FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Olympia Fields

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you need a top-rated Products Liability attorney in Illinois, the name that stands out amongst the crowd is Carlson Bier. Devoted exclusively to advancing your cause, our experienced attorneys possess decades of combined experience and have successfully litigated various complex cases related to products liability issues. Exuding unparalleled mastery over intricate legalities specific to faulty or dangerous product-related injuries, we strategize with meticulous precision for every individual case. At Carlson Bier, our clients’ welfare remains paramount; hence we offer unswerving commitment alongside an unprecedented understanding of our native Illinois laws surrounding Product Liability. You can rest assured that keen aptitude and tenacity underpin every step taken by us towards securing maximal remuneration and justice for you right within the boundaries set forth by reputable legal jurisdiction here in Olympia Fields as well as statewide through Illinois. No matter what kind of Product Liability issue prevails upon you; whether caused by defective goods or malfunctioning products – prove your trust on none except ‘Carlson Bier,’ harnessing proficiency par-excellence!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Olympia Fields Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted Illinois-based personal injury attorney team, with expertise in the complex field of Products Liability. Our elite group of attorneys brings unparalleled experience and an unrivaled dedication when representing our clients who have been tragically affected by defective or unsafe products.

In a world where we increasingly rely on manufactured goods for various aspects of daily life, safety is paramount. The distressing fact remains that not all manufacturers uphold safety standards during production, which could lead to product-related injuries. At Carlson Bier, we believe you should understand the essence of Products Liability Law as it stands as a crucial pillar in safeguarding consumers from dangerous products.

• Products liability refers to holding a manufacturer or seller responsible for placing a perilous product into the hands of a consumer.

• Responsibility for a product defect that causes injury lies with all sellers involved in the distribution chain, from manufacturer to retailer.

• There are three main types of product defects: design defects, manufacturing defects, and marketing (or warning) defects. Each category carries its unique set of legal considerations and potential defenses.

For instance, imagine purchasing an electric kettle only for it to explode upon first use due to deficient fabrication – this instance falls under the scope of ‘manufacturing defect’. Whereas if consistent regular use results in harm owing purely to its structural composition even though impeccably assembled – then we’re contending with a ‘design defect’. Finally envision acquiring medicine without adequate instructions cautioning possible serious adverse side effects – this exemplifies ‘marketing defect’.

At Carlson Bier, understanding these nuances plays an essential role enabling us to competently guide our clients through their case while recognizing subtleties inherent between different defect classifications. We also aid them identify key components required for pursuance:

1. Proving that the defective product caused their injuries

2. Establishing negligence or fault on part of manufacturer

3. Confirming usage as intended during alleged incident

Far from merely explaining what Products Liability is, we wish to underscore the importance of selecting a competent and empathetic law firm to support you through such harrowing times. At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our professional sophistication coupled with compassion towards our clients’ pain and struggles. Our aim includes not only obtaining vindication for our clients but also contributing to driving safer products in the market.

Your case turned into successful action against negligent manufacturers could prevent numerous other prospective injuries, creating a ripple effect of consumer protection that extends far beyond your individual case — a powerful reminder that you’re not just one person up against a major corporation; rather, your story embodies vital catalyst instigating necessary change.

Remember: Manufacturers should bear responsibility for ensuring their products are safe. Consumers like yourself have an important role calling out breaches in safety standards wherever they exist. Together with us at Carlson Bier at the helm providing expert legal guidance every step along your journey towards justice.

Seeking advice regarding injury caused by defective or unsafe product? Take this opportunity to click on the button below and find out how much your case could be worth – You may seek compensation for medical expenses, wage loss, pain as well as suffering inflicted by use of faulty product, among other potential damages. Trust us today for transparent evaluation genuinely designed around prioritizing YOU because YOU matter! Don’t leave any question unanswered or any action untaken – Your journey towards recovery starts here at Carlson Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Olympia Fields Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Olympia Fields

Areas of Practice in Olympia Fields

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving expert legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering skilled legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Trip Incidents

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Neonatal Harms

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Focused on assisting sufferers of car accidents gain equitable payout for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Crash

Offering expert legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for injuries.

Building Incidents

Focused on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to delivering expert legal support for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal guidance to ensure justice.

Backbone Impairment

Dedicated to assisting clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440