FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Itasca

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a products liability dispute in Itasca, Carlson Bier stands as your formidable advocate. Having built a reputable footprint across Illinois, our firm specializes in personal injury law, with an emphasis on products liability cases. Driven by a deep commitment to justice and the preservation of rights, we tackle each case with astute legal insight and unwavering dedication. At Carlson Bier, we understand how consequential defective or dangerous products can be to users; not just physically but financially too. Hence it’s integral when seeking the appropriate redress that you employ competent legal guidance from seasoned attorneys who deliver impressive results consistently – qualities inherent in our practice at Carlson Bier. We equip ourselves meticulously for every potential battle: analyzing defective product records comprehensively; connecting clients with medical experts’ opinions where needed and fiercely representing victims’ rights through negotiation or litigation if necessary. Trusting your claim to us is aligning yourself with quality representation committed exclusively towards achieving maximum compensation for victims of product liabilities.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Itasca Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated personal injury law group offering our expert attention and services to victims of product liability in Illinois. We engage from a place of deep understanding for what victims go through following an accident stemming from defective or dangerous products. Grounded upon years of experience, practical know-how, and actionable insights, we bring immense value to those grappling with the legal complexities and stress related to product liability claims.

Understanding Products Liability broadly refers to the responsibility borne by manufacturers or distributors for injuries caused as a result of their faulty products. Anything under the sun can become a source of potential hazard – right from everyday consumables like food items or cleaning agents, life-saving medical devices and drugs, children’s toys, household appliances, cars and automotive parts among numerous others. When these goods turn detrimental causing harm due to manufacturing defects, design flaws or deficient warnings; they open up a case for Product Liability.

Now let’s outline some key takeaways concerning Product Liability laws:

• The manufacturer is not always at fault: It could be any party within the product’s supply chain including wholesalers, retailers or any third parties involved.

• You don’t have to buy the product: Even if you did not purchase it but got injured using someone else’s defective item; you still hold rights over compensation.

• Proof is crucial: Proving that your injury was indeed due to usage of the defective product holds high significance in such cases.

As your trusted personal injury attorney group based in Illinois – Carlson Bier brings precision-attuned assistance steering you towards fair compensation while raising awareness about justice served against unsafe products and practices. We concertedly handle every stage including evidence collection & risk evaluation,the filing process,negotiations,and lawsuits if necessary while ensuring minimal interruptions in your recovery journey.

Why Choose Carlson Bier? Our highly skilled professionals carry an orderly blend of knowledge across Illinois statutory laws related to Products Liability,a good standing track record winning favorable settlements along with compassion that runs through our firm’s service ethos. Let’s take a quick snapshot into our work approach:

• Strong Expert Case Analysis: We start by going over your case details thoroughly which enables us to provide you with a rich understanding and insight into your legal situation.

• Clear Communication: We maintain open channels of interaction, discussing each step of the claim process so that you remain informed and partake in crucial decisions regarding your case.

• Personalized Client Service: Each client receives individualized attention designed around their specific needs aligning towards best possible outcomes.

Partner with us for our distinct blend of skill sets -a meticulous eye for detail, inherent passion coupled with aggressive defensive strategies dedicated to asserting your rights following a product liability incident. Our goal is not merely to work FOR you; rather we aim to partner WITH you treading across this challenging ride together.

Taking complex legal matters head-on doesn’t have to be overwhelming any longer. Turn towards Carlson Bier while allowing our proficient team to manage all aspects surrounding your Product Liability claims granting you peace of mind and freedom to focus on recovering from the distress caused due inmate.

Invested in learning how much your case could potentially translate into? This majority influenced by factors such as nature, severity extent injuries,magnitude incurred losses or even tactical strategic moves can only be gauged through personalized consultation. So why wait? Simply click on the button below giving yourself those necessary first steps towards justice served – because at Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorney Group, YOUR fight becomes OUR mission too!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Itasca Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Itasca

Areas of Practice in Itasca

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Supplying skilled legal advice for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering professional legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Birth Damages

Offering legal aid for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to helping patients of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring adept legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for injuries.

Construction Site Crashes

Committed to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Head Harms

Committed to extending dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to supporting clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440