FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Paxton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking compensation for injuries or damages caused by defective products, trust Carlson Bier. Our Illinois-based law firm specializes in Products Liability cases and provides unparalleled legal representation to injured individuals in Paxton. With our extensive experience, we strive to hold manufacturers accountable for defective products that harm consumers. We have a successful track record of securing favorable settlements and court verdicts, ensuring justice is served for our clients’ pain and suffering. At Carlson Bier, we place high importance on communication – whether it’s discussing complex legal matters or providing progress updates subsequently, you’re always informed about your case status timely. Furthermore, we operate on a contingency fee basis; this means you owe us nothing unless we win the case for you– reinforcing our absolute commitment to your cause! Our meticulous investigation process combined with excellent negotiation skills makes us a compelling choice to represent victims of product liability claims around Paxton region making sure their voice is heard! Choose Carlson Bier as your dedicated advocate in times of need!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Paxton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a premier personal injury law firm in Illinois; we pride ourselves on our vast expertise and personal touch when it comes to representing victims of products liability. This complicated area of the law deals with injuries or damages caused by a defective product. According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, close to three million people were injured due to dangerous or defective products in one year alone.

Here at Carlson Bier, we strive for uncompromised excellence and we want our clients to clearly understand what Products Liability encompasses. It is essentially the responsibility of a product manufacturer, distributor or supplier to compensate for any damages caused by their flawed or faulty goods – a responsibility that firms often tend to sidestep.

Key points clients need to be aware of include:

• A claim can be made against anyone involved in the manufacture.

• Negligence doesn’t always have to be proven; if your damage was incurred via use of the said product you may qualify for compensation.

• You are entitled to more than just medical expenses; loss of earnings, property damage and distress are all factored into your compensation sum.

Tackling such cases requires an in-depth understanding along with solid experience – traits which define our team at Carlson Bier. We have recuperated millions over the years for clients who became unfortunate victims due only to faulty products they trusted. Our attorneys pay meticulous attention to each angle while building up a concrete case because juries do consider credibility as well as merit during trials.

It’s pivotal not just having but also acting upon correct information when embroiled in such complex issues – and this rings especially true pertaining Article X Section 4 of Illinois Constitution dealing with product liability claims amongst others. Every piece holds its inherent significance paving way towards rightful justice served subsequently propelling us forwards within our mission here.

Carlson Bier isn’t above pinning down every minuscule detail stretching out thus across an entire spectrum to offer unbeatable service. We go beyond just understanding facts; we interpret situations, assess dynamics and construct most efficacious strategies vis-à-vis consumer law ensuring you receive the reparation you duly deserve while also contributing towards a safer society paving way for impactful regulations in long run.

We understand that embarking on this journey can be confusing and even intimidating at times but rest assured, we have got your back. Our team is dedicated to making this process as smooth as possible for our clients. And remember, decisions taken without legal representation often act as pre-cursors leading to unfavorable outcomes because navigating such intricate terrains does demand possessing adequate specialization.

As committed advocates of justice, there’s no other firm positioning itself better against negligent manufacturers than Carlson Bier does with our guests’ best interests secured always taking precedence over anything else. So why wait? Unfold the potential value within your case today!

Discovering what stands rightfully yours begins by clicking that button below so we may review your case thoroughly. Get started now on discerning how much could potentially be claimed against those liable! Allow us at Carlson Bier to fight vigorously protecting rights availed from residing in Land of Lincoln guaranteeing equal justice under law because every life holds a priceless tag – one worth fighting tooth and nail for preserving diligently!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Paxton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Paxton

Areas of Practice in Paxton

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Giving skilled legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Offering professional legal support for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending specialist legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal help for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents get reasonable settlement for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Offering expert legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Impairment

Specializing in assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440