FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in North Pekin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a motorcycle accident in North Pekin, securing the right legal representation could make all the difference. You don’t need an average injury attorney; choose Carlson Bier for an authoritative team of experts keenly focused on Motorcycle Accident Law. Our impeccable knowledge base is coupled with years of litigation success that we leverage to advocate for your rights relentlessly and aggressively negotiate on your behalf. With Carlson Bier, you gain partnership with a law firm renowned for adept skill in managing complex cases, detailed focus ensuring every element of your case receives diligent analysis, and steadfast dedication towards achieving favorable resolutions for our clients distressed by unfortunate vehicular accidents’ aftermath. Recognizing the unique challenges presented following a motorcycle collision – from dealing with insurance companies to navigating medical bills – underscores why getting equipped with specialised legal advice remains indispensable. Define the first steps towards restitution today – let Carlson Bier represent your interests dedicatedly as your preferred Motorcycle Accident Attorney Group beyond borders yet within reach to support you during this critical phase.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in North Pekin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your safety and rights as a motorcycle enthusiast are paramount to us. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our focus is on providing exceptional legal guidance to victims of Motorcycle Accidents. Whether you’re an experienced rider or a novice, accidents happen; and when they do, getting the right legal support can make all the difference.

Understanding the complexities surrounding Motorcycle Accidents is critical. Unlike other road incidents, these accidents often result in severe injuries or fatality due to the vulnerability of riders. This exposure escalates stakes and intricacies involved during litigation processes. Dealing with insurance companies could be daunting while combating painful injuries; hence why partnering up with experienced law firms like ours at Carlson Bier becomes invaluable.

Several key factors affect motorcycle accident cases:

• Negligence: Who was responsible for causing the accident? Was there a faulty part responsible?

• Damage Assessment: For both property damage (motorcycle) and physical damages (injuries).

• Insurance Coverage: Ensuring that payments are made promptly and fairly by insurance companies.

• Legal Protection: Against biases associated with motorcycles on roads dominated by automobiles.

Notably absent from this list is location bias because, unlike some legal jurisdictions keen on operating within particular locales only, we take pleasure in letting clients know where exactly we serve without illusions – solely staying true to Illinois’s Law Code provisions.

Our expertise extends beyond phenomenal courtroom skills and par excellence negotiation prowess with insurances; it refreshes one’s faith in justice being served aright! But how does this work?

We start with an initial case evaluation that involves gathering detailed reports about the accident scene, witness statements if available along with medical information outlining your injury severity levels post-accident care directives among others details vital towards building compelling case files aimed squarely at ensuring fair compensations remain within reach at all times irrespective ones background story nevertheless remains crucial guiding factor determining overall approach adopted dealing certain aspects revolving around said suit.

Next, a sharp focus on damage assessment runs concurrently with thorough investigative procedures. We bring comprehensive understanding and appraisal of the physical damages to both involved parties and their vehicles. This process ensures accurate claim figures that align with your rightful compensation – a hallmark at our Carlson Bier’s pursuit for justice.

At Carlson Bier, we are staunch advocates for fair treatment of motorcyclists in Illinois. We tirelessly fight against any form of discrimination or bias that might exist due to misconceptions around motorcyclists being reckless or careless road users – unfair presumptions that often affect insurance claims proceedings unfairly without factual support attached therein.

Establishing contact post-accident is urgent; however, if circumstances do not allow immediate consultations, please do not worry. Know this: The statute of limitations in Illinois for personal injury cases gives you two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit – an ample period within which solid cases could be compiled devoid rushed maneuvers as seen elsewhere without compromising quality over quantity.

Your suffering due to someone else’s negligence should never go uncompensated. Trust us to walk with you through this tumultuous journey towards achieving justice served righteously only asks unyielding commitment across board delivers precisely thus! With proven track record matched by glowing testimonials previous clientele whose lives have altered positively following successful litigation processes, why look elsewhere?

Ready to find how much your case could be worth? Click on the button below to receive personalized insights into potential monies owed pending successful lawsuits initiated behalf soonest! Remember: At Carlson Bier, your welfare remains primary goal irrespective situation hand always strive above beyond meeting expectations established instill renewed faith legal system within State Illinois proudly operating under aptly observed tenets enshrined thereof henceforth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Pekin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in North Pekin

Areas of Practice in North Pekin

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying adept legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving defective products, offering adept legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Slip Mishaps

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Traumas

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on helping victims of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Delivering specialist legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Building Crashes

Focused on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in extending dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for people who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to representing victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440