FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in North Aurora

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve recently been involved in a motorcycle accident in North Aurora, Illinois, the process to resolution can be challenging and distressing. That’s where Carlson Bier enters the picture – a distinguished legal firm proficient in handling Motorcycle Accident cases with extraordinary skill and tireless dedication. Our accomplished attorneys are profoundly experienced, working diligently to ascertain that our clients’ rights are protected while securing fair compensation for their injuries. At Carlson Bier, we realize each case is unique; hence we tailor strategies meticulously with strong attention to detail. Understanding motorcycle laws within Illinois places us at the strategic forefront of your representation providing insightful advice coupled with formidable courtroom representation when needed. The horrors of post-accident trauma like exorbitant medical bills or lost wages need not haunt you incessantly when partnering with us. Choosing Carlson Bier means opting for unyielding advocacy marked by transparency, personalized care and foremost respect for every client’s predicament creating lasting relationships founded on trust winning us immeasurable success over numerous years as personal injury lawyers par excellence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in North Aurora Illinois

Welcome to the official website of the Carlson Bier Group, your dedicated personal injury attorney firm that mainly serves Illinois residents. Motorcycle accidents are tragic events that can have a catastrophic impact on a person’s life physically, emotionally and financially. It is an area of law where we pride ourselves in offering top-tier representation.

The complexity surrounding motorcycle accident cases arises from multiple factors. These include determining fault, understanding insurance laws, allocating liability and navigating through intricate medical evidence, among other things. Our legal expertise covers these complex components extensively, ensuring we offer value-packed service with a high success rate for our clients.

Every detail matters when handling a personal injury claim caused by a motorcycle accident. First and foremost is establishing fault as this directly impacts compensation eligibility and amounts. We meticulously scrutinize every shred of evidence including accident reports, eyewitness testimonies and any potential video footage available to establish solid proof where blame lies.

Another crucial element associated with motorcycle accidents is managing the insurance laws intricacies that often confuse many victims seeking justice through proper compensation mechanisms. Insurance companies are known for their hardball tactics; they aggressively safeguard their bottom line by undervaluing claims or even outrightly denying them at times. With Carlson Bier group at your side you get powerful allies who understand the ins-and-outs of these tricky procedures guaranteeing pushback against any low-ball offers thrown your way.

Moreover, injuries sustained in such accidents are usually severe due to motorcyclists being much more exposed than car drivers; thus needing substantial medical attention. Medical proofs form part of key evidence proving damages suffered hence affecting compensation awarded post-claim victory. As seasoned attorneys dealing with countless personal injury scenarios influenced by varying degrees and types of injuries; we leave no stone unturned making sure you receive full compensation covering all past and future medical expenses resulting from your unfortunate ordeal.

In terms of Liability allocation, there could be instances where partial fault attribution happens – what’s commonly referred to as ‘Comparative Negligence.’ This essentially means that if you are partially at fault, your eligible compensation amount will be reduced by the percentage of blame attributed to you. Our professional attorneys bring on board a hawk-eye focus pinpointing and challenging any inconsistencies that might lead to unfair partial fault attribution affecting the overall reward due.

Bringing all these key components together when managing your Motorcycle Accident claim case significantly amplifies the chances of securing favorable results. Besides ensuring justice is served, our constant goal is to highly lessen any debt burdens from medical bills, lost income and other incidental costs inflicted due to the accident.

Remember – reaching out for legal support isn’t about greed or opportunism; it’s about protecting your rights while striving towards rightful restitution owed following misfortune brought upon by others negligence. To deny such support points towards victimizing oneself twice over – first through heinous physical harm and secondly via silent acceptance of associated financial stress imposed unjustly.

Trust us at Carlson Bier group to fight fervently in safe-guarding your rights within legal bounds ensuring diligence meets relentless pursuit for justice in obtaining maximum award settlement on your behalf.

As we conclude this detailed overview of how we aid victims navigate motorcycle accident personal injury cases, recognize only renowned experts can best strategize these complex litigation journeys with their assuring navigation compass pointed towards success. And who better fits this bill than us – Carlson Bier Group!

So why wait? Take decisive action right now! Click on the button below to effortlessly assess possible compensation values expected from your unique case circumstances based purely on expert estimations rooted in years of vast sector practical experience. There’s absolutely no obligation needed – every life deserves fair justice…and so does yours!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Aurora Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in North Aurora

Areas of Practice in North Aurora

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Supplying specialist legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Offering professional legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Injuries

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for injuries and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Incident

Offering adept legal services for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Expert in offering dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to assisting patients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440