FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Mundelein

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Entrusting your products liability battle to Carlson Bier is a safeguard against injustice. Known for their relentless pursuit of justice, this proficient law firm delivers legal solutions in Illinois with a particular focus on Mundelein residents facing product-related harm. As experts in Products Liability Law, our attorneys are skilled at dissecting the complex nature of such cases that merges contract and tort laws, enabling you win compensatory damages. In the world of defective or unsafe products that injure consumers despite precautionary usage, Carlson Bier stands out as an ally – championing consumer rights confidently yet empathetically. With seasoned lawyers who comprehend the labyrinthine federal safety regulations and emerging state-level interpretations, we offer representation par excellence in courtrooms where personal injury claims due to faulty products are litigated fiercely. At Carlson Bier, every case is handled diligently with tailored strategies because we know it affects lives deeply; making us more than just defenders – we become advocates for change in product safety norms through our meticulous work within the confines of the law.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Mundelein Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are staunch advocates for the rights of those who have suffered personal injuries due to defective or dangerous products. As a leading Personal Injury Attorney group based in Illinois, we combine our extensive legal knowledge and years of courtroom experience to help individuals navigate Products Liability claims with utmost confidence.

Products Liability is a complex area of law that encompasses situations where manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, or sellers are held responsible due to an injury caused by their products. This injury could be because they were flawlessly used but still ended up harming the consumer due to their inherent dangers or defects.

As part of Products Liability, there are three main types of product defects which include design defects (where the inherent design itself is harmful), manufacturing defects (that occur during production) and marketing defects like incorrect labeling or insufficient instructions.

• Design Defects: Herein lies fault at the very heart of a product’s blueprint–the problem arises from how it was conceived before it even came into fruition. If using a product as intended causes harm because of its poorly thought-out design , this falls under design defect.

• Manufacturing Defects: Even perfectly planned designs can fall through if mistakes happen during manufacturing stage. These deviations from the intended design lead to unsafe products reaching consumers’ hands causing injury which can be grounds for Product Liability claims.

• Marketing Defects: Arguably as important as what goes into making a product itself is ensuring clear communication about safe usage methods once out in public domain. Improper labels, lack of sufficient warnings and failure to instruct about safe usage render manufacturers legally liable when miscommunication leads to unintended personal injuries.

Understanding these aspects will aid you in discerning whether you qualify for filing a product liability claim if you have been subject to unfortunate distress owing to faulty products. But remember! Timing is crucial – timing limitations exist on when such cases can be hauled before court under ‘Statute Of Limitations’. Thus it is imperative to consider legal help promptly.

That’s where we play our part. At Carlson Bier, we pledge to champion your cause with sincere commitment and legal acumen to secure the compensation you rightfully deserve. It may include medical bills, lost wages due to inability to work during recovery period, pain and suffering compensations or even punitive damages in certain extreme situations.

We stand fortified in the belief that no person should endure silent suffering because of another entity’s negligence or over oversight. When products fall short on promised quality causing harm – the responsibility lies squarely with those who introduced them into market without ensuring safety standards.

Here at Carlson Bier, commitment goes beyond words – underpinning our legal assistance is a deep-seated allegiance towards upholding law & order. We go all out so that culpable parties are held accountable while ensuring justice for aggrieved clients like you, encumbered by products’ defects-induced injuries.

Bear in mind that each case is unique in its own ways; hence leave no room for guesswork when it’s about your rights & reparation. Delve into understanding specifics of your situation better with expert attorneys from Carlson Bier – quit hazarding guesses on how much compensation you could be eligible for and instead find out accurately by clicking on button below! Because at end of day one thing is unequivocal –your well-being deserves more than just ballpark figure estimations! Take first step towards bringing accountable parties before law, assessing rightful claims for reimbursement and securing peace of mind by reaching us now.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mundelein Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Mundelein

Areas of Practice in Mundelein

Bike Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending specialist legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Trip Occurrences

Professional in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Mishaps: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for harms and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering expert legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Building Incidents

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and skilled legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Focused on advocating for victims with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440