Products Liability Attorney in Phoenix

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking superior representation in Phoenix for products liability cases, consider Carlson Bier. Leveraging unparalleled expertise and a track record of successful results, this group offers exemplary legal support to clients who have been adversely affected by defective or dangerous products. Products Liability is complex; these cases necessitate seasoned attorneys with the competence to navigate intricate regulations and documentation effectively. That’s what Carlson Bier stands for – professionalism, knowledge, gritted determination and an unwavering client focus – ensuring you attain rightful compensation for your distress. Whether it be medical devices that malfunction, harmful consumer goods or unsafe automotive parts; our team fights relentlessly to defend your rights amidst powerful adversaries like manufacturers or pharmaceutical giants. When life seems overwhelming post-injury due to a faulty product right here in Phoenix City – remember that you are not alone! The nationwide respected personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier will guide you through every step painstakingly towards justice regained! Remember: Your fight is our mission—Trust the journey with Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Phoenix Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a primary focus on Products Liability to serve our clients more effectively. As a premier law firm based in Illinois, we understand the specific regional statutes and ordinances that govern liability cases. One of the essential aspects of our service is educating our clients about their rights and the intricacies of Products Liability.

Products Liability refers to instances where a manufacturer or seller can be held liable for placing defective products into hands of consumers. It covers a wide range of product defects such as manufacturing defaults, design flaws, and lack of appropriate warnings or instructions regarding usage or potential hazards. Irrespective of the nature of harm or damage caused, whether it is physical injury, property damage, psychological trauma, financial loss or even death; this legal domain provides redressal mechanisms to procure lawsuit settlements for injured parties.

• Manufacturing Defects: These occur when there are errors during the production process resulting in a product that deviates from its intended design specification.

• Design Defects: Occurs when all products manufactured correctly according to an inherently dangerous design.

• Warning/Instructions Defects: A failure to provide accurate information regarding usage restrictions, operational guidelines and potential risks associated with using the product.

Our expert attorneys at Carlson Bier dedicate themselves to maintaining rigorous professional standards while diligently representing your interests. We leave no stone unturned exploring every avenue within existing laws for holding guilty parties accountable and ensuring you get fit-for-purpose compensation settlements.

Trust experience – trust Carlson Bier! With sound expertise drawn from years navigating complex Illinois legal landscapes coupled with specialized understanding in personal injury law and specifically products liability cases; rest assured – your case will be handled deftly underpinned by knowledge derived from numerous successful lawsuit outcomes.

Remember – litigation proceedings can be time-consuming involving nuanced negotiation skills backed by robust evidence collection drawing convincing narratives acceptable within court systems. Patience is critical because processes must follow due regulatory pathways on their own accord – every minor detail scrutinized deeply ensuring justice delivery without bias. Transparency is critical with agencies exchanging information and legal notices before progressing through judicial hierarchies.

We understand that litigation can be a daunting process for our clients, especially when they are already dealing with the trauma of injury or loss. Therefore, our team at Carlson Bier aims to take the burden off your shoulders as much as possible. We will guide you through each step of your lawsuit, ensuring complex legal jargon does not become an additional strain during challenging times.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t just offer services; we offer assurance—an unwavering commitment towards securing rightful compensation commensurate with your case merits completes our unique client-centric methodology in full measure!

Don’t hesitate! Legal recourse waits for no one – laws mandate strict filing deadlines contingent on injury cause determined by reliable evidence collection falling within statutory limitation periods. Delay only reduces opportunities closing doors permanently on deriving warranted relief support structures.

Worthy to note: choosing your lawyer directly impacts prospects maximizing potential settlement magnitude significantly – cost implications intertwining closely with proficiency levels demonstrated by proficient personal injury attorneys providing seasoned guidance showcasing immense lawsuit experience consistency nestled amidst deep-rooted community recognition littering countless success stories across Illinois’s vast landscapes.

Finally, we invite you to click the button below and fill out a short expression form. This simple act enables prompt assessment helping analyze how much possibly could be your case worth up-front prior allocating dedicated resources further exploring options for achieving desirable lawsuit outcomes tailored preferentially around individual circumstances carrying distinct unique signatures awaiting skilled interpretation expertly elucidating emerging patterns accurately shaping focused strategies adopted literally paving roadmaps leading towards victory paths defined utterly wholly by justifiable claims substantiated tremendously through credible proof aggregation supporting valid claims rightfully warranting deserving indemnification fair justice guaranteed delivering promise driven by core principles embodied valuing customer satisfactions realized fully encapsulated completely truly carving unmistakable individual identities prominently extraordinarily. Rest assured, at Carlson Bier – you matter the most!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Phoenix Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Phoenix

Areas of Practice in Phoenix

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Offering professional legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, delivering skilled legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Trip Occurrences

Professional in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Neonatal Wounds

Providing legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents receive fair remuneration for hurts and damages.

Scooter Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Semi Incident

Extending adept legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Dedicated to ensuring professional legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Specializing in supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer