FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Plainfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a product liability issue, one’s foremost consideration should be acquiring solid legal representation. Look no further than Carlson Bier, renowned for their unmatched expertise in handling complex products liability cases. Our attorneys understand that such matters require not just knowledge of the law but also a detailed comprehension of the unique intricacies surrounding every case. At Carlson Bier, we have demonstrated our proficiency time and again by securing successful outcomes for individuals affected by defective or unsafe products. What sets us apart? Our dedication to clients—an unyielding commitment which has allowed families across Plainfield and beyond to achieve compensation through meticulous investigation and fierce litigation strategies specifically tailored towards garnering justice against reckless manufacturers or sellers responsible for your suffering in form of physical injuries or other damages as a result of failed safety standards. Count on Carlson Bier’s extensive experience navigating Illinois’ challenging personal injury landscape when considering support pertaining to product liability lawsuits—your pursuit of fair redress is our priority.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Plainfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to adequately represent and counsel victims of personal injury, with our expertise significantly focused on products liability cases. Understanding the legalities associated with products liabilities will empower you to make informed decisions about your situation.

Product liability refers to a manufacturer or seller being held liable for placing a defective product into the hands of consumers. Harmful consequences resulting from faulty products can lead to severe injury or even death. This makes products liability an extremely critical sector within personal injury law practice.

As certified professionals in this field, there are several vital points on which we want to focus your attention:

• Strict Liability: This principle applies if the commercial sale of a defective product causes harm – despite showing that utmost caution was taken during design, manufacturing, and marketing stages.

• Negligence: If you encounter damage because proper care was not effectively implemented during the product’s creation process (designing and manufacturing) or distribution phase (marketing/sales), it falls under negligence.

• Breach Of Warranty: This involves violation against express warranties (clearly specified by the manufacturer) or implied warranties (guaranteed merchantability safety standards).

Whatever aspect of the claim is at play—be it strict liability or breach of warranty—we at Carlson Bier assess each fact meticulously. Our comprehensive case evaluation will uncover essential details regarding your accident, data analyses about how it occurred, potential testimonies from experts in related fields like engineering/product development etc., providing strong evidence backing up your claim.

Moreover, your understanding and involvement throughout the process are indeed significant aspects leading us towards victory together; thus our team ensures transparent communication coupled with easy-to-understand explanations every step of way.

Carlson Bier champions justice for people suffering due to someone else’s wrongful conduct or negligent practices specifically in handling products making their way into users’ possession. Keeping Illinois laws and regulations at heart while representing clients through trials/jury proceedings—as well as negotiation, mediation or arbitration if possible—we deliver results that reflect legitimate claims in the most optimum way possible.

Our practice is structured around one clear objective: to secure maximum compensation permissible under Illinois state law for our clients, alongside mental peace, fulfillment and closure that justice has been achieved. With decades of rich experience in handling personal injury cases with a special accent on product liability claims, we not only strive to get you compensated but also ensure deterrent measures to make sure such incidents do not reoccur.

Finally, with an expert legal overview coupled with seamless client services, Carlson Bier gives your case thorough attention amplified by persuasive advocacy it truly deserves. To understand better how much your claim might be worth particularly when debating over product issues related to manufacturing/ designs flaws or marketing misrepresentation; click on the button below for more details. Tap into our resources as we are ready and able to fight tirelessly for what you rightfully deserve. Trust us with all aspects of your legal journey and receive optimal outcomes based on genuine compassion coupled with focused aggression against responsible entities behind faulty products causing harm at large.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Plainfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Plainfield

Areas of Practice in Plainfield

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering professional legal services for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, offering expert legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Trip Accidents

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Semi Mishap

Extending specialist legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Expert in ensuring professional legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unfair Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Committed to representing patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440