FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Lincoln Square

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When construction site accidents occur in Lincoln Square, Carlson Bier is the proven choice for legal advocacy. With a distinguished reputation across Illinois, we specialize in personal injury law with a special focus on Construction Site Accidents. Our team of seasoned attorneys deftly maneuvers through complex legal proceedings to assure our clients receive maximum compensation for their pain and hardship. We understand how devastating these incidents can be – physically, emotionally, and financially – hence we commit our resources and expertise towards securing favorable outcomes. Holding negligent parties accountable while protecting your rights is written into the fabric of Carlson Bier’s ethos; our firm stands as an unwavering pillar of support during such distressing times. If you are looking for exceptional legal representation following a construction accident, look no further than Carlson Bier – specialist attorneys who work assiduously to deliver justice where it’s due without compromising service delivery or integrity.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Lincoln Square Illinois

As a leading law firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier takes immense pride in representing victims of severe personal injuries, especially in the realm of construction site accidents. With numerous intricacies and associated legal complexities entwined within these cases, our expertise can be invaluable to those who seek justice through proper legal channels.

Construction site accidents encompass a broad range of incidents that can all lead to serious injury or even death. This might include falling from heights such as scaffolds or roofs, getting hit by falling equipment or supplies, being caught between objects or machinery, electrocutions, and even exposure to hazardous materials. At Carlson Bier, we stand committed towards serving your best interests ensuring every angle is considered when presenting your case forward in the court of law.

• Injuries at construction sites often occur due lack of safety measures.

• Falling objects pose threat causing severe head injuries.

• Slip and fall hazards are sometimes overlooked resulting in grave bodily harm.

• Heavy machinery related mishaps form another primary cause for such accidents.

We hold expansive knowledge within the labyrinthine structure of personal injury law specific to construction site incidents. Each state holds its own particular set of laws regarding worker safety norms and employer standards. In Illinois specifically, there exist definitive regulations with respect to timely adherence maintenance checks for all heavy-duty equipment involved on-site.

Carlson Bier places great emphasis on walking you through these confusing aspects with clarity so that you’re well aware why we collate specific data points while fighting your case. We tirelessly work towards securing substantial compensation for damages including hospital expenses trauma therapy sessions lost wages due not being able work as result direct incapacitation following incident career progress loss general emotional suffering constant physical pain among others

Our experience has also allowed us understand how value claim varies depending situation seriousness injuries sustained financial needs victim other assorted elements needful presentation effective argument authoritative bodies on such matters Trust us provide you mistakes-free efficient representation

The professional team at Carlson Bier is composed of personal injury attorneys who possess deep familiarity with the methods used by insurance companies to potentially reduce your claim value. With this insight, we ensure that you receive the full extent of compensation entitled to you under Illinois law.

We deeply empathize with every individual who has fallen victim to a construction site accident in Illinois and hence strive strenuously to convert our legal prowess into your benefit. From understanding intricacies related workers’ compensation claims liaising various other parties involved seeking out expert testimonies specifically catered for strengthening pitch crucial settlements we do it all Carlson Bier

Now that you are thoroughly aware of our capabilities and steadfast commitment towards delivering professional yet compassionate service, we invite you take next step in securing justice recovery deserve Don’t let another moment pass by feeling overwhelmed stressed about how navigate through complex landscape personal injury lawsuit burdened begged a question “how much could case worth?” Click button below right now find from seasoned experts at Carlson Bier provided them all necessary details Our strategic approach might just end up being difference between receiving minimal compensations making sure these mishaps never recur future

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lincoln Square Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lincoln Square

Areas of Practice in Lincoln Square

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Giving expert legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing specialist legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Slip Injuries

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking restitution for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents get reasonable payout for damages and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Offering experienced legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for hurts.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Harms

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure restitution.

Backbone Impairment

Specializing in advocating for patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440