Construction Site Accident Attorney in Pingree Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the event of construction site accidents, receiving just and fair compensation can be a daunting task. This is where Carlson Bier approaches with unmatched expertise. Strategically centered in Illinois, we extend our expansive legal prowess to represent individuals involved in construction site incidents in Pingree Grove and its environs. With decades of experience under our belt, we proudly boast a proven track record of success for our clients – victories derived from detailed accident investigation processes, deep understanding of construction law intricacies and assertive negotiation abilities. Our commitment goes beyond winning cases; it hones on empathetic representation that alleviates stress off your shoulders while aggressively pursuing justice on your behalf. Relying on personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier simply connotes entrusting your case to seasoned professionals who make you their priority without cutting corners or compromising quality service delivery for optimal results tailored to meet individual client needs.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Pingree Grove Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, a foremost personal injury law firm based in Illinois. Our specialty lays in addressing an extensive number of cases related to construction site accidents. When you or a loved one fall victim to incidents at the workplace, we are here to ensure your rights are protected and justice served swiftly.

A construction site is undeniably inundated with significant risks. While strict safety measures should be implemented, unavoidable circumstances often lead to devastating accidents inflicting damaging consequences on victims involved – all while changing their lives forever. In our vast experience working with such individuals bearing these hardships, we’ve gained exhaustive knowledge about various types of construction accidents and the legal recourse available for each.

Some key points worth mentioning include:

• Heavy Machinery Accidents: These involve large equipment like cranes or bulldozers causing harm due to functional faults or human error.

• Slip and Falls: Probably the most common type of accident where workers suffer from severe injuries due to improper surfaces or poor housekeeping practices.

• Electrocution Incidents: Occurs when workers come into contact with live power sources either through unsafe machinery usage or inadequate protective gear.

• Falling Object Accidents: These happen when materials fall from elevated structures onto workers below.

Understanding these kinds of incidents gives us insight into potential claims you might be entitled to make if similar misfortune befalls you.

Victims of construction accidents possess rights granted by Illinois state laws assuring them protection against unjust consequences stemmed from others’ negligence. At Carlson Bier, we extend our expert hand in helping victims pursue rightful compensation for medical expenses, future medical care costs including rehabilitation, lost wages during recuperation period or any loss of earning capacity, emotional distress along with pain suffering endured due to injury.

Our accomplished team provides meticulous case evaluations ensuring potential factors leading up to the incident are thoroughly looked into – ranging from sickening disregard for safety standards by site owners/managers/contractors down even non-existent or ill-fitted protective gear.

Illinois applies the comparative negligence rule, implying a victim’s compensation is reduced by the percentage of their blame in an accident. For instance, if you were found 30% responsible for an accident that cost you $100,000 in damage, you’d be able to claim $70,000 from another party involved. This intricacy emphasizes why it’s critical to have staunch legal support which we proudly offer at Carlson Bier.

Successfully obtaining rightful justice requires strategic litigation and negotiation with insurance companies; such associations are often treading tricky ground where victims may find themselves swamped battling clauses created with the intention to limit liability coverage. Our vast experience uniquely equips us to tackle complexities invariably promoting favorable outcomes for our clients.

In line with preserving your best interests, it’s crucially essential for potential claimants to act swiftly following accidents – owing to Illinois’ statute limitations requiring construction accident claims filed within a specific period subsequent mishap taking place.

Your right towards pursuing fair restitution should not lay compromised due to these complex timings and processes. Trust us – we’re here every step of this path lending expert guidance ensuring you grasp how legal proceedings will transpire along addressing any ensuing queries whilst putting your mind at ease.

You’ve endured enough suffering already; now allow us carry on some weight off your shoulders transforming your journey towards recovery into one less burdened permitting you focus on getting better while we concentrate on getting even for what happened unjustly.

At Carlson Bier, we take immense pride in standing tall representing those wrongly affected serving as beacon helping navigate through adversities bestowing ray of hope onto bleak circumstances.

Intrigued? Eager about learning more irrespective whether case stands chance winning lawsuit? Considering extension making difference withholding tide turning outcome potentially favoring case?

Now’s time start finding answers looking further! Click button below undergo evaluation revealing how much case might worth keeping apprehensions at bay. Remember, we’re committed helping you get justice that rightfully belongs.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pingree Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Pingree Grove

Areas of Practice in Pingree Grove

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending adept legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending professional legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving defective products, extending specialist legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Fall Incidents

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Wounds

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents obtain equitable payout for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Providing professional legal assistance for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to extending expert legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Specializing in advocating for persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer