Construction Site Accident Attorney in Lindenhurst

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you, or a loved one, have been involved in a construction site accident in Lindenhurst, it’s imperative to act quickly and secure legal representation. Choosing Carlson Bier could be your best decision. We are accomplished personal injury lawyers with extensive records of successfully representing clients for their rights in Illinois. Our team has handled numerous construction site accident cases like yours, allowing us to develop insights into the complexities of these claims. We understand how tragic events can change lives unexpectedly and our goal is clear – to seek maximum compensation that fully reflects your pain suffering and financial losses.

We bring immense expertise on prominent Illinois laws governing workplace accidents and safety violations.

Our meticulous approach examines every possible angle; we will stop at no end to ensure each detail is accounted for during negotiations or trials.

While many law firms may pass on challenging cases, we strive where others don’t – it’s part of who we are at Carlson Bier.Don’t fight alone – let us stand by your side.

Remember: Your recovery starts when you decide to fight back with Carlson Bier taking charge!

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Lindenhurst Illinois

Presenting Carlson Bier – eminent personal injury attorneys in Illinois. We specialize in various areas of personal injury law with noteworthy expertise in cases involving Construction Site Accidents. Years of extensive practice has ingrained us with comprehensive knowledge about the challenging environment of construction sites, placing us at a distinctive edge to represent anyone implicated in an accident.

Construction site accidents can often lead to severe injuries and even fatality due to inherently high-risk activities and equipment involved. At Carlson Bier, we understand that every case is unique and requires a customized approach that caters to individual needs. From falls from elevated heights, scaffold collapse, ladder accidents, electrical incidents, or equipment malfunction—our team diligently handles each situation and fights vigorously for our client’s rights.

To further edify you on Construction Site Accidents:

• The provisionary coverage under workers’ compensation may not suffice the potential loss post-accident.

• Subcontractors or product manufacturers could also be partly liable besides your employer.

• Legal liability extends beyond physical injuries; it includes emotional trauma too.

• A proper evaluation by professionals can uncover facts that enhance your claim’s value.

Our process begins with providing active consultation where we discuss the specifics of your incident while maintaining absolute confidentiality—followed by vigorous fact-finding wherein expert investigation techniques are employed to unearth pivotal information. Once the groundwork is solidified, proactive negotiations complemented by masterful argumentation aids us remarkably well throughout courtroom litigation.

As daunting as legal matters might look like initially—an experienced attorney walking alongside you throughout immensely refines your outlook towards such endeavor. Let Carlson Bier shoulder your burdens and navigate you through intricate legalities. With time-honored strategies backed up by irrefutable professionalism—the desired recompense is within arm’s reach.

Diminished health following an accident imposes significant strain on financial resources owing to burgeoning medical expenses coupled with lost wages invoked due to incapability to work efficiently—with Carlson Bier representing you, rest assured of relentless commitment to procure the highest possible compensation entailing all incurred losses.

We urge you not to delay seeking legal counsel after an accident, as timely initiation better preserves evidence and judiciously enhances your chances at a successful claim. Remember that while insurance companies aim for cheap settlements—your trusted attorney has only one concern: optimum reparation justifying your sufferings.

Our expertise is well-documented in securing damages for deserving clients with resounding victories against sturdy opponents—an enduring testament to our formidable reputation among Illinois personal injury attorneys. We are truly invested in the success of every case we handle—a keen reflection not solely on our unyielding dedication towards our profession but moreover on compassionate concern towards fellow community members tainted by unfortunate incidents.

Beyond the call of duty, Carlson Bier takes pride in educating clients about their rights and demystifying convoluted law jargon into simple language comprehensible to anyone. Because informed clients deal adeptly with arising challenges, showing signs of fewer stresses—a fundamental belief we ardently practice.

At Carlson Bier, we operate under a strict ‘no win-no fee’ policy meaning if things do not swing favorably—you owe us nothing. Therefore, worry less about expenses and focus singularly on recuperation—the end goal remains triumphant justice ensuring relief from undue financial duress catalogued by unwarranted accidents.

Also important to note—as per Illinois state law guidelines—we sincerely express that our services extend across multiple areas within Illinois albeit without implying any physical presence outside locations officially listed under Carlson Bier’s address book.

Now it’s time for action – Wish to know what potential compensation lies ahead? It’s time then click below and find it out. Assess the potential worth of your case today because rightful recompense awaits those who rise against adversities—and while circumstances might seem highly challenging—remember that with adequate support—every battle can be won.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lindenhurst Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lindenhurst

Areas of Practice in Lindenhurst

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Giving specialist legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing experienced legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing skilled legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Stumble Incidents

Specialist in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their damages.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal support for families affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to helping clients of car accidents gain appropriate recompense for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Mishap

Offering specialist legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to providing professional legal advice for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to assisting persons with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer