FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Lena

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Trust the expertise of Carlson Bier for reliable and cutting-edge support in products liability claims. With impeccable acuity, we at Carlson Bier handle a diverse range of issues to ensure that consumers don’t bear undue responsibility when using defective or dangerous products. Our legal team possesses profound knowledge concerning Illinois product liability laws, and is committed to helping Lena residents vindicate their rights. We stand out as superior advisors, renowned for thorough review processes which reflect on our longstanding record in achieving favorable settlements and verdicts. Driven by an innate understanding of how significantly these incidents can impact your life , we offer assertive representation bolstered by personalized attention because you are more than just a client – you are family. Choose Carlson Bier as your protective shield against reckless corporations who forfeit public safety for increased profit margins; choose us because every individual deserves justice served with diligence and passion irrespective of their geographical location.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Lena Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of experienced personal injury attorneys centrally located in Illinois. Employing an uncompromising approach towards safeguarding our clients’ rights, we bring unparalleled results when dealing with various types of product liability cases. Products liability refers to the legal obligation imposed on manufacturers, distributors and sellers for any harm caused by defective or dangerous products. This area of law exists to protect consumers from potentially harmful products while ensuring that manufacturers uphold certain standards.

Products Liability is broadly classified into three main categories: Manufacturing defects, Design Defects, and failure to provide adequate warnings/instructions about the product’s use. Each category carries its distinct nuances.

• Manufacturing Defects occur when errors happen during the course of a product’s assembly leading it to deviate from its intended design.

• Design Defects refer to inherent flaws within the whole line of a particular product rendering it unreasonably dangerous irrespective of it being correctly manufactured.

• Failure-to-warn involves cases wherein the absence of instructions or warnings makes a product inherently hazardous.

It’s important to understand individual rights under these classifications as well as navigate through intricate processes involved while filing such lawsuits. As skilled personal injury lawyers with specialization in Product Liability Law, at Carlson Bier we take pride in offering comprehensive guidance throughout this pursuit while fiercely advocating for your interests before courtrooms – relentlessly pursuing maximum compensation for your injuries.

Employing strategic tactics rooted in state-of-the-art technology and investigative resources available at our disposal; coupled with our robust understanding of complex legislature interplay between state and federal laws- our seasoned attorneys leave no stone unturned until justice has been served.

Whether you’re dealing with financial hardship due to hefty medical bills following an accident stemming from product malfunction/failure; or have lost wages due to inability to work post such incident- realize that these burdens need not be borne alone especially if they were thrust upon you because some manufacturer or seller decided to sideline safety standards.

Let’s not forget the physical pain, mental trauma and dramatic changes venues of life you may have been forced into – all irreversible damages that no sum of money can ever compensate for; but what a carefully planned lawsuit seeking rightful compensation under Product Liability laws can do is alleviate these added financial stresses and bring some level of justice – this premise underscores our motive at Carlson Bier.

Our inherent belief in maintaining complete transparency means we keep clients updated on every development related to their case- explaining legal terminologies/jargons in plain English ensuring they’re never intimidated or left confused by legal restraints.

By embracing an empathetic yet aggressive approach towards litigation, at Carlson Bier we stand committed to helping our clients claim rightful compensation and regain control over their lives post such challenging circumstances.

We understand dealing with such overwhelming situations singlehandedly might be intimidating. Let’s make it more approachable for you: Your initial consultation with us is free – where we’ll listen attentively to your experiences, address your concerns sincerely and offer preliminary guidance setting realistic expectations based on precedents.

Don’t let confusion turn into regret simply because you waited too long or refrained from taking necessary steps fearing complexities involved. Remember: Once liability has been proven under Illinois Law, compensatory damages are awarded which cover economic losses (like lost wages, medical expenses) as well as non-economic ones (such as pain & suffering).

Choose peace over pangs today! As a premier personal injury attorney group specializing in Products Liability law based out of Illinois, allow us, at Carlson Bier guide through these uncharted territories removing chances for unwarranted exploitation while focusing entirely on bringing justice back onto your side!

Allow us to put your mind at ease. Navigate below and tap the button provided to find out what your case could be worth today! Don’t delay the justice you deserve any longer!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lena Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Lena

Areas of Practice in Lena

Bike Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing skilled legal help for patients of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Extending experienced legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on aiding individuals of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for hurts and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring expert legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Construction Accidents

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Committed to ensuring professional legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unjust Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Damage

Specializing in defending individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440