Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mundelein

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier’s expert legal team is your trusted ally in Mundelein and throughout Illinois. With vast experience handling complex personal injury cases, including dog bites, we offer comprehensive support during this challenging time. Our seasoned lawyers understand the intricate nuances of Illinois state laws pertaining to animal attacks. From conducting an in-depth analysis of your case to representing you vigorously in court if necessary, our aim is always to secure maximum compensation for victims’ pain and suffering or any other related costs incurred due to such incidents. At Carlson Bier, our reputation has been built on offering empathy-led client service and delivering impressive results consistently on behalf of dog bite injury victims. Despite requiring no upfront fees until we win your case successfully; working tirelessly towards achieving justice remains our primary concern above all else. Choosing Carlson Bier as your legal representation for a Dog Bite Injury ensures an unwavering commitment dedicated entirely towards serving in your best interests.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mundelein Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a leading Illinois personal injury law firm dedicated to aiding victims of dog bite injuries. Unfortunately, the pain inflicted by a dog attack extends beyond just physical discomfort; it triggers emotional trauma and substantial medical expenses that can significantly disrupt your life. Our attorneys specialize in handling such sensitive cases with professionalism and compassion. We unyieldingly advocate for justice on behalf of our clients while aiming to ensure they obtain the maximum compensation entitled.

Dog bite injuries entail various complexities influenced predominantly by three chief factors: breed, size, and history of the involved canine. Specific breeds have federal statutes attached reflecting their inherent aggression levels or tendencies – an important element in determining liability within accidents. Also critical is the animal’s past misconduct record if existing, as well as its actual size – large dogs potentially causing extensive damage.

The aftermath of these incidents usually contains significant mental distress besides the conspicuous wounds or scarring. This often overlooked aspect deserves due consideration, especially during victim recovery phases since it directly impacts quality-of-life measures post-incident. You could face disfigurement from attacks leaving pronounced physical scars prompting employed reconstructive cosmetic techniques—a costly but sometimes essential process falling under potential claim aspects.

Bear in mind that Illinois operates under specific stipulations regarding dog bite lawsuits:

• Strict Liability: In contrast to states requiring evidence of the attacking dog’s ‘dangerous propensity’ previously known to its owner (‘one-bite rule’), here owners are held accountable regardless.

• Comparative Negligence: The plaintiff’s actions at incident time get reviewed—if contributing elements towards provoking the attack are detectable, compensation may potentially reduce based on assigned fault percentages.

• Statute of Limitations: Dog bites fall under general personal injury controlled by this two-year restrictive timeline for pursuing legal action—missed deadlines unfortunately lead to barred claims robust resistance even from most empathetic courts.

Our committed team adheres strictly conforming every advocacy attempt with these guidelines thus ensuring lawsuit navigations remain within acceptable legal boundaries while still aggressively advocating for deserving client settlements.

While we understand the trauma associated with dog bite injuries, one must act promptly to ensure a successful claim. Immediate medical treatment assures thorough professional documentation—useful during ensuing legal proceedings. Also advised is preserving any evidence that can lend credibility to your account of events—for example, clothing torn during the attack or photographs portraying injury severity and circumstance details. One other thing is animal control report filing informing local authorities hence initiating formal records serving as case testament tools later on.

Our proficient personal injury attorneys venture to alleviate much of this burden by diligently pursuing compensation encompassing all recovery aspects from lost wages, medical bills, emotional suffering to prospective aftercare costs—an omnidirectional approach encompassing both tangible finances and invaluable life quality parameters combined for complete empathy measures in every Carlson Bier client pursuit.

Let us not forget that you are the victim here; inflicted pain, damage endured was not your fault—we intend securing you fair restitution. This starts with understanding exactly what happened relative incident value hence dictating potential settlement amounts achievable within our pursuits putting victims back on track after such traumatic episodes.

So although acknowledging unfairness experienced through these incidents remains challenging, gaining justice becomes possible through leveraging competent advocacy like only lawyers from our law firm can provide—professional representation offering assistance tailored expressly towards restoring injured lives following dog bite incidents deeming us a leading Illinois voice rightful victims depend on regularly.

At Carlson Bier, we advocate tirelessly in demanding full recovery compensation because we genuinely care about bringing each case’s possible victory value into fruition helping heal affected lives facilitating brighter futures after unfortunate impacts involving aggressive canines. You need an ally who understands and appreciates intricacies tied to these painful circumstances – someone empathetically fighting along every step right beside you toward achieving liberation from oppressive cases thrust upon innocent world citizens without due consideration

Do remember! Dog attacks alter peoples’ lives forever—it isn’t just about scarring or injuries. It’s also psychological torment, medical expenses, and many more disruptions to regular life rendering the situation additionally unbearable. Your safety matters; your pain recognition matters—take control of the narrative by pursuing justice where due wrongly.

Click below if you’d like a personal assessment on case worth exact values your claim holds—our dedicated legal team awaits eager to assist victims fighting back against unjust harm suffered improving circumstances guiding them into better tomorrows.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mundelein Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mundelein

Areas of Practice in Mundelein

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending specialist legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Providing specialist legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal assistance to victims affected by defective items.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Slip Injuries

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Extending legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending adept legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cognitive Impairments

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Committed to assisting individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer