FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Hurst

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to seeking justice in the realm of Products Liability, Carlson Bier’s team stands as a premier legal choice. Proudly serving individuals statewide including Hurst, our firm specialties encompass all aspects of product liability law. Our seasoned team brings an arsenal of strategic solutions and extensive litigation experience to your corner – deftly navigating complexities born from defective or unsafe products that result in consumer injuries. With proven success records, our attorneys at Carlson Bier dedicate their efforts towards ensuring honesty and dedication. At every engagement level, they exert utmost diligence while pursuing rightful compensation for client damages suffered due to faulty merchandise; honestly protecting victim rights – it’s not just profession but passion at Carlson Bier! Enhance your chances for victory by making a smart choice today; let the experienced attorneys fortify your fight against injustice caused by neglectful manufacturers or retailers. Choose strength — Choose integrity – Explore more about what makes us different: Lean on the experts at Carlson Bier where you are not only ensured proper representation, but also find respect and transparency throughout each step!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Hurst Illinois

Carlson Bier Associates, the leading personal injury attorney group located in Illinois, specializes in championing the rights of those hurt by defective products. Undeniably, modern life is impossible without products manufactured on a large scale but sometimes these products pose unforeseen dangers to consumers due to defects or lack of proper usage instructions. These deficits can lead to serious physical harm or even loss of life where product liability represents the legal efforts to make manufacturers take responsibility for injuries caused by their defective goods.

As an integral part of our dedicated service orientation, we aim to provide educational content regarding product liability law that will empower our clients and strengthen the groundwork for their claims. Thus it’s crucial to highlight some key aspects:

• Products Liability is not limited just to faulty manufacturing but includes inadequate warnings about possible hazards along with errors in product design that endanger consumers.

• Manufacturers who are negligent and leave hazards unaddressed could be legally held responsible for any harm that comes from using their product.

• A successful claim does not only require your capability to prove that you have been injured due to a product but also needs confirmation that the manufacturer failed in his duty towards society.

• Product Liability does not entail proving how negligent a manufacturer was – If a user is harmed because there is another safer alternative design which could’ve prevented the injury then compensation may be claimed.

We at Carlson Bier Associates fully comprehend this highly nuanced area under personal injury law with all its complexities; making sure every client claims what they duly deserve. Knowledge coupled with experience fuels our approach towards handling these cases as we strive hard towards assisting you through every hurdle; regardless it being in regards to medical terminology comprehension, insurance claims, navigating legal proceedings or even negotiating settlements till successful conclusion of your case.

Now imagine; if you’re hospitalized after having consumed bottled water tainted by bacteria and subsequently start receiving piles of expensive bills while simultaneously contending with lost wages – It’ll feel like being victimized twice over. This is exactly where we step in to act as your line of defense while assiduously securing the substantial compensation you warrant for things like medical expenses, pain and suffering through emotional distress, lost wages – dealing efficaciously with all legal aspects so you can focus on healing.

Being trustworthy advocates managing this aspect of tort law, whether it be related to automobiles, household appliances or even processed foods; our team at Carlson Bier Associates helps ensure negligent manufacturers cannot shirk their responsibilities. Each case being unique deserves effective strategies tailored accordingly; keeping everyone apprised of viable options throughout the process.

Remember: If a product injures you due to being defective or not carrying adequate safety warnings; evidence may need preservation related directly to that product along with immediate consultation from an experienced attorney for advice about one’s legal rights. Believe in us as we work towards litigating successful claims making companies acknowledge negligence consequently operating safer business practices benefitting society as a whole.

Have you fallen victim to harmful goods inaccurate usage instructions? Are you jeopardized by the unconcerned demeanor of large industries putting profits before people’s safety? Then press the button below right now – let’s assess together and estimate what your claim might actually be worth. Because no one understands better than Carlson Bier Associates, how much it matters ensuring justice prevails when you’ve been wronged by products meant for enhancing life instead posing dangers resulting in undue hardships.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hurst Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Hurst

Areas of Practice in Hurst

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Offering professional legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal representation for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, providing specialist legal guidance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Slip Injuries

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Committed to aiding victims of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for wounds and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Providing adept legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal representation for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440