Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Mendon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a motorcycle accident, you need superior legal representation to protect your rights. That’s where Carlson Bier excels as the vital source of experienced Motorcycle Accident attorneys offering aid to clients across Mendon. Our skills and determination set us apart due to our commendable record in resolving complex cases, we’re known for achieving fair compensation for our clients swiftly . At Carlson Bier, we understand each claim involves unique intricacies that call for strategic methods tailored specifically towards individual case demands. We aim to maintain unyielding advocacy by aggressively defending your interests against insurance companies or aggressive parties who may not respect your rightful claims. With mastery over prevailing laws around motorcycle accidents combined with an impressive court presence, Carlson Bier always assures client representation at its finest quality preserving trust while minimizing stress faced during this pressing phase of life.We take pride in our work as compassionate lawyers establishing strong attorney-client relationships yet fiercely negotiating settlements safeguarding 100% customer satisfaction which truly makes choosing Carlson Bierge rewarding decision after a traumatic motorcycle accident.

About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Mendon Illinois

Personal Injury Law Firm, Carlson Bier, is dedicated to providing proficient legal services to clients who have been victims of Motorcycle Accidents. As renowned personal injury lawyers in Illinois, we aim to ensure our clientele is educated about their rights and options when dealing with such claims. Understanding that the moments following an accident can be confusing and overwhelming, we extend our expertise for a comprehensive understanding of the scope of Motorcycle Accident laws.

Motorcycle Accidents are not uncommon on the roads of Illinois. In fact, they tend to happen more frequently than one can imagine giving rise to immense physical pain and financial loss for the victim involved. This kind of accident generally leads to two types of claims: Personal Injury Claims where one seeks compensation for bodily harm sustained; Property Damage Claims where one seeks reimbursement for damage inflicted on the motorcycle or any other property harmed during the incident.

As per Illinois law, three fundamental elements must be proven in order for a claimant to succeed in a personal injury lawsuit which includes: demonstrating that the defendant had a duty of care towards you; showcasing how they breached this duty causing your injury; presenting sufficient evidence that proves your accident-related injuries were indeed due by this breach. Necessarily proving these elements help solidify successful claim outcomes.

• Duty Of Care – Every motorist holds a legal obligation by law when operating a vehicle in public to act reasonably and avoid endangering others.

• Breach Of Duty – The claimant must prove that through action or negligence, another driver has breached said duty.

• Causation Of Injury – Evidence such as medical reports linking your injuries directly resulting from said breach becomes mandatory for vindication.

Being involved in a Motorcycle Accident entitles you as per law an appropriate compensation covering all medical expenses along with lost wages and intangible damages like mental suffering and degradation quality-of-life aspects too if proven conclusively.

Compiling substantial documentation regarding your accident stands crucial throughout this process—everything from police reports to medical evaluations and photographs of the accident scene. Additionally, acquiring testimonials from eyewitnesses bolsters credibility for insurance negotiations or courtroom proceedings.

One pivotal detail about personal injury lawsuits in Illinois is that this state operates under what’s termed as ‘Comparative Negligence’ rule—that implies you are entitled to pursue damage recovery even if partially responsible for the accident unless your negligence exceeds another party involved in causing it. This statute aids cushion financial burdens emanating from an unexpected misfortune like a motorcycle accident.

Engaging one-on-one with qualified legal professionals can enhance your understanding of rights pertaining to yourself since laws governing such liabilities vary across states. We at Carlson Bier commit ourselves to handle each case distinctly providing unwavering support throughout the tumultuous journey until claim attainment ensuring every possible compensation component is targeted leveraging our vast experience dealing with similar cases before.

Last but not least, remember that there exists a Statute of Limitations within which these lawsuits must be filed post-accident occurrence—typically two years for personal injuries and five years for property damages. It is hence utmost advised seeking counsel promptly after an unfortunate incident chances achieving a successful claim outcome significantly rather than risking potential eligibility loss due to ignorance or delay.

At Carlson Bier, we walk through each step meticulously examining intricate details constructing robust case strategy optimizing every client’s individual circumstance prospects leading towards favorable verdicts during court hearings or negotiating settlements minimizing undue stress faced by victims already undergoing immense physical trauma besides mental agony heightened during such distressful phases irrespective of complexity level the case might pose.

We hope this debris has offered invaluable insight into Motorcycle Accident claims encouraging readers realizing their own afforded protections underneath law framework-safeguarding citizens statewide who unfortunately find themselves trapped within grueling aftermath arisen from unpredictable roadway accidents. Passionately advocating victims’ rights has been Carlson Bier’s guiding principle throughout its illustrious law practice history rendering compassionate service unearthing desired legal remedies promising clientele peace-of-mind redemption.

But remember, each situation is individual with various factors at play. To assess your unique case’s worth, simply click the button below. Let us determine how Carlson Bier can help you recover righteously what belongs to you, ensuring justice isn’t merely served but triumphantly celebrated as well.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mendon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Mendon

Areas of Practice in Mendon

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering specialist legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering specialist legal services for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal help to clients affected by faulty goods.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Tumble Incidents

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Harms

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents receive fair remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending experienced legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Head Harms

Expert in providing compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Undeserved Fatality

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to supporting individuals with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer