Construction Site Accident Attorney in River Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a construction site accident inflicts not just physical pain, but often results in financial and emotional strain as well. It’s at such times that you require staunch legal representation to navigate complex laws related to personal injury cases, construction site regulations, and workers’ compensation rights. Carlson Bier brings extensive knowledge of Illinois law pertaining to these intricate situations, providing assertive advocacy for victims of Construction Site Accidents. Our attorneys meticulously probe into every little detail involved in the incident ensuring your case receives undivided attention it rightfully deserves. We recognize the hardships endured by our clients post-accident; therefore we endeavor resolutely towards achieving maximum possible compensation on their behalf. When you choose Carlson Bier as your representatives – be assured you have chosen dedicated experts committed towards helping restore normalcy back in life after debilitating accidents.Our relentless pursuit for justice blended with compassion makes us an outstanding choice when seeking legal help post-construction site incidents.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in River Grove Illinois

As a leading force in the legal sphere, Carlson Bier is dedicated to serving victims of construction site accidents through its accomplished roster of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois. At the heart of our ethos lies client empowerment, ensuring that every individual who crosses our path obtains comprehensive knowledge about their situation and rights.

Construction site accidents are unfortunately commonplace within the industry, often having severe implications for workers’ health and livelihoods. You might be surprised at how multifaceted these incidents can be as they straddle various branches of law: from workplace safety to worker’s compensation, from product liability laws to those governing third-party negligence.

Let us explore some key themes regarding construction site accidents:

• Worker’s Compensation: Every state has unique laws concerning worker’s compensation. In Illinois, you are entitled to medical expenses coverage and potentially disability pay if work-related injuries lead you to miss workdays. However, receiving this compensatory benefit forfeits your right to sue your employer for negligence directly.

• Third-Party Liability: If a party other than your employer’s negligence caused your accident (such as a contractor or equipment manufacturer), there may be grounds for an additional lawsuit – thereby supplementing your worker’s compensation.

• Product Liability: When faulty machinery or inadequate safety gear contributes to an accident, victims can file product liability lawsuits against manufacturers.

Unfolding such dense legal threads could pose challenges when one is also grappling with physical and emotional trauma post an incident—that’s where we come in. The formidable team at Carlson Bier blends exhaustive legal prowess with compassion so that clients feel heard and defended—even when faced against powerful entities like corporations or insurance companies.

However complex your case seems or however daunting–remember this essential fact—you don’t have to familiarize yourself with all nuances and complexities of injury law; let us carry that burden for you—let us navigate the nuance on your behalf.

Our past victories speak volumes about the level of dedication we bring to each case. At the same time, it’s your experience and perspective—your personal truth—that adds soul to our facts-and-figures-oriented profession. Finding justice for you fuels us because, at Carlson Bier, your fight becomes our purpose.

Discovering the worth of your case is an empowering step towards securing the appropriate compensation, a step often misconstrued as either too daunting or distant. Gone are those days! With modern technology in real-time access to legal professionals worldwide, dispatching early evaluation has never been simpler—we encourage you to utilize these resources thoroughly. Click on the button below; fortified data points teased from your unique circumstances combined with our seasoned understanding of comparative cases will yield a potential value figure that could be instrumental to upcoming strategic decisions.

Do keep in mind that each lawsuit owns its distinctiveness: The conveyed estimate constitutes projected worth based on available information—it isn’t a guarantee but rather a well-informed starting point from where we work tirelessly towards earning you every bit that’s rightfully yours!

At Carlson Bier – Defending You Defines Us!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For River Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in River Grove

Areas of Practice in River Grove

Bike Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing expert legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering professional legal support for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal help for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Accidents: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents get just payout for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Focused on defending victims with vertebral damage, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer