in personal Injury law based out of Illinois, at Carlson Bier we understand how these severe injuries significantly disrupt normal living conditions. They may result in crippling medical bills due to extensive treatments like surgeries, medications, ongoing therapy sessions as well as durable equipment needs like wheelchairs or home modifications dominantly shouldered by you.

We believe knowledge empowers you towards better decisions throughout navigation within legal process corridors; therefore providing clear insights into rights possibly affected from such circumstances is something we do enthusiastically. Some commonly overlooked rights involve accessibilities rendered nullified owing to sustained injuries -namely housing alterations crucially necessary post-injury phase contributing greatly towards forward-moving healing processes.

Our focus remains fixed on assisting you navigate through varied challenges in your pursuit for justice after suffering any kind of personal injury especially those centered drastically altering entire lifestyles such as Spinal Cord injuries. We provide client-centered services, tailoring our approach to meet the unique circumstances and needs of those involved.

Each case presents different requirements when it comes to evidence collection or fact-finding procedures. You will need an attorney who has handled spinal cord injury cases previously, understands the scientific complexities surrounding these injuries, and knows how to present this information persuasively in court. Moreover, it is vital to have strong negotiations skills for procuring out-of-court settlements on behalf of clients which we proudly excel in.

At Carlson Bier, we meticulously build each case ensuring it’s armed with solid evidence and robust legal strategy daringly confronting opposing parties. We aim for maximum compensation that adequately addresses losses incurred like medical expenses past and future earnings missed due to injury alongside other non-economic damages including pain or suffering.

Every victim deserves a fair chance at justice; equally they also deserve attorneys willing enough to aggressively fight for their cause. At Carlson Bier, every potential case undertaken gets backed assuredly by years of experience combined with raw dedication personifying our unwavering belief: Our clients matter most!

To take the first step towards securing justice after a life-altering spinal cord injury caused by someone else’s recklessness or negligence – get started now! Click on the button below so together we can explore your claim’s true worth during free initial consultation entrusted under our guidance at Carlson Bier – paving your path towards rightful restitution one dedicated legal step at a time.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hamel Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hamel

Areas of Practice in Hamel

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Supplying specialist legal support for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering expert legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Aged Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Fall Mishaps

Professional in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain fair compensation for wounds and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Crash

Extending expert legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Injuries

Specializing in ensuring professional legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and adept legal services to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in defending persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440