Construction Site Accident Attorney in Kildeer

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Managing the aftermath of a Construction Site Accident can be overwhelming. Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm in Illinois, emerges as your ideal ally during this daunting process. Specializing in construction site accidents, we comprehend the nuances involved and implementing strategies towards obtaining fair restitution for our clients’ physical and emotional trauma. With a track record of delivering successful results to numerous victims throughout Kildeer’s vicinity, our attorneys flaunt their depth of knowledge in Illinois laws and regulations surrounding such accidents meticulously. Trusting us means enlisting the support of relentless advocates who will fight vehemently for your rights – leveraging expertise loaded with comprehensive investigation skills, precision-driven case-building approaches, and persuasive negotiation strength to secure optimal settlements or jury verdicts on behalf of you! Whether facing workplace injuries inside complex machinery or dealing with third-party negligence on scaffolding mishaps – rest easy knowing that choosing Carlson Bier is entrusting competent hands to convert chaos into control while cherishing seamless legal experience against all odds.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Kildeer Illinois

At the esteemed Illinois-based law firm Carlson Bier, we are profoundly dedicated to serving as advocates for individuals who have suffered personal injuries in construction site accidents. As specialists in this area of the law, our primary objective is to relentlessly pursue justice on behalf of our clients. Construction site accidents can lead to severe and sometimes fatal injuries due to the dangerous nature of the work involved. The sheer complexity and multi-faceted dynamic of these cases often require a deep understanding of both law and engineering.

Knowing your rights is paramount if you or someone you know has been injured on a construction site. In general, workers’ compensation may provide for medical care costs, recovery expenses, permanent disability benefits amongst others; but it mostly falls short when considering other unaccounted suffering such as pain and extended loss livelihood capacity. It’s crucially essential to understand that other parties like contractors or equipment manufacturers could be partly accountable for an accident on a construction site. Such scenarios potentially give way to third-party claims that could justify further financial restitution beyond what workers’ compensation provides.

While highlighting some commonly encountered causes of casualties at a construction site:

– Falls from high elevations – These include falls from roofs, ladders, scaffolding and nearly any surface elevated above ground level.

– Vehicle Accidents – Heavy machinery or vehicles like cranes, dump trucks used in construction work pose substantial threat if mishandled.

– Falling Objects – Construction zones frequently display risks due to tools or materials falling from high platforms.

Any person who would fall victim under such circumstances shall fully comprehend their rightful entitlements under Illinois laws which as we have noted can reach far beyond simple worker’s compensation.

When choosing Carlson Bier as your legal representation amid turmoil of coping with personal injury due to workplace accident provides inherent advantages. Our diligent team invests significant energy into investigating each case meticulously which contributes towards building robust arguments in favor of clients when negotiating settlements out of court or pleading before juries. The conscientiously compiled evidence, professional strategies and perseverance bring forth unrivaled legal representation that constantly aims for maximum compensation attainable to our clients.

Our attorneys at Carlson Bier are highly efficient with significant experience in handling catastrophic construction accident cases. We leverage our collective expertise, profound knowledge of the law, and relentless commitment to justice to fight effectively on behalf of our clients who have been victimized by construction site accidents. It’s important to remember that owing precisely towards complexities surrounding common workplace injuries – you might be undervaluing your claim if navigating through this process independently or without experienced legal advisors.

If you’ve suffered a personal injury due to a construction site accident in Illinois, contact Carlson Bier today rather than dealing with insurances alone and potentially accepting lesser compensation all-the-while struggling through recovery phases from such horrific accidents. We are here empathizing persistently while efficiently advocating for rights of our deserving clients.

Ultimately, as victims of Construction Site Accidents deal not only with physical pain but also an emotional toll along with financial stress; it’s essential for one to understand what their case is worth truly. Here at Carlson Bier, we’re fully committed to providing sound advice & individual detailed attention required seeking full deserved reparations which accordingly would contribute positively and considerably towards healing journey post-accident traumas.

Now is the time! Unlock your opportunity today by clicking on the button below – pioneering step toward understanding what your case could genuinely encompass monetarily under competent guidance letting us represent righteously serving you justice not simply as statement but practiced reality against unfair adversities occurring within workplaces across the proud state of Illinois.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Kildeer Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Kildeer

Areas of Practice in Kildeer

Bicycle Collisions

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering skilled legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, extending specialist legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Tumble Accidents

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Accidents

Collisions: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents receive equitable settlement for injuries and destruction.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending experienced legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Construction Crashes

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in providing expert legal support for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer