FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Oneida

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When encountering a pedestrian accident in Oneida, securing sound legal advice is paramount. Carlson Bier, renowned personal injury attorneys, have solid experience handling such cases throughout Illinois. With comprehensive knowledge of state traffic laws and an unwavering commitment to their clients’ welfare, they meticulously unravel the complexities inherent in pedestrian accidents to protect your rights and secure you well-deserved compensation.

Their reputation is founded on significant verdicts obtained for previous victims of pedestrian incidents, reflecting both strong negotiation abilities and unmatched litigation expertise when necessary. Being immensely proud of this track record demonstrates not just proficiency but also genuine compassion toward aspiring towards the best possible outcome in each individual case.

Choosing Carlson Bier means entrusting your matter to experts who will aggressively pursue justice from those at fault while preserving your dignity during such distressing times. They believe that no one should brave through this alone and are equipped with resources matching their dedication to help you rise above these setbacks because with Carlson Bier by your side; getting back on track is achievable. Allow them the honor to be legally instrumental in building upstanders out of unfortunate circumstances for commendable resilience amidst adversity.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Oneida Illinois

At Carlson Bier, leading pioneers in the realm of personal injury law based on Illinois soil, we understand that pedestrian accidents can be both physically and emotionally destructive. These incidents often result in serious injuries or fatalities due to the sheer vulnerability of pedestrians compared to motorized vehicles. Reflecting our firm’s commitment to providing comprehensive legal assistance for victims of pedestrian accidents, the ensuing content aims at educating you about these unfortunate events while guiding you toward possible legal recourse.

Pedestrian accidents are generally caused by a plethora of factors revolving around driver negligence. It ranges from failing to yield right-of-way to pedestrians, distracted driving, drunk driving to excessively speeding within city limits or near crosswalks. Automobile defects and hazardous road conditions also nestle under this category along with drivers disrespecting traffic signals/ signs or turning right on red without looking.

Injuries sustained by pedestrians during an accident have a likelihood of being severe given the absence of any protective gear contrasting against the metal frame and velocity of oncoming vehicles. The repercussions are conspicuously disproportionate — traumatic brain injuries, fractures, spinal cord injuries culminating in paralysis, internal organ damage and abrasions carry prominent examples.

When thinking about pursuing legal recourse post pedestrian accident scenario it is essential to bear some critical things in mind:

• Timeliness: Promptness is key when reporting an incident as evidence needs to be collected while memories remain fresh.

• Evidence collection: This could range from photographs & video footage of the scene, eyewitness accounts or medical records detailing your extent of injury.

• Legal representation: Having a proficient attorney skilled in handling such cases goes a long way towards ensuring justice served.

Illinois follows a system known as modified comparative negligence which entails that even if you were partly responsible for causing the accident (less than 50%), you might still recover damages reduced proportionally by your percentage fault.

Our practiced team at Carlson Bier utilizes pertinent tools like police reports/fire department reports along with ‘black box’ data from vehicles involved to establish fault for an accident. Laws concerning pedestrian’s right-of-way and the drivers consequent failure to yield serve as pivotal factors in determining liability.

In terms of compensation, victims can claim compensatory damages; encapsulating medical bills (past and future), loss of past/future income due to disability, household services that the victim cannot perform and anguish sowed both mentally and physically by their injuries. Despite the financially alleviating resonance of these words, walking down this legal avenue is often challenging without driven advocacy.

It rings important that law does not hinge on luck but equity and justice. Carlson Bier is dedicated towards promoting lawful episodes following an unfortunate incident while concurrently ensuring your best interests are defended throughout any legal format. Our expert attorneys have honed their skills over several years via rigorous litigation resulting in proven track records spotlighting individual client needs above anything else.

Trust us at Carlson Brier with sculpting a powerful combination drawn from our extensive experience along with meticulous dedication all aimed at yielding maximum compensation for your pain and suffering.

Lawsuits involving pedestrian accidents bear witness to complex parameters and obtaining justice involves skillfully navigating through them. Walking alone might seem heavy; walk along with us at Carlson Bier: trust our knowledge, relish our expertise, gain peace of mind knowing we strive solely for securing what you duly deserve. We don’t win unless you do!

So take a moment! Seize this opportunity today! Click the button below to find out how much your case could potentially be worth – let’s strategize together towards reclaiming what’s rightfully yours!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oneida Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Oneida

Areas of Practice in Oneida

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending adept legal help for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Carelessness

Providing experienced legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Slip Incidents

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Damages

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Crashes: Committed to helping clients of car accidents receive fair recompense for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal advice for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Offering expert legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in providing specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Committed to supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440