FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Near North Side

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re confronted with a product liability incident, the law firm of Carlson Bier possesses both experience and dedication your case warrants, without compromise to professional service. Recognized for our client-focused approach in Illinois as a personal injury firm, we understand how devastating such incidents can affect lives and livelihoods. Offering extensive knowledge on products liability litigation, you will benefit from our seasoned attorneys’ deep understanding of complexities surrounding these cases. From defective household goods to hazardous commercial equipment; whatever your circumstance might involve, we provide comprehensive legal counsel every step of the way. Never underestimate the value of choosing Carlson Bier – it’s not just about representing clients; it’s about providing solutions that make real differences to their lives beyond courtrooms and settlements. We strive for justice ensuring manufacturers uphold their responsibility towards consumers’ safety – an ambition unmet unless we secure victory on your behalf. Choose wisely with Resiliency – Commitment – Justice: trust us at Carlson Bier for all product liabilities considerations!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Near North Side Illinois

As seasoned personal injury attorneys in Illinois, Carlson Bier is committed to delivering exceptional legal representation for individuals affected by Products Liability. Understanding the broad dimensions of this area of law can be a challenge; thus, we’ve taken time to dig deep into these complexities, simplifying them for better comprehension.

Products Liability refers to holding manufacturers or sellers liable if a product is injurious or damaging due to defects. There are three kinds of defects that might cause harm and instigate potential liability – design defects, manufacturing defects, and failures to provide adequate warnings/instructions.

• Design Defects: A flaw in the initial design of the product predisposes it to become unsafe.

• Manufacturing Defects: These refer to issues arising during the production phase that render the product hazardous upon usage.

• Failure to Provide Adequate Warnings/Instructions: This defect arises when inadequate information about possible risks associated with usage is disseminated by producers or vendors.

At Carlson Bier, we navigate through each scenario appropriating blame effectively and working diligently towards securing fair compensation for our clients. Our approach involves thoroughly investigating incidents involving product-related injuries, harnessing expert knowledge on how specific products operate, identifying whether due diligence was indeed neglected by other parties involved – proving negligence in court amplifies chances of winning cases against defaulters.

We consistently keep tabs on changes/stipulations within Products Liability Law because many transformations transpire regularly given technological advancements integrated when manufacturing new-age goods. Striving for updated information equips us with robust defensive techniques which ensures that any claims brought forward brim with firm evidence while targeting favorable results.

Illinois laws mandate several preconditions before pursuing such cases — injured persons need vivid proof that faulty merchandise caused their health afflictions directly while proving genuine purchase from sellers/suppliers. Rigorous demands might seem daunting but our team at Carlson Bier swiftly traverse through extensive paperwork deftly rooting out critical elements helping exclusively tailor your case manifest.

Trusting the legal prowess of Carlson Bier guarantees an uncompromised fight against potential exploitation by large corporations or insurance companies. We work contingency-based, implying our commitment to win for you before deserving a slice. If we don’t deliver victory then expect no charges.

We are not just another law firm; we perceive our clients as partners sharing common interests. Personalizing your path towards justice involves fierce negotiations, detailed litigation processes and astute law maneuvering – that’s who we are at Carlson Bier; a partnership committed to seeking justice relentlessly sticking by your side till all possibilities have been exhausted in hind pursuit for rightful compensation.

Ingrained professional ethics restricts us from false advertising hence avoid any misleading notions about specific operational localities without rightful presence – For example, suggesting that we operate in Near North Side while lacking valid office space there conspicuously contradicts established regulations hence be assured of received honest information free from deception or baseless claims meant only entice unwitting clients.

Every interaction with us radiates utmost transparency enhancing trust relations we continually strive foster accentuating genuine care you rightfully deserve navigating tough injury times intent on seeing through until successful completion. Don’t let fear or uncertainty paralyze your next line of action in pursuing products liability claims.

Believe in yourself, believe in Carlson Bier; together let’s chart this journey towards reclamation of broken pieces shattered by someone else’s carelessness – remember one huge asset awaits your action right now: Just click the button below and discover how much your case is worth! Our team stands ready to guide and support you throughout this demanding yet potentially rewarding process because at Carlson Bier, Your Justice Is Our Priority.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Near North Side Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Near North Side

Areas of Practice in Near North Side

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving adept legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal help to clients affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Stumble Incidents

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Collisions: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents secure fair settlement for damages and harm.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Crash

Providing expert legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Expert in offering compassionate legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440