Construction Site Accident Attorney in Robinson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is a frontrunner among personal injury law firms specializing in construction site accidents. Based out of Illinois, our legal team provides expert representation for those unfortunate enough to face the harrowing aftermath of a worksite incident. Our long-standing philosophy is rooted in prioritizing the well-being and interests of our clients after such distressing incidences occur, aiming to secure comprehensive compensation that reflects their pain and suffering. We approach cases with meticulous precision, exhaustive research, profound knowledge about industry standards and regulations along with worker rights protection. With Carlson Bier’s undivided commitment to achieving just outcomes for its construction-site accident clients, workers not only find an advocate but also gain empowerment through understanding their legal rights within the complex framework of workplace safety laws. Trust us at Carlson Bier; allow us the opportunity to champion your cause against negligence or abuse propelling these devastative incidents within society’s foundation pillars: construction sites.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Robinson Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the inherent dangers and risks that come with working within the construction industry. Our law firm stands as a beacon of hope for those who have fallen victim to accidents on construction sites in Illinois. Specializing in personal injury law, our seasoned attorneys strive to provide assistance during these challenging times by offering exceptional legal services tailored to your needs.

Construction site accidents often lead to serious injuries due to the precarious nature of the work environment. Falling objects, slip and fall incidents, equipment failure, scaffold collapse – these are just a few examples of potential hazards faced by workers every day. Each incident is unique and requires careful analysis by occupational health and safety experts who can testify regarding adherence or deviation from necessary standards.

• Falling Objects: Unsecured tools or materials can easily become hazardous when dropped from heights.

• Slip and Fall Incidents: Irregular terrain, wet surfaces or debris increase the risk for falls further creating opportunities for severe injuries.

• Equipment Failure: Faulty machinery or ill-maintenance can pose significant threats to employee safety.

• Scaffold Collapse: Improper assembly, overloading or structural fault may result in catastrophic collapses.

Once enlisted with Carlson Bier, our diligent attorneys take swift measures towards meticulous evidence gathering to build a strong case backing your claim effectively. We navigate this intricate process banking on years of experience dealing with insurance companies that capitalize on legislative nuances trying their best not to dole out deserved compensatory damages.

Beyond immediate medical expenses such as hospital bills and treatment costs; long-term implications must also be addressed like physical therapy charges, rehabilitation costs and even lost wages due to time off work recovering from an incapacitation sustained at your job site. Remember each case varies greatly based upon numerous parameters including but not limited to – severity of injury sustained; extent of any permanent damage such as scarring or disfigurement; amount of wages lost while convalescing; the degree which obvious negligence played derailing your health, wellbeing and means of livelihood.

At Carlson Bier, we dispassionately assess the full scope of these damages and aggressively advocate to get you the best compensation possible that truly reflects bygone, present and future losses endured due to unfortunate construction site accidents. Our stalwart vow stands for fair representation regardless of socioeconomic class or employment status within Illinois’s extensive construction industry landscape.

In discouragingly large instances, workplace injuries lend themselves to emotional trauma affecting psychological well-being as much as physical health blocking potential return to work even after physical healing occurs naturally over time. We vehemently address this less tangible yet crucial aspect during our negotiation or court proceedings aiming towards total wellbeing revitalization for every client reaching out to us.

Each step ahead with Carlson Bier assures peace-of-mind knowing legal aspects of accident aftermath are well looked after by a team deeply caring about your holistic recovery process while tirelessly working towards attaining maximal legally permissible compensation to cushion against disturbing financial burdens falling upon shoulders still recuperating from physical pains brought along by alarming worksite conditions deviating onto negative spectrum.

You have rights; let us at Carlson Bier help enforce them. If you’ve suffered from a construction site accident in Illinois, it’s paramount you understand how much your case is worth. By clicking on the button below, you can initiate the process toward utilizing our expertise in personal injury law assuring optimal outcomes for each individual case personalised thoroughly resonating with unique circumstances encountered facing misfortunes arising through negligent actions causing unnecessary suffering at workplaces supposed to be safe havens dedicated towards contributing constructively in building up society relentlessly never pausing unless forced stopping unwarranted distressful occurrence leading lives astray undeservingly causing deep-rooted discord unfolding life’s harmonious balance sadly depriving genuine hard-working individuals engaging trustingly within their professional roles dutifully abiding rules laid down keeping everyone unhurt productively going along fulfilling assignments deserving commendation not compensation for undesired personal injuries.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Robinson Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Robinson

Areas of Practice in Robinson

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or risky conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying specialist legal help for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing professional legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving defective products, extending specialist legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Trip Mishaps

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Birth Harms

Delivering legal aid for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to aiding victims of car accidents secure equitable recompense for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending adept legal advice for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Focused on delivering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in advocating for persons with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer