FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Hennepin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a motorcycle accident in Hennepin, securing the best legal representation should be a priority. Carlson Bier, renowned for their robust litigation and negotiation skills, stands as your trusted partner. Their exemplary team approaches each case with unparalleled determination to ensure maximum compensation for loss or injury resulting from all motorcycle mishaps. No stone is left unturned by Carlson Bier when constructing solid cases that reflect the complexities of every individual circumstance. It’s their dedication and meticulous attention to detail that sets them apart – an assurance of comprehensive legal care tailored specifically towards addressing personal injuries associated with motorcycle accidents around Hennepin area; count on them to relentlessly advocate for your rights both in court and mediation proceedings ensuring you secure deserved justice swiftly and accurately. So if finding outstanding attorney assistance after a motorbike catastrophe weighs heavy on your mind – remember it cannot get any better than Carlson Bier – where unmatched expertise meets ardent professionalism.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Hennepin Illinois

Located in the vibrant heart of Illinois, Carlson Bier exists to advocate for individuals who’ve been inflicted with personal injuries. With a keen spotlight on motorcycle accidents, our dynamic team of seasoned attorneys are dedicated to ensuring victims secure the compensation they truly deserve.

Motorcycle accidents can often result in significant financial burdens due to exorbitant medical bills and lost wages. Couple this with the potential emotional trauma from lingering physical impairments – it’s clear that the innocent party deserves justice. When this occurs, know that our legal experts at Carlson Bier are simply a phone call away.

Key issues we help address include:

• Determining liability: An integral aspect in any motorcycle accident claim is discerning who was responsible for causing the accident.

• Assessing damages: We work tirelessly to ascertain an accurate estimation of all losses incurred – including medical costs, mental distress, physical therapy costs, and loss of income due to missed workdays.

• Negotiating settlements: In most scenarios, insurance companies tend to undervalue your claim — however, rest assured knowing that we will aggressively fight for a settlement deserving of your pain and suffering.

On the roadways where danger can sometimes strike without warning – motorcyclists have rights too. Here at Carlson Bier, understanding those rights isn’t just part of our job; it’s essentially woven into our reputation as champions for motorists plying Illinois roads.

Offering unrivalled experience coupled with rigorous industry knowledge separates us as a leading law firm within personal injury litigation circles. Our wealth of expertise allows us to dissect intricate state laws governing motorcycle accidents effectively whilst constructing robust defense strategies.

Illinois riders should be aware:

• Helmets aren’t mandated by state law but opting for one could significantly reduce severe head injuries involved during an accident.

• Lane-splitting—riding between two lanes—is illegal under Illinois jurisdiction.

Therefore, whether you’re sport-touring downtown or hitting dirt roads upstate—an accident can be a life-altering event, often possessing the potential to unjustly ruin one’s livelihood.

Time and time again, we recognize how insurance companies exploit complex legal jargon to undercompensate victims fraudulently. Such unscrupulous tactics shouldn’t go unanswered; it demands in-depth understanding of your case from a team that cares about you–enter Carlson Bier.

We believe no stone should be left unturned when assisting our clients through their strenuous journey towards recovery and compensation – providing holistic counsel on every aspect of Illinois traffic law that applies directly to your case scenario. Regardless of complexity, know that the eminent attorneys at Carlson Bier are committed to delivering much-needed legal clarity while navigating these tumultuous times post-accident.

Moreover,

• If you’re without motorcycle insurance— don’t worry. You’re still entitled to secure compensation against an insured-at-fault party.

• For passengers involved in motorcycle accidents– you too qualify for claims covering healthcare costs, lost wages amongst other financial hardships endured due this unfortunate mishap.

Ultimately, speaking with an experienced attorney like those at Carlson Bier ensures that all ambiguities relating to claim processing are addressed– yielding a higher propensity for maximal compensation retrieval while ensuring adherence to stringent state-specific regulations.

We wholeheartedly invite you now: leverage our substantial experience encapsulating countless successful cases just as yours–equipping us to aid effectively irrespective of accident nuances or varying claim complexities throughout Illinois state territory.

Trust us not merely as your dedicated legal advisors but recognize us equally as supportive allies through perhaps one of the most trying periods within your life thus far—a partner standing beside you relentlessly advocating for justice and equable reparation deservedly on your behalf—an opportunity presenting by simply clicking below determining exactly what monetary value pertaining explicitly toward YOUR unique case could imply.

Click the button below–NOW! It’s high time indeed asserting your rights with proven experts guiding each step along the way. Casting uncertainty aside and welcoming reinstated confidence within your situation through our professional care at Carlson Bier today. Because to us, you are not just a client – rather a respected individual who deserves justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hennepin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Hennepin

Areas of Practice in Hennepin

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending expert legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Hospital Negligence

Ensuring expert legal representation for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering expert legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Stumble Injuries

Specialist in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Crashes: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents get fair settlement for injuries and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Accident

Offering experienced legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Specializing in supporting victims with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440