Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hawthorn Woods

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury is life-altering. Precisely when you need focused attention, Carlson Bier provides unparalleled legal guidance and support. We are an established personal injury law firm with expertise in handling complex spinal cord injuries cases. Why does this matter to Hawthorn Woods residents? From understanding the intricate medical implications of your injury to negotiating fiercely on your behalf—our team goes above and beyond as we represent victims with determination and compassion.

Our knowledge extends across extensive case studies, current laws, insurance company tactics, various types of treatment—enabling us to present robust litigated cases that favor our clients’ interests solely while providing comfort during hardships.

Trust Carlson Bier for their vast experience representing spinal cord injuries—a testimony that could mean a world of difference for your rightful compensation journey ahead. Our seasoned attorney group guarantees meticulous care throughout your case’s progression; hence you are not just another number here at Carlson Bier—you’re family. Best consider us for comprehensive coverage within our practice areas offering services that reach out far beyond where others do not venture—an unrivaled choice indeed.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hawthorn Woods Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are recognized and rewarded for our expertise in the field of personal injury law. Our profound understanding extends to dealing with the nuanced complexities of spinal cord injuries (SCIs). These injuries can lead to severe and lasting impacts such as paralysis or loss of sensory function, causing immeasurable pain and suffering.

Spinal cord injuries often result from incidents involving vehicular accidents, falls, sport-related injuries, or even acts of violence. When these unfortunate events happen due to another person’s negligence or intentional act, victims have a legal right to seek compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.

Our firm comprehends the extensive consequences SCI victims battle daily. Firstly, they encounter life-altering physical changes that affect their mobility and independence. Secondly, the financial burden tied to medical bills can be equally overwhelming. It is usual for patients with SCIs to require surgeries, rehabilitation therapy sessions, medication regimes or adaptive equipment which all add up quite rapidly.

In order to best comprehend what you stand against generally following such an incident:

• You may face several significant expenses related directly or indirectly towards managing your condition.

• Legally establishing liability might be complex but it’s crucial.

• Documenting your case accurately is essential in proving damages.

• Time limits apply on when you can file a claim- there are strict statutory deadlines known as statutes of limitations.

Carlson Bier relentlessly works towards helping individuals navigate this challenging process. We provide exceptional representation designed focusedly around each client’s unique needs and circumstances.

We manage everything: starting from gathering evidence; dealing with insurance companies who routinely employ strategies designed at reducing payout amounts; through guidance navigating intricacies surrounding recovery claims from parties liable alike negligent drivers or employers failing at maintaining safe workspace environments.Myriad factors come into play while calculating how much your SCI claim might prove worth – nature/ severity concerning the injury; corresponding costs regarding necessary medical interventions; loss linked with income/earning capacity; levels regarding pain/suffering endured to list a few.

However, each case varies vastly. At Carlson Bier, we possess the necessary legal expertise to present comprehensive strategies coupled with robust negotiation techniques ensuring maximum compensation on behalf of our clients.

While based in Illinois, we have earned a sterling statewide reputation for delivering top-notch personal injury legal services. Our tireless commitment towards doing everything it takes while seeking justice has brought innumerable SCI victims much-needed relief during some of their most challenging times.

• Expertise: We possess a wealth of knowledge and experience handling various facets of personal injury law; we focus particularly on spinal cord injuries.

• Compassion: The journey ahead might be fraught with challenges -we understand the emotional toll that SCIs bring along. Hence, our team is here not just as your legal counsel but also to provide support throughout this difficult phase.

• Aggression: When insurers refuse fair agreements or if parties accountable deny negligent actions –we fight aggressively until attaining justified outcomes.

• Commitment: Regardless whether through settlings claims outside courtrooms or via trial verdicts – once associated with us, you gain from our steadfastness towards helping achieve the best possible result aligned especially around your cause.

We encourage you to explore your legal options following an SCI sustained due to someone else’s negligence. Don’t let misconceptions concerning costs associated with retaining competent attorneys deter you from pursuing what rightfully belongs to you. Initial consultations with Carlson Bier are free, plus there wouldn’t be any fees unless we win!

If you’ve suffered a spinal cord injury and need expert help navigating its ramifications, look no further than Carlson Bier. Click below to find out how much your case could potentially be worth. Allow us to take charge thus empowering you focusing wholly upon recovery while we work unto obtaining deserved compensatory damages on your behalf.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hawthorn Woods Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hawthorn Woods

Areas of Practice in Hawthorn Woods

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying skilled legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Slip Incidents

Expert in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents obtain just payout for hurts and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Truck Accident

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for harms.

Worksite Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Damages

Expert in delivering compassionate legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and experienced legal support to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer