FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Lake in the Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When considering legal counsel for a products liability case in Lake in the Hills, trust your needs to the seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier. As experts in personal injury law throughout Illinois, we understand the intricacies of products liability cases and consistently strive to protect consumer rights. Our team has proven expertise in dealing with manufacturers or suppliers who failed their duty of care toward customers through defective or dangerous goods. Opting for Carlson Bier means choosing a law firm renowned for meticulous research, strategic planning and relentless pursuit of justice on behalf of our clients. We boast a strong track record demonstrating resounding success across numerous products liability judgments and settlements. Even though confronting corporate negligence can be challenging, you can count on us as strong advocates dedicated to ensuring accountability within industry practices while seeking fair compensation for damages sustained due to faulty goods or services . When product safety is breached resulting public risk rather than welfare, rely on excellence- The choice is clear: contact Carlson Bier today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Lake in the Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re committed to helping individuals navigate the complex realm of Products Liability. As an acclaimed personal injury attorney group, based in Illinois, we possess significant knowledge and expertise within this intricate field of law. We strive to educate our clients to empower them with a detailed understanding of what Product Liability means. Our team is dedicated to ensuring your rights are fully protected.

Product Liability refers to a manufacturer or seller being held liable for placing a defective product into hands of a consumer. This area encompasses various types of products – it could be anything from faulty car parts that caused an accident, defective machinery at your workplace leading to injuries, or even unsafe medicines resulting in adverse health effects.

• It’s essential to understand that manufacturers might be held accountable for their negligence if they failed their duty by not sufficiently warning about potential risks or dangers related to their product.

• Sellers also bear responsibility as they have a duty not only to sell quality products but also provide all necessary safety information.

• As consumers, you hold specific rights according to Illinois Product Liability laws that must not go overlooked.

Understanding the legal process can feel daunting without professional guidance. That’s where Carlson Bier comes in – presenting the crucial complexities of Product liability cases in simplified terms:

1) Establishing liability: The most vital part of any Product Liability case begins with establishing responsibility; who exactly should answer for the damage caused by the flawed products?

2) Determining damages: Next step involves assessing what kind and extent of harm has been suffered due which includes physical injuries and financial losses alike.

3) Presenting compelling evidence: As expert litigators, we strive towards gathering precise proof supporting your claim including medical reports, accident site photographs and witness testimony among others.

4) Advocating relentlessly on your behalf: At Carlson Bier we fight tirelessly so that justice triumphs assuring you receive rightful compensation for all suffering endured.

Time is indeed essence when dealing with Product liability claims in Illinois, where a two-year statute of limitations exists. The clock generally starts ticking from the moment injury is discovered linked to defective product. Hence it becomes crucial to act early ensuring you don’t lose out on your right to claim.

At Carlson Bier, your education and protection are our priorities because we know how critical this knowledge could prove for asserting your rights. Whether you’ve been injured by faulty goods or lost someone dear due to dangerous products, our seasoned personal injury attorneys will stand firmly by your side during these challenging times offering legal counsel that is clear, comprehensive and dependable.

As renowned defenders of individual rights in Illinois, we’re just a phone call away – ready to answer ALL queries related to Product Liability law. So why wait? Click on the button below now! Discover what Carlson Bier can offer and find out how much value your case holds today itself. Let us advocate for you and champion your cause creating viable legal strategies while providing emotional support as well – let’s ensure those responsible are held accountable together. Choose success…Choose Carlson Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake in the Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Lake in the Hills

Areas of Practice in Lake in the Hills

Bike Crashes

Specializing in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending specialist legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Clinical Incompetence

Extending experienced legal assistance for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Slip Incidents

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Accidents: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for hurts and damages.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Trucking Accident

Extending experienced legal support for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to offering compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Expert in representing victims with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440