Trucking Accident Attorney in Marshall

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re faced with the aftermath of a trucking accident in Marshall, Carlson Bier emerges as your prime advocate. Our specialization as personal injury lawyers gives us a comprehensive understanding of the nuances involved in truck accidents. Equipped with extensive legal knowledge and leveraging strategic expertise, we fight relentlessly for our clients’ rights to ensure they receive due compensation. We understand that each case carries unique circumstances and therefore offer highly personalized service built around each client’s needs. From effectively dealing with insurance negotiators to navigating complex documentation, Carlson Bier stands by you every step of the way. What sets us apart is our commitment to justice and uncompromised approach towards safeguarding your interests after such traumatic occurrences – exclusively offering expert advice on truck-related incidents. When you seek representation from Carlson Bier, rest assured that an experienced team has your back throughout this journey ensuring maximum benefit under Illinois law.

About Carlson Bier

Trucking Accident Lawyers in Marshall Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we fully comprehend the intense turmoil and stress individuals face following a trucking accident. Our experienced team of Illinois-based personal injury attorneys offers devoted representation for victims and families impacted by devastating truck accidents.

We consider it paramount to educate our clients about the intricate factors surrounding trucking accidents; these primarily include liability determination, industry regulations, types of accidents, common injuries sustained, and compensation possibilities. Understanding potential circumstances can greatly aid in building solid cases.

* Crucially, upon investigation into any trucking accident case, determining liability is indispensable. One must realize that several entities may share responsibility for an accident: the driver due to negligence or fatigue; the employer if found allowing insufficient rest breaks or using inexperienced drivers; manufacturers or vehicle maintainers in instances of faulty equipment or improper upkeep.

* Recognizing relevant industry-specific laws and regulations is also crucial. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) guidelines strictly regulate truck operations with stipulations on load limits, maintenance schedules, licensing requirements – non-compliance to such laws can lead to significant penalties.

Various types of collisions underscore different levels of impact severity:

1) Jackknife Accidents typically result when brakes bind up predominantly on either tractor or trailer while others remain free-moving causing dangerous skids.

2) Rollovers take place when trucks lose stability often due to speeding around corners/curves or overloading.

Frequent injuries caused by these profound incidents comprise traumatic brain injuries (TBI), spinal cord damage leading potentially to paralysis, broken bones rendering individuals unable to work for extended periods – all inflicting psychological traumas concurrently alongside momentous physical pain.

While understanding common injuries aids empathy towards victims; realizing possible compensations fosters hope during their recovery process.

• Medical Expense Compensation covering costs from emergency treatments through rehabilitation therapies further onto future medical needs related with the incident.

• Lost Wages Compensation accounting for earnings lost due absence from employment including potential loss of future earnings due to permanent disability.

• Pain and Suffering Compensation ascertains the intangible damage impacted on an individual’s life, affiliating value thereto.

Headquartered in Illinois, here at Carlson Bier we are dedicated to guard the rights of individuals marred by truck accidents – extending dedicated support for victims throughout their legal journey while advocating earnestly for rightful compensation. Delivering relentless representation is not a merely transactional job but rather is impassioned responsibility fueled strongly by empathy towards accident survivors.

We trust that our accompanying guidance will offer extensive insights into the comprehensive nature of trucking accident cases and provides beneficial advice to those affected. However, remember—every case carries distinct deliberations necessitating expert evaluation from experienced attorneys; diligent understanding of all possible implications sets the foundation for robust settlements or verdicts.

Therefore, it is essential to ascertain your entitled claim effectively—are you dealing with culpable third parties? Are you entitled to compensatory damages beyond medical expenses and economic loss? Interactions with insurers can be intimidating; hence professional counsel becomes indispensable in such crucial junctures ensuring rightful claims reach deserving hands timely without undue distress.

Despite remaining heavily informative in nature, this article serves just as a broad guide. Given expanse of personal injury law touching upon numerous unique claim scenarios it would be unwise presuming it substitutes for one-to-one professional advice tailored to your exclusive circumstances. For personalized assistance regarding your case details do engage consultation services rendered by seasoned professionals specialized within various spectrums affiliated under personal injury laws.

The next step? Your fight towards fair justice doesn’t have to feel like an uphill battle anymore—click on the button below now let our team help estimate realistically what could possibly be worth of your rightful claims!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marshall Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Trucking Accident FAQ​

Trucking accidents are often caused by a combination of factors, including driver fatigue, mechanical failures, improper loading of cargo, speeding, and inadequate driver training. External factors like poor road conditions and bad weather can also contribute.

Safety first: move to a safe area if possible. Call emergency services for medical and police assistance. Document the scene with photos and notes, and gather contact information from witnesses and all involved parties. It’s also crucial to seek medical attention, even if you feel fine, as some injuries may not be immediately apparent.

Liability in trucking accidents can be complex. It may involve the truck driver, the trucking company, manufacturers of truck parts, or other third parties. An investigation will typically look into the driver’s actions, vehicle maintenance records, the trucking company’s compliance with regulations, and other factors to determine fault.

Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to various forms of compensation, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. In some cases, punitive damages might be awarded, especially if gross negligence or intentional misconduct is involved.

Trucking accidents often involve complex legal and regulatory issues. An attorney with experience in this field can navigate federal and state trucking laws, deal with large trucking companies and their insurers, and help ensure that you receive fair compensation. They can also assist in gathering evidence and expert testimonies necessary for building a strong case.

All Attorney Services in Marshall

Areas of Practice in Marshall

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending specialist legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Negligence

Delivering expert legal representation for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Fall Mishaps

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Delivering legal help for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents get appropriate compensation for hurts and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Ensuring professional legal support for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Committed to delivering dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Wounds

Skilled in tackling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in supporting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer